Literature DB >> 32318897

A Hybrid Reporting Platform for Extended RadLex Coding Combining Structured Reporting Templates and Natural Language Processing.

Florian Jungmann1, G Arnhold2, B Kämpgen3, T Jorg2, C Düber2, P Mildenberger2, R Kloeckner2.   

Abstract

Structured reporting is a favorable and sustainable form of reporting in radiology. Among its advantages are better presentation, clearer nomenclature, and higher quality. By using MRRT-compliant templates, the content of the categorized items (e.g., select fields) can be automatically stored in a database, which allows further research and quality analytics based on established ontologies like RadLex® linked to the items. Additionally, it is relevant to provide free-text input for descriptions of findings and impressions in complex imaging studies or for the information included with the clinical referral. So far, however, this unstructured content cannot be categorized. We developed a solution to analyze and code these free-text parts of the templates in our MRRT-compliant reporting platform, using natural language processing (NLP) with RadLex® terms in addition to the already categorized items. The established hybrid reporting concept is working successfully. The NLP tool provides RadLex® codes with modifiers (affirmed, speculated, negated). Radiologists can confirm or reject codes provided by NLP before finalizing the structured report. Furthermore, users can suggest RadLex® codes from free text that is not correctly coded with NLP or can suggest to change the modifier. Analyzing free-text fields took 1.23 s on average. Hybrid reporting enables coding of free-text information in our MRRT-compliant templates and thus increases the amount of categorized data that can be stored in the database. This enhances the possibilities for further analyses, such as correlating clinical information with radiological findings or storing high-quality structured information for machine-learning approaches.

Keywords:  Database; Medical informatics; Natural language processing; RadLex; Structured reporting

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318897      PMCID: PMC7522147          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00342-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  27 in total

1.  Quantitative Radiology Reporting in Oncology: Survey of Oncologists and Radiologists.

Authors:  Les R Folio; Chelsye J Nelson; Menashe Benjamin; Ayelet Ran; Guy Engelhard; David A Bluemke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  [Natural language processing in radiology : Neither trivial nor impossible].

Authors:  F Jungmann; S Kuhn; I Tsaur; B Kämpgen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Creating high-quality radiology reports in foreign languages through multilingual structured reporting.

Authors:  L M Sobez; S H Kim; M Angstwurm; S Störmann; D Pförringer; F Schmidutz; D Prezzi; C Kelly-Morland; W H Sommer; B Sabel; D Nörenberg; M Berndt; F Galiè
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder - improvement of report quality?

Authors:  Sebastian Gassenmaier; Marco Armbruster; Florian Haasters; Tobias Helfen; Thomas Henzler; Sedat Alibek; Dominik Pförringer; Wieland H Sommer; Nora N Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  A proof of concept for epidemiological research using structured reporting with pulmonary embolism as a use case.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Sonja Scheibl; Gordon Arnhold; Aline Maehringer-Kunz; Christoph Düber; Peter Mildenberger; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Structured Reporting in Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Johann-Martin Hempel; Peter Mildenberger; Roman Klöckner; Thorsten Persigehl
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2018-08-13

7.  Guidelines Regarding §16 of the German Transplantation Act - Initial Experiences with Structured Reporting.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Gordon Arnhold; Peter Mildenberger; Christoph Düber; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2017-11-03

Review 8.  Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis.

Authors:  Stefania Rizzo; Francesca Botta; Sara Raimondi; Daniela Origgi; Cristiana Fanciullo; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-11-14

Review 9.  Big data, artificial intelligence, and structured reporting.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Bettina Baeßler
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-12-05

10.  External Validation of the STONE Score, a Clinical Prediction Rule for Ureteral Stone: An Observational Multi-institutional Study.

Authors:  Ralph C Wang; Robert M Rodriguez; Michelle Moghadassi; Vicki Noble; John Bailitz; Mike Mallin; Jill Corbo; Tarina L Kang; Phillip Chu; Steve Shiboski; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

2.  Analysis of Radiology Report Recommendation Characteristics and Rate of Recommended Action Performance.

Authors:  Tiantian White; Mark D Aronson; Scot B Sternberg; Umber Shafiq; Seth J Berkowitz; James Benneyan; Russell S Phillips; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.