| Literature DB >> 32318866 |
Ayman Maqsood1,2, Yaoyao Li1,2, Juan Meng1,2, Dandan Song1,2, Bo Qiao1,2, Suling Zhao1,2, Zheng Xu3,4.
Abstract
The utilization of mixed cations is beneficial for taking the advantages of cations and achieving highly efficient perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Herein, the precisely small incorporation of CH(NH2)2 (FA) cations in methyl ammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3) enables the formation of compact, smooth perovskite film with high crystallinity. Consequently, the short-circuit current and the fill factor of the PSCs based on FAxMA1-xPbI3 perovskite are greatly improved, leading to the enhanced device efficiency. The champion PSC based on FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 exhibits a remarkably high efficiency of 22.02%. Furthermore, the PSCs based on FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite also show improved device stability. This work provides a simple approach to fabricate high-quality perovskite films and high-performance PSCs with better stability.Entities:
Keywords: Lead halide perovskite; Mixed cations; Morphology control; Perovskite solar cells
Year: 2020 PMID: 32318866 PMCID: PMC7174521 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-020-03313-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1Schematic structure of perovskite solar cell
Fig. 2Top view SEM images of MAPbI3 (a) and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 (b). Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of standard and modified perovskite on glass substrates. c Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) spectra of both standard and modified perovskite films (d)
Fig. 3XRD patterns (a) for MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite films and enlarged XRD pattern of the peaks at 13–15° (b) and 27–29° (c)
Fig. 4XPS measurement for elements for MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite films. Carbon (a, c). Nitrogen (b, d)
Fig. 5Topography images (a, d), 3D topography images (b, e), and surface potential images (c, f) of MAPbI3 film and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film
Fig. 6Cross-sectional images of MAPbI3 (a) and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 (b) films on the top of ETL/ITO and the absorption spectra (c) of perovskite films
Fig. 7J-V curves (a), dV/dJ vs. (JSC + J)−1 plots with linear fitting curve (b), and ln (JSC + J) vs. (V − RSJ) plots with linear fitting curves for the PSCs based on MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 (c). Corresponding EQE spectra for modified perovskite in comparison with standard PSCs (d)
Photovoltaic characteristics of standard and modified PSCs
| Perovskite layer | Champion | Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | PCE (%) | FF | PCE (%) | |||||
| MAPbI3 | 1.07 | 21.48 | 0.71 | 16.22 | 1.07 | 19.09 | 0.70 | 15.06 |
| FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 | 1.13 | 25.87 | 0.75 | 22.02 | 1.10 | 24.99 | 0.75 | 20.87 |
Fig. 8Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plot for modified perovskite in comparison with standard PSCs (a). Normalized PCE vs. time plots of standard and modified PSCs (b)
Fig. 9Statistics of VOC, FF PCE, and JSC from more than 40 devices for each kind of PSCs (a–d)