Literature DB >> 32320129

Explanation for COVID-19 infection neurological damage and reactivations.

Kevin Roe1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32320129      PMCID: PMC7264610          DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis        ISSN: 1865-1674            Impact factor:   4.521


× No keyword cloud information.
A new pathogenic virus, COVID‐19, appeared in 2019, in Wuhan, China, typically causing fever, cough, diarrhoea and fatigue and significant mortality (Mao et al., 2020). From mid‐January to mid‐February in 2020, 214 patients with both non‐severe and severe COVID‐19 infections confirmed by nucleic acid tests were examined by a panel of neurologists. Seventy‐eight patients (36.4%) displayed neurological symptoms, including central nervous system symptoms of dizziness, headache, impaired consciousness, acute cerebrovascular disease with either ischemic stroke or cerebral haemorrhage, ataxia, seizures; peripheral nervous system symptoms of taste impairment, smell impairment, vision impairment and nerve pain; and skeletal muscle injury (Mao et al., 2020). The reactivation of previous COVID‐19 infections after recent previously negative test results has also been reported in about 9% of a small study of patients (55 total patients with five reactivations, but the time window of reactivation observation was only 17 days long, and more reactivations could likely have been seen over a longer time period), and this and other disturbing reports of COVID‐19 reactivation will likely be unwelcome and met with skepticism (Ye et al., 2020). The patients, aged 27–42 years old, who had reactivation of COVID‐19 did not have any underlying diseases, such as diabetes, chronic hypertension or cardiovascular disease; and reactivations occurred regardless of any anti‐viral therapy received, without any discovery of any clinical characteristics to enable the prediction of future viral reactivation (Ye et al., 2020). COVID‐19 has also shown about 80% genetic similarity to the severe acute respiratory symptom (SARS) virus, which is already known to be derived from a bat virus (Ye et al., 2020). The reports of neurological symptoms from COVID‐19 could potentially be disputed. And the unwelcome reports of reactivation of the COVID‐19 virus in patients who had previously tested negative could potentially be disputed as being the result of defective testing procedures, or the result of defective viral tests reporting a false‐negative on a previous COVID‐19 infection. However, there are actually good reasons to believe the veracity of these disturbing reports concerning COVID‐19, because both the reported neurological symptoms and the reported reactivations of the virus are consistent with previous reports regarding a well‐documented bat‐derived enveloped RNA virus. Nipah virus causes many of the same neurological symptoms after infections, and the reactivation of Nipah virus from latent infections of patients even months and years later has been reported in the scientific literature (CDC, 2014; Luby, 2013; Thibault, Watkinson, Moreira‐Soto, Drexler, & Lee, 2017; WHO, 2018; Wong et al., 2002; World Health Organization, 2018). Nipah virus symptoms match several COVID‐19 symptoms and include fever, drowsiness, headache, disorientation/confusion, giddiness, myalgia (muscle pain), coughing, convulsions, vomiting, reduced consciousness, myoclonus (muscle twitches), hyporeflexia/areflexia (of spinal nerves), seizures, cranial nerve palsy, pyramidal signs (voluntary motor cortex nerve damage), nystagamus (involuntary eye movement), dysphasia (communication impairment from brain damage) and so forth (Wong et al., 2002). Nipah virus is another untreatable and lethal virus, transmissible by bodily secretions of humans and other mammals, and even considered fully capable of a world‐wide pandemic spread after mutation (CDC, 2014; Luby, 2013; Thibault et al., 2017; WHO, 2018; World Health Organization, 2018). The COVID‐19 virus and Nipah virus illustrate the virulence of some viral pathogens after transmission from animals to humans. Some viral pathogens can display a high replication rate in host cells after transmission to secondary hosts of other species, such as in the case of viruses that originally evolved high replication rates while they infected animals such as bats and thereby were selected by the fast immune responses of bats (Brook et al., 2020). This is characteristic of several enveloped RNA viruses, including Nipah virus of the genus Henipavirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus of the genus Betacoronavirus (Brook et al., 2020; Flint, Racanielllo, Rall, Skalka, & Enquist, 2015). There is a very good reason for viruses, such as COVID‐19 and Nipah virus, to selectively infect neurons, because this enables them to evade attacks from the immune system of the host. Almost all T‐cell activations require that an antigen (i.e., a molecular pattern that a patient's immune system recognizes as foreign to the patient) be presented by another cell, such as a dendritic cell, on a specific surface protein known as a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (Alberts et al., 2015). In humans, this is also called a human‐leukocyte‐associated (HLA) protein (Alberts et al., 2015). T cells predominantly are α:β T cells with the MHC requirement for antigen presentation to activate α:β T cells, such as MHC class II for presentation to CD4 T cells and MHC class I for presentation to cytotoxic CD8 T cells (Alberts et al., 2015). But neurons carry very few of these MHC proteins, so they cannot easily present viruses on MHC class I to cytotoxic CD8 T cells to induce an attack on the infected neurons (Murphy, 2012). Therefore, several viruses, such as the herpesviruses including the herpes simplex virus and the herpes zoster virus, also evade the host immune system by going into a state of latency with low replication while they infect neurons, and by this means they can create lifelong infections that can be reactivated whenever some stress weakens the host immune system (Murphy, 2012). Although some viral infections can be lifelong, it should be noted that at this early stage, there is no evidence that COVID‐19 infections could be lifelong in any survivors. In conclusion, reports of widespread reactivation of the COVID‐19 virus and its neurological symptoms are actually consistent with a similar well‐studied enveloped RNA virus known as the Nipah virus. Nipah virus causes many of the same neurological symptoms, and the reactivation months or years later of Nipah virus from latent infections have been noted. The overall similarity of COVID‐19 to the Nipah virus also implies that the pandemic infections of COVID‐19 will be a greater public health challenge than previously believed in terms of its neurological damage to survivors and its ability to reactivate later from latent infections of some survivors, even after previously negative virus test results.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The author confirms that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted on the journal's author guidelines page, have been adhered to. No ethical approval was required as this is a review article with no original research data.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author has no potential conflicts of interest.
  6 in total

1.  Nipah virus infection: pathology and pathogenesis of an emerging paramyxoviral zoonosis.

Authors:  Kum Thong Wong; Wun-Ju Shieh; Shalini Kumar; Karim Norain; Wahidah Abdullah; Jeannette Guarner; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Kaw Bing Chua; Sai Kit Lam; Chong Tin Tan; Khean Jin Goh; Heng Thay Chong; Rani Jusoh; Pierre E Rollin; Thomas G Ksiazek; Sherif R Zaki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Ling Mao; Huijuan Jin; Mengdie Wang; Yu Hu; Shengcai Chen; Quanwei He; Jiang Chang; Candong Hong; Yifan Zhou; David Wang; Xiaoping Miao; Yanan Li; Bo Hu
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 3.  Zoonotic Potential of Emerging Paramyxoviruses: Knowns and Unknowns.

Authors:  Patricia A Thibault; Ruth E Watkinson; Andres Moreira-Soto; Jan F Drexler; Benhur Lee
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 9.937

4.  The pandemic potential of Nipah virus.

Authors:  Stephen P Luby
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.970

5.  Accelerated viral dynamics in bat cell lines, with implications for zoonotic emergence.

Authors:  Cara E Brook; Mike Boots; Kartik Chandran; Andrew P Dobson; Christian Drosten; Andrea L Graham; Bryan T Grenfell; Marcel A Müller; Melinda Ng; Lin-Fa Wang; Anieke van Leeuwen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Clinical characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reactivation.

Authors:  Guangming Ye; Zhenyu Pan; Yunbao Pan; Qiaoling Deng; Liangjun Chen; Jin Li; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.072

  6 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Role of Inflammatory Cytokines in COVID-19 Patients: A Review on Molecular Mechanisms, Immune Functions, Immunopathology and Immunomodulatory Drugs to Counter Cytokine Storm.

Authors:  Ali A Rabaan; Shamsah H Al-Ahmed; Javed Muhammad; Amjad Khan; Anupam A Sule; Raghavendra Tirupathi; Abbas Al Mutair; Saad Alhumaid; Awad Al-Omari; Manish Dhawan; Ruchi Tiwari; Khan Sharun; Ranjan K Mohapatra; Saikat Mitra; Muhammad Bilal; Salem A Alyami; Talha Bin Emran; Mohammad Ali Moni; Kuldeep Dhama
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  Massive transient damage of the olfactory epithelium associated with infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 in golden Syrian hamsters.

Authors:  Bertrand Bryche; Audrey St Albin; Severine Murri; Sandra Lacôte; Coralie Pulido; Meriadeg Ar Gouilh; Sandrine Lesellier; Alexandre Servat; Marine Wasniewski; Evelyne Picard-Meyer; Elodie Monchatre-Leroy; Romain Volmer; Olivier Rampin; Ronan Le Goffic; Philippe Marianneau; Nicolas Meunier
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Re: Chilblain-like lesions on feet and hands during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Rokea El-Azhary
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.736

4.  COVID-19: 10 things I wished I'd known some months ago.

Authors:  Peter Pickkers; Hans van der Hoeven; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Intracranial hemorrhage in critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Authors:  Islam Fayed; Gnel Pivazyan; Anthony G Conte; Jason Chang; Jeffrey C Mai
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 6.  Cytokine Storm in COVID-19 Patients, Its Impact on Organs and Potential Treatment by QTY Code-Designed Detergent-Free Chemokine Receptors.

Authors:  Mujahed I Mustafa; Abdelrahman H Abdelmoneim; Eiman M Mahmoud; Abdelrafie M Makhawi
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.529

Review 7.  Myasthenia gravis at the crossroad of COVID-19: focus on immunological and respiratory interplay.

Authors:  Giuliana Galassi; Alessandro Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.396

Review 8.  Facing acute neuromuscular diseases during COVID-19 pandemic: focus on Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Giuliana Galassi; Alessandro Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.396

9.  SARS-CoV-2, where to now?

Authors:  Michael P Ward
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.521

10.  High COVID-19 virus replication rates, the creation of antigen-antibody immune complexes and indirect haemagglutination resulting in thrombosis.

Authors:  Kevin Roe
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.