In recent decades, atomic force microscopy (AFM), in particular the force spectroscopy mode, has become a method of choice to study biomolecular interactions at the single-molecule level. However, grafting procedures as well as determining binding specificity remain challenging. We report here an innovative approach based on a photocleavable group that enables in situ release of the ligands bound to the AFM tip and thus allows direct assessment of the binding specificity. Applicable to a wide variety of molecules, the strategy presented here provides new opportunities to study specific interactions and deliver single molecules with high spatiotemporal resolution in a wide range of applications, including AFM-based cell biology.
In recent decades, atomic force microscopy (AFM), in particular the force spectroscopy mode, has become a method of choice to study biomolecular interactions at the single-molecule level. However, grafting procedures as well as determining binding specificity remain challenging. We report here an innovative approach based on a photocleavable group that enables in situ release of the ligands bound to the AFM tip and thus allows direct assessment of the binding specificity. Applicable to a wide variety of molecules, the strategy presented here provides new opportunities to study specific interactions and deliver single molecules with high spatiotemporal resolution in a wide range of applications, including AFM-based cell biology.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atomic force microscopy; PEG linker; interaction; optochemical probe; photocleavable; photolysis; single-molecule force spectroscopy
Over the last decades, AFM has
proved to be one of the main techniques for the nanoscale characterization
and manipulation of biological specimens under physiological conditions
thanks to the combination of its high spatiotemporal resolution and
its ability to work in controlled atmospheres.[1] Rapidly, force spectroscopy mode developments together with the
ability to functionalize the AFM tip with covalently attached biological
moieties opened new avenues to probe the forces involved in biointeractions
down to the piconewton range and to extract the association dissociation
kinetics through established biophysical models.[2] In addition, technological advances in force–distance
curve-based AFM (FD-based AFM) enable us to correlate the biomolecular
force characterization to simultaneous high-resolution images of biological
structures under native conditions.[3] As
a result, AFM has become one of the most versatile tools for ligand–receptor
single-molecule force spectroscopy, which can be performed on systems
ranging from biomolecule-grafted model surfaces to cellular receptors
and bacterial and mammalian cells.[4] Moreover,
nowadays fluorescence microscopy techniques are routinely implemented
in a variety of commercial AFM setups, allowing structural identification
of the biological targets by cell biology approaches and further expanding
the range of applications of the technique.[5]Notwithstanding the huge progress AFM has witnessed over the
years,
some of the most fundamental limitations of AFM-based force spectroscopy
have not yet been overcome. Mainly, the technique still suffers from
uncertainties linked to the identification of the specific interactions
established between the ligand and its specific receptor, among all
the inevitable nonspecific interactions.[6,7] The latter
are generated from interactions of the tip and/or the immobilized
ligand with surface components other than the receptor of interest
(e.g., spacers, bare surface areas for model substrates, and other
biomolecules in the case of more complex systems). The proportion
of nonspecific interactions depends on the complexity of the investigated
biological systems, i.e., from receptor-grafted surfaces to lipid
membrane models and cells, in which having multiple spurious interactions
becomes the rule rather than the exception. Current strategies to
differentiate specific and unspecific interactions rely on control
experiments using nonfunctionalized AFM tips and/or blocking experiments
in which free ligands in excess are injected to prevent the specific
interaction (ligand itself, antagonist, or antibody).[8,9] Nevertheless, these strategies do not always lead to convincing
results and are usually time- and cost-consuming.Here
we present an optochemical approach that takes advantage of
the combination of AFM and fluorescence microscopy to control the
release of biomolecules from the AFM tips via a photocleavable group
inserted into the poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) spacer during the tip
functionalization (see Scheme ). The insertion of a photoresponsive o-nitrobenzyl
unit[10,11] within the hydrophilic PEG spacer enables
us to achieve postmeasurement light-induced dissociation of the covalently
attached ligand. Similar linker cleaving strategies have been proposed
before, but they either require the addition of reducing agents potentially
unsuitable for complex biological systems[12] or are limited to gold-coated AFM cantilevers, which restrict the
range of applications.[13] In our experimental
setup, the light source is a standard mercury arc lamp equipped with
a G 365 bandpass excitation filter, which is routinely used for fluorescence
dyes in the UV range, such as the cell nuclear stain 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI), and is therefore widely available on most commercial microscopes.
This easy-to-implement strategy provides a practical way to introduce
internal controls into AFM-based force spectroscopy experiments and
opens new avenues to bio-AFM-based applications.
Scheme 1
Schematic and Experimental
Concept of an AFM Tip Functionalized with
a Photocleavable Group, Followed by Heterobifunctional PEG Linker
Attachment and Ligand Coupling to Probe the Interaction with a Cognate
Receptor before and after Controlled Ligand Release via Photolysis
at 365 nm
As a first proof of concept
of our approach, we investigated the
well-characterized avidin–biotin interaction.[14] We functionalized the AFM tips with biotin groups using
the heterobifunctional PEG linker with the photocleavable group by
a multistep procedure (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information) and probed the interactions with avidin molecules
physisorbed on glass (Figure a–d). In parallel, biotin-functionalized AFM tips lacking
the photocleavable group were used as a negative control (Figure e–h). For
both photocleavable tips (Figure b,c) and control tips (Figure e,f), rupture forces in the range of 50–100
pN were detected, in good agreement with values reported in the literature
for avidin–biotin interactions[14] (examples of FD curves are presented in Figure S2). Remarkably, upon irradiation of the photocleavable AFM
tips for 5 min at 365 nm in situ, the frequency of rupture forces
in this range (50–100 pN) was drastically reduced (Figure d), while no decrease
was observed for the binding probability of the biotin-functionalized
control tips (Figure h). These results clearly indicate efficient photolysis of the photoreactive
linker, leading to a controlled switch-off of the biotin–avidin
interactions in situ. Notably, direct irradiation of the functionalized
AFM tips through the glass substrate does not lead to significant
sample damage, as evidenced by the control experiment, for which the
binding probability was not altered after light exposure. A higher
binding probability is observed with the photocleavable tips in comparison
with the control tips before photocleavage (Figure d,h). This suggests that the linker structural
change imparted by the insertion of the photocleavable spacer could
allow more orientational freedom for biotin, resulting in a higher
number of detected avidin–biotin interactions.
Figure 1
Force spectroscopy of
single avidin–biotin interactions
acquired with (a–d) photocleavable and (e–h) control
AFM tips. (a) Scheme of the photocleavable tips system. (b, c) Adhesion
force histogram and (inset) 5 μm × 5 μm map of the
avidin–biotin interaction before (b) and after (c) photolysis
at 365 nm for 5 min. (d) Box plot of the relative binding frequency
before and after (dashed) photolysis, showing a significant decrease
in binding. (e) Scheme of the control tips system. (f, g) Adhesion
force histogram and (inset) 5 μm × 5 μm map of the
avidin–biotin interaction before (f) and after (g) photolysis
at 365 nm for 5 min. (h) Box plot of the relative binding frequency
before and after (dashed) photolysis, showing no significant decrease
in binding. Data are representative of at least n = 3 independent experiments, with a minimum of n = 10 analyzed adhesion maps before and after photolysis. ns, P > 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001; determined
by two-sample t test in Origin.
Force spectroscopy of
single avidin–biotin interactions
acquired with (a–d) photocleavable and (e–h) control
AFM tips. (a) Scheme of the photocleavable tips system. (b, c) Adhesion
force histogram and (inset) 5 μm × 5 μm map of the
avidin–biotin interaction before (b) and after (c) photolysis
at 365 nm for 5 min. (d) Box plot of the relative binding frequency
before and after (dashed) photolysis, showing a significant decrease
in binding. (e) Scheme of the control tips system. (f, g) Adhesion
force histogram and (inset) 5 μm × 5 μm map of the
avidin–biotin interaction before (f) and after (g) photolysis
at 365 nm for 5 min. (h) Box plot of the relative binding frequency
before and after (dashed) photolysis, showing no significant decrease
in binding. Data are representative of at least n = 3 independent experiments, with a minimum of n = 10 analyzed adhesion maps before and after photolysis. ns, P > 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001; determined
by two-sample t test in Origin.Next, similar experiments were performed on a His6peptide–tris-NTA
model system (Figure ). In this setup, photocleavable (Figure a–d) and control (Figure e–h) tris-NTA-functionalized
AFM tips were used to probe the interaction with His6-peptide-functionalized
surfaces (see Figure S3). As for avidin–biotin,
after an initial assessment of tris-NTA–His6rupture
forces and binding probability, the functionalized AFM tips were exposed
to UV light in situ for 5 min to release the tris-NTA groups. Tris-NTA
was found to bind the His6peptide with rupture forces
in the 50–200 pN range[15,16] and binding probabilities
up to ∼80%, indicating a high peptide surface coverage under
our experimental conditions. Similarly to what we observed for the
avidin–biotin system, the binding probability of the tris-NTA-functionalized
photocleavable tips decreased considerably after UV light exposure,
while no variation was found for the tris-NTA control tips, confirming
that biomolecular interactions can be efficiently suppressed in situ
through controlled photocleavage of the ligand from the AFM tips.
Figure 2
Force
spectroscopy of single His6 peptide–tris-NTA
interactions acquired with (a–d) photocleavable and (e–h)
control AFM tips. (a) Scheme of the photocleavable tips system. (b,
c) Adhesion force histogram and (inset) 5 μm × 5 μm
map of the His6 peptide–tris-NTA interaction before
(b) and after (c) photolysis at 365 nm for 5 min. (d) Box plot of
the relative binding frequency before and after (dashed) photolysis,
showing a significant decrease in binding. (e) Scheme of the control
tips system. (f, g) Adhesion force histogram and (inset) 5 μm
× 5 μm map of the His6 peptide–tris-NTA
interaction before (f) and after (g) photolysis at 365 nm for 5 min.
(h) Box plot of the relative binding frequency before and after (dashed)
photolysis, showing no significant decrease in binding. Data are representative
of at least n = 3 independent experiments, with a
minimum of n = 10 analyzed adhesion maps before and
after photolysis. ns, P > 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001; determined by two-sample t test in
Origin.
Force
spectroscopy of single His6peptide–tris-NTA
interactions acquired with (a–d) photocleavable and (e–h)
control AFM tips. (a) Scheme of the photocleavable tips system. (b,
c) Adhesion force histogram and (inset) 5 μm × 5 μm
map of the His6peptide–tris-NTA interaction before
(b) and after (c) photolysis at 365 nm for 5 min. (d) Box plot of
the relative binding frequency before and after (dashed) photolysis,
showing a significant decrease in binding. (e) Scheme of the control
tips system. (f, g) Adhesion force histogram and (inset) 5 μm
× 5 μm map of the His6peptide–tris-NTA
interaction before (f) and after (g) photolysis at 365 nm for 5 min.
(h) Box plot of the relative binding frequency before and after (dashed)
photolysis, showing no significant decrease in binding. Data are representative
of at least n = 3 independent experiments, with a
minimum of n = 10 analyzed adhesion maps before and
after photolysis. ns, P > 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001; determined by two-sample t test in
Origin.Finally, to demonstrate that our
strategy is applicable to more
complex biological systems, we tested the feasibility of the photocleavable
linker to study single-virus binding to living mammalian cells. To
this end, we functionalized AFM tips with fluorescently labeled reoviruses
with or without a photocleavable group (see Figure S4). The functionalized tips were used to probe virus interactions
with Chinese hamsterovary (CHO) cells overexpressing junction adhesion
molecule A (JAM-A), which we recently showed to be an efficient binding
receptor for reoviruses.[17] By the use of
FD-based AFM combined with laser scanning confocal microscopy (Figure ), the AFM tip was
raster-scanned on the cell surface, and rupture forces were extracted
for each pixel. Imaging of the AFM tip using laser-scanning confocal
microscopy showed that after 5 min of UV light exposure, reoviruses
were efficiently removed from the AFM tips bearing the photocleavable
groups but remained attached to AFM tips having no photocleavable
group (either directly irradiated (Figure a) or irradiated through the cell sample
(Figure b, top row)).
Furthermore, the comparison between AFM topography (Figure b, middle row) and adhesion
images (Figure b,
bottom row) revealed that virus release was accompanied by a significant
decrease of binding event probability, from ∼12% to ∼3–4%.
As a control, consecutive mapping with AFM tips lacking the photocleavable
groups did not show this behavior, with a stable binding event probability
of ∼10%, confirming that the virus remained attached for several
consecutive maps. Indeed, although a slight decrease of the fluorescence
intensity was observed, likely due to photobleaching, the control
tips did not seem to significantly release reoviruses (Figure c,d, top row) or lose cell-binding
capability after light exposure (Figure d, middle and bottom rows), suggesting that
both phenomena are specifically related to the linker cleavage and
virus release. The proof-of-concept experiments presented here confirm
the versatility of the photocleavable approach. In addition, preliminary
results demonstrated the possibility of releasing virions at a defined
location on a cell layer upon photocleavage (Figure S5), opening new opportunities to further AFM- and fluorescence-microscopy-based
cell biology applications.
Figure 3
(a, b) Proof-of-concept and (c, d) control (no
photocleavable group)
experiments on large-scale molecules (reovirus) interacting with specific
reovirus attachment receptors (sialic acid, JAM-A) probed on living
CHO-JAM-A cells (see the Supporting Information). (a) AFM tip functionalized with a fluorescently labeled (Alexa
488, green) reovirus releases most of the single viruses after photocleavage
and shows a significant decrease in binding frequency after probing
their interaction on JAM-A-overexpressed CHO cells (highlighted areas
in b). (c) The control experiment shows almost no virus release after
photocleavage as well as no significant drop in binding frequency
(highlighted areas in d).
(a, b) Proof-of-concept and (c, d) control (no
photocleavable group)
experiments on large-scale molecules (reovirus) interacting with specific
reovirus attachment receptors (sialic acid, JAM-A) probed on living
CHO-JAM-A cells (see the Supporting Information). (a) AFM tip functionalized with a fluorescently labeled (Alexa
488, green) reovirus releases most of the single viruses after photocleavage
and shows a significant decrease in binding frequency after probing
their interaction on JAM-A-overexpressed CHO cells (highlighted areas
in b). (c) The control experiment shows almost no virus release after
photocleavage as well as no significant drop in binding frequency
(highlighted areas in d).In summary, we have presented a practical and versatile optochemical
approach to control the release of biomolecules from AFM cantilevers.
The method has been applied successfully both to receptors immobilized
on model surfaces and to more complex biological systems. The ligand
release upon UV light exposure appears to be a powerful internal control
for force spectroscopy experiments. Furthermore, more sophisticated
biology-oriented applications for combined AFM–optical microscopy
instruments, such as the possibility of releasing ligands at specific
cellular locations while following the evolution of cellular responses,
are envisaged in the near future.
Authors: Yves F Dufrêne; Toshio Ando; Ricardo Garcia; David Alsteens; David Martinez-Martin; Andreas Engel; Christoph Gerber; Daniel J Müller Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Petr Klán; Tomáš Šolomek; Christian G Bochet; Aurélien Blanc; Richard Givens; Marina Rubina; Vladimir Popik; Alexey Kostikov; Jakob Wirz Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: A S M Kamruzzahan; Andreas Ebner; Linda Wildling; Ferry Kienberger; Christian K Riener; Christoph D Hahn; Philipp D Pollheimer; Peter Winklehner; Martin Hölzl; Bernd Lackner; Daniela M Schörkl; Peter Hinterdorfer; Hermann J Gruber Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Simon J Attwood; Anna M C Simpson; Samir W Hamaia; Dominique Bihan; Debdulal Roy; Richard W Farndale; Mark E Welland Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 5.923