Literature DB >> 32318836

Occipitocervical measurements: correlation and consistency between multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic radiographs.

Rattanaporn Chamnan1,2, Kunlavit Chantarasirirat1,3, Permsak Paholpak1,4, Kevin Wiley1, Zorica Buser5,6, Jeffrey C Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging in measuring occipitocervical parameters using the standard cervical dynamic radiographs as a reference.
METHODS: Patients were included if they underwent both dynamic radiograph and cervical multi-positional MRI within a 2-week interval from January 2013 to December 2016. Twelve occipitocervical parameters were measured on both image modalities in all positions (neutral, flexion and extension): Posterior Atlanto-Dental Interval, Anterior Atlanto-Dental Interval (AADI), Dens-to-McRae distance, Dens-to-McGregor distance, Occipito-atlantal Cobb angle (C01 angle), Occipito-axis Cobb angle (C02 Cobb angle), Atlas-axis Cobb angle (C12 angle), Redlund-Johnell, Modified Ranawat, Clivus canal angle, Occiput inclination, and Occiput cervical distance. Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis were used to evaluate the correlation of both modalities for each parameter. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Cervical images of 70 patients were measured and analyzed. There was a significant positive correlation between dynamic X-ray and multi-positional MRI for all parameters (p < 0.05) except AADI. Dens-to-McGregor distance and Redlund-Johnell parameter demonstrated a very strong correlation in the neutral position (r = 0.72, r = 0.79 respectively) and moderate to very strong correlation(r > 0.4) for Modified Ranawat, Clivus canal angle, C02 Cobb angle and C02 distance in all neck position. The intra-class correlation (ICC) of intra- and inter-observer showed good to excellent reliability, and ICCs were 0.67-0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: Multi-positional MRI can be a reliable imaging option for diagnosis of occipitocervical instability or basilar invagination compared to standard dynamic radiographs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic radiograph; Multi-positional MRI; Occipitocervical instability; Occipitocervical parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318836     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06415-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  5 in total

1.  Occipitalization of the atlas.

Authors:  D L MCRAE; A S BARNUM
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1953-07

2.  Normal values of cervical vertebral measurements according to age and sex in CT.

Authors:  Serhad Omercikoglu; Erhan Altunbas; Haldun Akoglu; Ozge Onur; Arzu Denizbasi
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 3.  Systematic review of flexion/extension radiography of the cervical spine in trauma patients.

Authors:  J C Sierink; W A M van Lieshout; L F M Beenen; N W L Schep; W P Vandertop; J C Goslings
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  The risk of carcinogenesis from radiographs to pediatric orthopaedic patients.

Authors:  C M Bone; G H Hsieh
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Kinematic relationship between missed ligamentum flavum bulge and degenerative factors in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Guibin Zhong; Zorica Buser; Lifeng Lao; Ruofeng Yin; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.166

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.