Literature DB >> 32318777

Cyclosporine A prevents cardiac arrest-induced acute respiratory failure: a post-hoc analysis of the CYRUS trial.

Louis Kreitmann1,2, Laurent Argaud1,2,3, Michel Ovize2,3,4, Martin Cour5,6,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318777      PMCID: PMC7224096          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06043-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Accumulating evidence suggests that hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) is independently associated with poor outcomes in patients successfully resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) [1]. This finding opens new therapeutic perspectives, targeting lung injury, to improve the prognosis of OHCA patients. Experimentally, Cyclosporine A (CsA) has been shown to prevent systemic inflammation-induced ARF [2, 3]. To investigate the effect of CsA on ARF in the clinical setting, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the prospective, multicenter, randomized CsA in OHCA resuscitation (CYRUS) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01595958). The CYRUS trial failed to demonstrate a significant decrease in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at 24 h after nonshockable OHCA in patients receiving a prehospital single injection of 2.5 mg/kg CsA [4]. All the 129 patients alive at 24 h included in the intention-to-treat analysis (67 in the CsA group and 62 in the control group) were analyzed in the present post-hoc analysis (without correction for multiple comparison), in which the primary endpoint was the occurrence of ARF at 24 h, as defined by a SOFA respiratory sub-score > 2. The CsA effect was adjusted for history of respiratory disease, respiratory cause of OHCA and for relevant variables with p < 0.1 after univariate analysis. Patient’s and OHCA’s characteristics were well matched between the two groups (Table 1). At admission, both the median (interquartile) ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) and the percentage of patients with ARF did not significantly differ between the CsA and the control groups: 211 (133–319) versus 207 (131–318) mmHg and 34.3% versus 32.3%, respectively. At 24 h, ARF was significantly less frequent in the CsA group (29.8%) compared to the control group (54.8%) and median PaO2/FiO2 was 68 mmHg higher in the CsA group (Table 1). Patients treated with CsA were also less likely to fulfill criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (Table 1). Importantly, CsA was still independently associated with a lower risk for ARF after multivariate analysis (OR 0.33; 95%CI [0.16–0.70], p  < 0.01) (Supplementary Table 1). This result was confirmed in the per-protocol population of the CYRUS trial (i.e. 61 patients who actually received CsA and 68 patients who did not) by both univariate analysis (ARF in 33% versus 50% of patients, respectively, p  < 0.05) and multivariate analysis (OR 0.42; 95%CI [0.20–0.88], p  = 0.02).
Table 1

OHCA-induced acute respiratory failure

Cyclosporine group (n = 67)Control group (n = 62)p-value
Patients
 Age (years)62.1 (52.9–72.7)63.5 (53.8–72.3)0.651
 Male42 (67.2)47 (75.8)0.332
 History of respiratory disease10 (14.9)8 (12.9)0.741
 History of cardiac disease36 (53.7)35 (56.4)0.756
OHCA
 Arrest at place of residence40 (59.7)46 (74.2)0.119
 Respiratory cause22 (32.8)22 (35.5)0.751
 Cardiac cause33 (49.3)24 (38.7)0.228
 Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation31 (46.3)26 (41.9)0.723
 Duration of untreated cardiac arrest (min)8 (5–12)10 (4–14)0.340
 Time from collapse to ROSC (min)35 (27–46)32 (24–41)0.358
 Target temperature management51 (76)44 (71)0.550
Cardiovascular dysfunction at 24 h
  Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)75 (64–91)79 (63–89) > 0.99
  Heart rate (beats per min)95 (75–112)91 (75–105)0.464
  Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)50 (30–65)55 (40–60)0.899
  Vasoactive drugs43 (64.2)39 (62.9)0.880
Respiratory dysfunction at 24 h
 Mechanical ventilation67 (100)62 (100)N/A
 Ventilator settings
  FiO2 (%)40 (35–60)50 (40–70)0.230
  PEEP (cmH2O)5 (4–6)5 (5–6)0.278
  Tidal volume (mL/kg)6.6 (6.1–8.2)6.4 (5.8–7.9)0.593
  Minute ventilation (L/min)10.6 (8.5–12.6)10.7 (7.8–12.8)0.749
 Sedation/curarization42 (62.7)30 (48.4)0.102
 Chest quadrants with infiltrates2 (1–3)2 (1–4)0.522
 Arterial blood gases
  pH7.32 (7.24–7.41)7.36 (7.29–7.43)0.116
   PaCO2 (mmHg)36 (31–42)35 (32–41)0.914
   PaO2 (mmHg)104 (82–135)91 (77–121)0.103
   PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)*255 (180–337)187 (125–304)0.021
  Lactate (mmol/L)2.8 (1.7–4.5)3.0 (1.9–5.1)0.603
 Acute respiratory failure20 (29.8)34 (54.8)0.019
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome5 (7.4%)11 (17.7%)0.108

Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (%) and compared using Wilcoxon, chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate

OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, ROSC restoration of spontaneous circulation, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment score, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, PaCO arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PaO/FiO ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fractional inspired oxygen

*Imputed, if needed, using adjusted pulse saturation of oxygen (SpO2) to FiO2 ratio (n = 2 patients in the control group)

†Defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 mmHg in mechanically ventilated patients

‡Defined according to Berlin criteria

OHCA-induced acute respiratory failure Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (%) and compared using Wilcoxon, chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, ROSC restoration of spontaneous circulation, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment score, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, PaCO arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PaO/FiO ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fractional inspired oxygen *Imputed, if needed, using adjusted pulse saturation of oxygen (SpO2) to FiO2 ratio (n = 2 patients in the control group) †Defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 mmHg in mechanically ventilated patients ‡Defined according to Berlin criteria We report here the first clinical data suggesting that CsA might limit the severity of ARF at 24 h following OHCA. Even though this post-hoc analysis of the CYRUS trial does not provide mechanistic insight, our findings are in line with both experimental and clinical studies reporting potent protective effects of CsA against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury [1, 2, 3, 5]. CsA may indeed limit I/R-induced cellular damages by inhibiting the cyclophilin D-dependent opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and by preserving oxidative phosphorylation [5]. In acute lung injury models, cytoprotection was also attributed to a decrease in circulating mitochondrial pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic factors [2, 3]. Studies are now needed to examine the longer-term effects of CsA on lung injury, which could not be done here due to high early mortality rate. In conclusion, the present study identified CsA as a potential new therapeutic strategy to prevent cardiac arrest-induced ARF. This finding will need further confirmation. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 kb)
  5 in total

1.  Effect of Cyclosporine in Nonshockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The CYRUS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Laurent Argaud; Martin Cour; Pierre-Yves Dubien; François Giraud; Claire Jossan; Benjamin Riche; Romain Hernu; Michael Darmon; Yves Poncelin; Xavier Tchénio; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Marc Freysz; Cyrille Kamga; Pascal Beuret; Pascal Usseglio; Michel Badet; Bastien Anette; Kevin Chaulier; Emel Alasan; Sonia Sadoune; Xavier Bobbia; Fabrice Zéni; Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud; Dominique Robert; Pascal Roy; Michel Ovize
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  A Mechanism Study Underlying the Protective Effects of Cyclosporine-A on Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Jian''an Li; Zhongya Yan; Qianjin Fang
Journal:  Pharmacology       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.547

3.  Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition to prevent the post-cardiac arrest syndrome: a pre-clinical study.

Authors:  Martin Cour; Joseph Loufouat; Mélanie Paillard; Lionel Augeul; Joëlle Goudable; Michel Ovize; Laurent Argaud
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  The acute respiratory distress syndrome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas J Johnson; Ellen Caldwell; David J Carlbom; David F Gaieski; Matthew E Prekker; Thomas D Rea; Michael Sayre; Catherine L Hough
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Attenuation of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Cyclosporine-A via Suppression of Mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Zhenghua Xiao; Bangsheng Jia; Xueshan Zhao; Siwei Bi; Wei Meng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-27
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cyclosporine A: a valid candidate to treat COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure?

Authors:  Martin Cour; Michel Ovize; Laurent Argaud
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Cyclosporine A plus low-dose steroid treatment in COVID-19 improves clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe disease: A pilot study.

Authors:  J L Gálvez-Romero; O Palmeros-Rojas; F A Real-Ramírez; S Sánchez-Romero; R Tome-Maxil; M P Ramírez-Sandoval; R Olivos-Rodríguez; S E Flores-Encarnación; A A Cabrera-Estrada; J Ávila-Morales; V Cortés-Sánchez; G Sarmiento-Padilla; S E Tezmol-Ramírez; D Aparicio-Hernández; M I Urbina-Sánchez; M Á Gómez-Pluma; S Cisneros-Méndez; D I Rodríguez-Rivas; S Reyes-Inurrigarro; G Cortés-Díaz; C Cruz-Delgado; J Navarro-González; J Deveaux-Homs; S Pedraza-Sánchez
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 13.068

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.