Mariana Dineva1, Harry Fishpool1, Margaret P Rayman1, Jeewaka Mendis2, Sarah C Bath1. 1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom. 2. Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency, particularly in pregnancy, is prevalent; this is of concern because observational studies have shown negative associations with child neurodevelopment. Although neither the benefits nor the safety of iodine supplementation in pregnancy in areas of mild-to-moderate deficiency are well researched, such supplementation is increasingly being recommended by health authorities in a number of countries. OBJECTIVES: By reviewing the most recent published data on the effects of iodine supplementation in mildly-to-moderately deficient pregnant women on maternal and infant thyroid function and child cognition, we aimed to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support recommendations in these areas. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT interventions, and observational studies was conducted. To identify relevant articles, we searched the PubMed and Embase databases. We defined mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency as a baseline median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) of 50-149 µg/L. Eligible studies were included in meta-analyses. RESULTS: In total, 37 publications were included-10 RCTs, 4 non-RCT interventions, and 23 observational studies. Most studies showed no effect of iodine supplementation on maternal or infant thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine. Most RCTs found that supplementation reduced maternal thyroglobulin and in 3 RCTs, it prevented or diminished the increase in maternal thyroid volume during pregnancy. Three RCTs addressed child neurodevelopment; only 1 was adequately powered. Meta-analyses of 2 RCTs showed no effect on child cognitive [mean difference (MD): -0.18; 95% CI: -1.22, 0.87], language (MD: 1.28; 95% CI: -0.28, 2.83), or motor scores (MD: 0.28; 95% CI: -1.10, 1.66). CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient good-quality evidence to support current recommendations for iodine supplementation in pregnancy in areas of mild-to-moderate deficiency. Well-designed RCTs, with child cognitive outcomes, are needed in pregnant women who are moderately deficient (median UIC < 100 µg/L). Maternal intrathyroidal iodine stores should be considered in future trials by including appropriate measures of preconceptional iodine intake.This review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero as CRD42018100277.
BACKGROUND: Mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency, particularly in pregnancy, is prevalent; this is of concern because observational studies have shown negative associations with child neurodevelopment. Although neither the benefits nor the safety of iodine supplementation in pregnancy in areas of mild-to-moderate deficiency are well researched, such supplementation is increasingly being recommended by health authorities in a number of countries. OBJECTIVES: By reviewing the most recent published data on the effects of iodine supplementation in mildly-to-moderately deficient pregnant women on maternal and infant thyroid function and child cognition, we aimed to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support recommendations in these areas. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT interventions, and observational studies was conducted. To identify relevant articles, we searched the PubMed and Embase databases. We defined mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency as a baseline median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) of 50-149 µg/L. Eligible studies were included in meta-analyses. RESULTS: In total, 37 publications were included-10 RCTs, 4 non-RCT interventions, and 23 observational studies. Most studies showed no effect of iodine supplementation on maternal or infant thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine. Most RCTs found that supplementation reduced maternal thyroglobulin and in 3 RCTs, it prevented or diminished the increase in maternal thyroid volume during pregnancy. Three RCTs addressed child neurodevelopment; only 1 was adequately powered. Meta-analyses of 2 RCTs showed no effect on child cognitive [mean difference (MD): -0.18; 95% CI: -1.22, 0.87], language (MD: 1.28; 95% CI: -0.28, 2.83), or motor scores (MD: 0.28; 95% CI: -1.10, 1.66). CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient good-quality evidence to support current recommendations for iodine supplementation in pregnancy in areas of mild-to-moderate deficiency. Well-designed RCTs, with child cognitive outcomes, are needed in pregnant women who are moderately deficient (median UIC < 100 µg/L). Maternal intrathyroidal iodine stores should be considered in future trials by including appropriate measures of preconceptional iodine intake.This review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero as CRD42018100277.
Authors: Laura Croce; Luca Chiovato; Massimo Tonacchera; Elena Petrosino; Maria Laura Tanda; Mariacarla Moleti; Flavia Magri; Antonella Olivieri; Elizabeth N Pearce; Mario Rotondi Journal: Rev Endocr Metab Disord Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: James B B Adams; Jacob C C Sorenson; Elena L L Pollard; Jasmine K K Kirby; Tapan Audhya Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 5.717