Literature DB >> 32320141

Patient-reported experience measures are essential to improving quality of care for chronic wounds: An international qualitative study.

Lee Squitieri1,2,3, Elena Tsangaris4, Anne F Klassen5, Emiel L W G van Haren6, Lotte Poulsen7, Natasha M Longmire5, Tert C van Alphen6, Maarten M Hoogbergen6, Jens Ahm Sorensen7, Karen Cross8,9, Andrea L Pusic4.   

Abstract

Traditional quality measures for chronic wounds have focused on objective outcomes that are challenging to risk adjust, lack patient input, and have limited ability to inform quality improvement interventions. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) provide information from the patient perspective regarding health care quality and have potential to improve patient-centredness, increase care efficiency, and generate actionable data for quality improvement. The purpose of this study was to understand patient experiences and health care processes that impact quality of care among patients with chronic wounds. Sixty patients at least 18 years of age with various wound aetiologies were recruited from Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, and the United States as part of a larger phase 1 qualitative study to develop a patient-reported outcome measure for chronic wounds (WOUND-Q). All patients had a chronic wound for at least 3 months, were fluent in their native speaking language, and able to participate in a one-on-one semi-structured interview. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interpretive description was used to identify recurrent themes relating to patient experience and quality of care. We identified five domains (care coordination, establishing/obtaining care, information delivery, patient-provider interaction, and treatment delivery) and 21 sub-domains (access to patient information, interdisciplinary communication, encounter efficiency, provider availability, specialist referral, staff professionalism, travel/convenience, modality, reciprocity, understandability/consistency, accountability, continuity, credentials, rapport, appropriateness, complication management, continuity, environment/setting, equipment and supply needs, expectation, and patient-centred) as potential opportunities to measure and improve quality of care in the chronic wound population. PREMs for chronic wounds represent an important opportunity to engage patients and longitudinally assess quality across clinical settings and providers. Future research should focus on developing PREMs to complement traditional objective and patient-reported outcome measures for chronic wounds.
© 2020 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  experience; international; patient-reported; qualitative; wounds

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32320141     DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  1 in total

1.  Primary Care Wound Clinics: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Patient Experiences in Community Pharmacies.

Authors:  Lusi Sheehan; Sheldon Dias; Michael Joseph; Sahil Mungroo; Jake Pantinople; Kenneth Lee
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.