Ayami Ohno Kishimoto1, Masako Kataoka2, Mami Iima3, Maya Honda1, Kanae Kawai Miyake1, Akane Ohashi1, Rie Ota1, Tatsuki Kataoka4, Takaki Sakurai4, Masakazu Toi5, Kaori Togashi1. 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. 2. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. Electronic address: makok@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan; Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. 4. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. 5. Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the performance of high resolution (HR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI), compared with high-resolution contrast-enhanced MRI (HR CE-MRI) in terms of morphological accuracy, on the basis of the Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) MRI descriptors and lesion size. METHODS: This retrospective study included the image data of 94 patients with surgically confirmed malignant breast lesions who had undergone high resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (HR-DWI) and HR CE-MRI. Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis independently identified the lesions on HR-DWI, described the morphology of the lesions according to BI-RADS descriptors, and measured lesion size. HR CE-MRI was subsequently evaluated using the same procedure. The inter-method agreement of the morphology was assessed using kappa statistics. Correlation on size was also assessed. RESULTS: Reader A detected 79 mass lesions and 37 non-mass lesions on HR-DWI and HR CE-MRI. Reader B detected 81 mass lesions and 33 non-mass lesions on HR-DWI and HR CE-MRI. Very high agreement (kappa = 0.81-0.89, p < .05) was observed in the shape and margin assessment of mass lesions, where agreement on internal enhancement/signals was moderate to substantial (kappa = 0.43-0.61, p < .05). Disagreement was mostly seen in the evaluation of rim enhancement. High agreement was observed for non-mass lesion distribution (kappa = 0.76-0.84, p < .05), and agreement on internal enhancement/signals was moderate to fair (kappa = 0.34-0.49, p < .05). Agreement among heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered-ring patterns was variable. Size assessment showed very strong correlation both in mass (Spearman's rho = 0.90-0.96, p < .0001) and non-mass lesions (Spearman's rho = 0.86, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings in morphology and lesion extent showed high agreement between HR-DWI and HR CE-MRI for malignant breast lesions. These results imply the potential of applying HR-DWI for evaluation of malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS MRI.
PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the performance of high resolution (HR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI), compared with high-resolution contrast-enhanced MRI (HR CE-MRI) in terms of morphological accuracy, on the basis of the Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) MRI descriptors and lesion size. METHODS: This retrospective study included the image data of 94 patients with surgically confirmed malignant breast lesions who had undergone high resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (HR-DWI) and HR CE-MRI. Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis independently identified the lesions on HR-DWI, described the morphology of the lesions according to BI-RADS descriptors, and measured lesion size. HR CE-MRI was subsequently evaluated using the same procedure. The inter-method agreement of the morphology was assessed using kappa statistics. Correlation on size was also assessed. RESULTS: Reader A detected 79 mass lesions and 37 non-mass lesions on HR-DWI and HR CE-MRI. Reader B detected 81 mass lesions and 33 non-mass lesions on HR-DWI and HR CE-MRI. Very high agreement (kappa = 0.81-0.89, p < .05) was observed in the shape and margin assessment of mass lesions, where agreement on internal enhancement/signals was moderate to substantial (kappa = 0.43-0.61, p < .05). Disagreement was mostly seen in the evaluation of rim enhancement. High agreement was observed for non-mass lesion distribution (kappa = 0.76-0.84, p < .05), and agreement on internal enhancement/signals was moderate to fair (kappa = 0.34-0.49, p < .05). Agreement among heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered-ring patterns was variable. Size assessment showed very strong correlation both in mass (Spearman's rho = 0.90-0.96, p < .0001) and non-mass lesions (Spearman's rho = 0.86, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings in morphology and lesion extent showed high agreement between HR-DWI and HR CE-MRI for malignant breast lesions. These results imply the potential of applying HR-DWI for evaluation of malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS MRI.
Authors: Zhen Lu Yang; Yi Qi Hu; Jia Huang; Chen Ao Zhan; Min Xiong Zhou; Xiao Yong Zhang; Hui Ting Zhang; Li Ming Xia; Tao Ai Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Ashley M Mendez; Lauren K Fang; Claire H Meriwether; Summer J Batasin; Stéphane Loubrie; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 5.738