Literature DB >> 32320800

Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.

Jvan Casarin1, Giorgio Bogani2, Andrea Papadia3, Antonino Ditto2, Ciro Pinelli4, Simone Garzon4, Nicoletta Donadello4, Antonio Simone Laganà4, Antonella Cromi4, Michael Mueller3, Francesco Raspagliesi2, Fabio Ghezzi4.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors associated with poorer oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for early stage cervical cancer.
DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study.
SETTING: Three gynecologic oncology referral centers. PATIENTS: Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IA (positive lymphovascular space invasion)-IB1 cervical cancer between January 2006 and June 2018.
INTERVENTIONS: LRH (Piver type II-III hysterectomies). Lymph-node dissection was accomplished according to the tumor characteristics.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surgical and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Overall, 186 patients met the inclusion criteria, 16 (8.6%) experienced a recurrence, and 9 (4.8%) died of the disease (median follow-up period 37.9 months). Surgery-related complications did not influence disease-free survival. All the recurrences (16/16; 100%) occurred in patients with stage IB1 disease (p = .02), and 15 (93.7%) in cases involving tumors ≥2 cm. No association between positive lymph node and recurrence was detected (p =.82). Patients who had a preoperative diagnosis through conization (93; 50%) had a significantly lower rate of recurrence than those who underwent cervical biopsy (93; 50%): 1/93 (1.1%) vs 15/93 (16.1%); p <.001). The subanalysis of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1 cervical cancer showed that patients undergoing preoperative conization (vs cervical biopsy) were less likely to experience a recurrence (odds ratio 0.09; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.55).
CONCLUSION: We confirmed that LRH was associated with a recurrence rate similar to that reported in the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial. Tumor size ≥2 cm represents the most important risk factor influencing disease-free survival. However, we found that preoperative conization plays a potentially protective role in patients with an IB1 tumor.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32320800     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  16 in total

1.  New Advances in Cervical Cancer: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Ottavia D'Oria; Giacomo Corrado; Antonio Simone Laganà; Vito Chiantera; Enrico Vizza; Andrea Giannini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  A rare case of gastric-type mucinous endocervical adenocarcinoma in a 59-year-old woman.

Authors:  Francesk Mulita; Fotios Iliopoulos; Ioannis Kehagias
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2020-10-02

3.  Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?

Authors:  Louise Benoit; Meriem Koual; Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan; Vincent Balaya; Claude Nos; Rosa Montero-Macías; Anne-Sophie Bats
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Circ_0019435 Exerts Its Functions in the Cellular Process of Cervical Cancer via Epigenetically Silencing DKK1 and PTEN.

Authors:  Qiming Wang; Zhihong Zhuo; Huimin Yu; Chuhan Wang; Li Gao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019.

Authors:  Danuta Vasilevska; Dominika Vasilevska; Andrzej Semczuk; Vilius Rudaitis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Accuracy of the Triple Test Versus Colposcopy for the Diagnosis of Premalignant and Malignant Cervical Lesions.

Authors:  Neda Fatahi Meybodi; Mojgan Karimi-Zarchi; Leila Allahqoli; Leila Sekhavat; George Gitas; Azam Rahmani; Arezoo Fallahi; Babak Hassanlouei; Ibrahim Alkatout
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Prognostic Factors Associated with 5-Year Overall Survival in Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Hysterectomy Followed by Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy at a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Mihai Stanca; Mihai Emil Căpîlna
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22

8.  Case Report: Giant Pelvic Cystic Appearance-An Unusual Feature of Uterine Cervical Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yongxin Wang; Xue Shan; Man Li; Ying Yue
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-09

9.  Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in patients with node-positive cervical squamous cell carcinoma following radical surgery.

Authors:  Qinhao Guo; Jun Zhu; Yong Wu; Hao Wen; Lingfang Xia; Min Yu; Simin Wang; Xingzhu Ju; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma of the uterine cervix: a case report.

Authors:  Takuto Nakamura; Masato Yoshihara; Satoshi Tamauchi; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.