C Jacomet1, F Linard2, J Prouteau3, C Lambert4, R Ologeanu-Taddei5, P Bastiani6, P Dellamonica7. 1. Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France. Electronic address: cjacomet@chu-clermontferrand.fr. 2. Services des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Tenon, CHU de Hôtel-Dieu, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, France. 3. Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France. 4. Délégation recherche clinique & innovation, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France. 5. Systèmes d'Information, Montpellier recherche en management & polytech Montpellier, université de Montpellier, France. 6. AC SIDA, Nice, France. 7. Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, université de la Côte-d'Azur, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV and their physicians concerning telemedicine and the collection of computerized personal information. METHODS: Multicenter online observational survey from October 15 to 19, 2018. RESULTS: Study participation was accepted by 229 physicians and 838/1,377 PLHIV followed in 46 centers, of which 325 (39%) responded online. We found that while 226/302 (75%) PLHIV accept online prescription renewals and 197/302 (65%) accept online medical certificates, 182/302 (60%) PLHIV-who were more often in material/social deprivation (OR=1.70±0.45; P=0.045), less often born in Île-de-France (OR=0.43±0.15; P=0.018), with lower CD4 T-cell counts (OR=0.999±0.0004; P=0.038), and less often on psychiatric treatment (OR=0.50±0.18; P=0.047)-were receptive to teleconsultations. However, 137/225 (61%) physicians would be uncomfortable teleconsulting due to inadequate data security without it reducing the number of consultations or offering economic benefit. Asked about collection of computerized personal information, 197/296 (67%) PLHIV and 139/223 (62%) physicians agreed it improved quality of care, but 144 (49%) PLHIV and 94/222 (42%) physicians thought it was not sufficiently framed by the law. eHealth was seen as improving coordination between health professionals by 240/296 (81%) PLHIV and seen as a good thing by 181/225 (81%) physicians. CONCLUSION: More than half of PLHIV were ready for telemedicine. PLHIV and physicians endorsed the advantage of e-health in terms of better coordination across health professionals but mistrust the data collection factor, which warrants either clarification or stronger legal protections.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV and their physicians concerning telemedicine and the collection of computerized personal information. METHODS: Multicenter online observational survey from October 15 to 19, 2018. RESULTS: Study participation was accepted by 229 physicians and 838/1,377 PLHIV followed in 46 centers, of which 325 (39%) responded online. We found that while 226/302 (75%) PLHIV accept online prescription renewals and 197/302 (65%) accept online medical certificates, 182/302 (60%) PLHIV-who were more often in material/social deprivation (OR=1.70±0.45; P=0.045), less often born in Île-de-France (OR=0.43±0.15; P=0.018), with lower CD4 T-cell counts (OR=0.999±0.0004; P=0.038), and less often on psychiatric treatment (OR=0.50±0.18; P=0.047)-were receptive to teleconsultations. However, 137/225 (61%) physicians would be uncomfortable teleconsulting due to inadequate data security without it reducing the number of consultations or offering economic benefit. Asked about collection of computerized personal information, 197/296 (67%) PLHIV and 139/223 (62%) physicians agreed it improved quality of care, but 144 (49%) PLHIV and 94/222 (42%) physicians thought it was not sufficiently framed by the law. eHealth was seen as improving coordination between health professionals by 240/296 (81%) PLHIV and seen as a good thing by 181/225 (81%) physicians. CONCLUSION: More than half of PLHIV were ready for telemedicine. PLHIV and physicians endorsed the advantage of e-health in terms of better coordination across health professionals but mistrust the data collection factor, which warrants either clarification or stronger legal protections.