Literature DB >> 32318956

Bone modifying agents for bone loss in patients with aromatase inhibitor as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer; insights from a network meta-analysis.

Hirotaka Miyashita1,2, Sera Satoi3, Toshiki Kuno4, Christina Cruz4, Stephen Malamud5, Se-Min Kim6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The data of head-to-head comparisons of the anti-fracture efficacy of bone modifying agents (BMAs) in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor (AI) are not available. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of different BMAs in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant AI.
METHODS: We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the change of bone mineral densities (BMDs) and the risk of fracture in the selected studies using a random effect model. The primary outcomes are the change of BMD of lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) from the baseline (ΔBMD, %) at 1 and 2 years and the risk of fracture.
RESULTS: We identified and included a total of 16 randomized controlled trials for this analysis. All BMAs included (risedronate, zoledronate, and denosumab) were associated with a significant increase in BMD of LS and TH at 1 and 2 years compared with no upfront treatment group. Among BMAs, zoledronate and denosumab use resulted in significantly higher BMD of LS and TH at 1 and 2 years compared with risedronate. The risk of fracture was significantly lower in the patients who received denosumab or risedronate compared with the patients without upfront treatment (Relative risk (RR) [95% CI] 0.51 [0.38-0.67] and 0.54 [0.35-0.83], respectively).
CONCLUSION: Among the bisphosphonates, zoledronate increased BMD the most, but risedronate, not zoledronate, use was associated with lower risk of fracture. Denosumab increased BMD not only of LS but also of the cortical-bone-rich hip, and showed a significant reduction of fracture risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aromatase inhibitor; Bone mineral density; Bone modifying agents; Fracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318956     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05640-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  4 in total

1.  Real-World Effectiveness of Denosumab and Bisphosphonates on Risk of Vertebral Fractures in Women with Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment with Aromatase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Gherardo Mazziotti; Rebecca Pedersini; Walter Vena; Deborah Cosentini; Flaminia Carrone; Stella Pigni; Edda L Simoncini; Rosalba Torrisi; Alberto Zambelli; Davide Farina; Luca Balzarini; Andrea G Lania; Alfredo Berruti
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss: Role of Denosumab in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Boman Dhabhar
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 3.  UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; David J Armstrong; Jean Bowden; Cyrus Cooper; John Edwards; Neil J L Gittoes; Nicholas Harvey; John Kanis; Sarah Leyland; Rebecca Low; Eugene McCloskey; Katie Moss; Jane Parker; Zoe Paskins; Kenneth Poole; David M Reid; Mike Stone; Julia Thomson; Nic Vine; Juliet Compston
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.879

Review 4.  Updated guidance on the management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in pre- and postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Komal Waqas; Joana Lima Ferreira; Elena Tsourdi; Jean-Jacques Body; Peyman Hadji; M C Zillikens
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.072

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.