Literature DB >> 32319443

[Ethical, deontologic and legal considerations about SIAARTI Document "Clinical ethics recommendations for the allocation of intensive care treatments, in exceptional, resource-limited circumstances".]

Mariassunta Piccinni1, Anna Aprile2, Paolo Benciolini3, Lucia Busatta4, Elena Cadamuro5, Paolo Malacarne6, Francesca Marin7, Luciano Orsi8, Elisabetta Palermo Fabris9, Alessandra Pisu10, Debora Provolo11, Antonio Scalera12, Marta Tomasi13, Nereo Zamperetti14, Daniele Rodriguez15.   

Abstract

On 6 March 2020, the Italian Society of Anaesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive care (SIAARTI) published the document "Clinical Ethics Recommendations for Admission to and Suspension of Intensive Care in Exceptional Conditions of Imbalance between Needs and Available Resources". The document, which aims to propose treatment decision-making criteria in the face of exceptional imbalances between health needs and available resources, has produced strong reactions, within the medical-scientific community, in the academic world, and in the media. In the current context of international public health emergency caused by the CoViD-19 epidemic, this work aims to explain the ethical, deontological and legal bases of the SIAARTI Document and to propose methodologic and argumentative integrations that are useful for understanding and placing in context the decision-making criteria proposed. The working group that contributed to the drafting of this paper agrees that it is appropriate that healthcare personnel, who is particularly committed to taking care of those who are currently in need of intensive or sub-intensive care, should benefit from clear operational indications that are useful to orient care and, at the same time, that the population should know in advance which criteria will guide the tragic choices that may fall on each one of us. This contribution therefore firstly reflects on the appropriateness of the SIAARTI standpoint and the objectives of the SIAARTI Document. It then turns to demonstrate how the recommendations it proposes can be framed within a shared interdisciplinary, ethical, deontological and legal perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32319443     DOI: 10.1701/3347.33184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recenti Prog Med        ISSN: 0034-1193


  5 in total

1.  Age, "Life-Cycles," and the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources.

Authors:  Thomas May; Mark P Aulisio
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Managing COVID-19 within and across health systems: why we need performance intelligence to coordinate a global response.

Authors:  D Kringos; F Carinci; E Barbazza; V Bos; K Gilmore; O Groene; L Gulácsi; D Ivankovic; T Jansen; S P Johnsen; S de Lusignan; J Mainz; S Nuti; N Klazinga
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-07-14

3.  Liability of Health Care Professionals and Institutions During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Symposium Proceedings and Position Statement.

Authors:  Antonio Oliva; Matteo Caputo; Simone Grassi; Giuseppe Vetrugno; Marco Marazza; Giulio Ponzanelli; Roberto Cauda; Giovanni Scambia; Gabrio Forti; Rocco Bellantone; Vincenzo L Pascali
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Development of a Critical Care Response - Experiences from Italy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Authors:  Emanuele Rezoagli; Aurora Magliocca; Giacomo Bellani; Antonio Pesenti; Giacomo Grasselli
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 5.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in an intensive care unit (ICU): Psychiatric symptoms in healthcare professionals - A systematic review.

Authors:  Flaviane Cristine Troglio da Silva; Modesto Leite Rolim Neto
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.791

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.