Literature DB >> 32318796

Profile of severely growth-restricted births undelivered at 40 weeks in Western Australia.

Helen D Bailey1, Akilew A Adane2, Brad M Farrant2, Scott W White3,4, Pia Hardelid5, Carrington C J Shepherd2,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the proportion of severely growth-restricted singleton births < 3rd percentile (proxy for severe fetal growth restriction; FGR) undelivered at 40 weeks (FGR_40), and compare maternal characteristics and outcomes of FGR_40 births and FGR births at 37-39 weeks' (FGR_37-39) to those not born small-for-gestational-age at term (Not SGA_37+).
METHODS: The annual rates of singleton FGR_40 births from 2006 to 2015 were calculated using data from linked Western Australian population health datasets. Using 2013-2015 data, maternal factors associated with FGR births were investigated using multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) while relative risks (RR) of birth outcomes between each group were calculated using Poisson regression. Neonatal adverse outcomes were identified using a published composite indicator (diagnoses, procedures and other factors).
RESULTS: The rate of singleton FGR_40 births decreased by 23.0% between 2006 and 2015. Factors strongly associated with FGR_40 and FGR_37-39 births compared to Not SGA_37+ births included the mother being primiparous (ORs 3.13: 95% CI 2.59-3.79; 1.69, 95% CI 1.47, 1.94, respectively) and ante-natal smoking (ORs 2.55, 95% CI 1.97, 3.32; 4.48, 95% CI 3.74, 5.36, respectively). FGR_40 and FGR_37-39 infants were more likely to have a neonatal adverse outcome (RRs 1.70, 95% CI 1.41, 2.06 and 2.46 95% CI 2.18, 2.46, respectively) compared to Not SGA 37+ infants.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of poor perinatal outcomes among FGR births highlight the importance of appropriate management including fetal growth monitoring. Regular population-level monitoring of FGR_40 rates may lead to reduced numbers of poor outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fetal growth restriction; Infant; Perinatal mortality; Western Australia; small for gestational age

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318796     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05537-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  29 in total

1.  Does the Presence of Risk Factors for Fetal Growth Restriction Increase the Probability of Antenatal Detection? A French National Study.

Authors:  Isabelle Monier; Béatrice Blondel; Anne Ego; Monique Kaminski; François Goffinet; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?

Authors:  P G Lindqvist; J Molin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  David J P Barker
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 4.  Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Javier Caradeux; Raigam J Martinez-Portilla; Anna Peguero; Alexandros Sotiriadis; Francesc Figueras
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study.

Authors:  Julia Unterscheider; Sean Daly; Michael Patrick Geary; Mairead Mary Kennelly; Fionnuala Mary McAuliffe; Keelin O'Donoghue; Alyson Hunter; John Joseph Morrison; Gerard Burke; Patrick Dicker; Elizabeth Catherine Tully; Fergal Desmond Malone
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Perinatal mortality by birthweight centile.

Authors:  Julia H Francis; Michael Permezel; Mary Ann Davey
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 7.  Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy.

Authors:  Lesley M McCowan; Francesc Figueras; Ngaire H Anderson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Neonatal Morbidity of Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates Born at Term in Uncomplicated Pregnancies.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Madeline Murguia Rice; William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Neurodevelopmental outcome of full-term small-for-gestational-age infants with normal placental function.

Authors:  S Savchev; M Sanz-Cortes; R Cruz-Martinez; A Arranz; F Botet; E Gratacos; F Figueras
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study.

Authors:  Jason Gardosi; Vichithranie Madurasinghe; Mandy Williams; Asad Malik; André Francis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.