| Literature DB >> 32318634 |
Shiful Islam1, Sadaqur Rahman1, Tangigul Haque1, Abu Hasan Sumon1, Az Mahbub Ahmed2, Nurshad Ali1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major public health concern affecting millions of people worldwide. The relationship between liver enzymes and T2D has been reported in limited studies; however, there is still a lack of evidence for the Bangladeshi population. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of elevated liver enzymes and examine its association with the prevalence of T2D in Bangladeshi adults.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladeshi adults; liver enzymes; prevalence; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32318634 PMCID: PMC7170449 DOI: 10.1002/edm2.116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ISSN: 2398-9238
Baseline characteristics of the nondiabetic and diabetic participants
| Variables | Nondiabetes | Diabetes |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 160 | 110 | ‐ |
| Gender [n (%)] | |||
| Male | 124 (64.6) | 68 (35.4) | .000 |
| Female | 36 (46.2) | 42 (53.8) | |
| Age (yrs) | 36.4 ± 17.0 | 47.2 ± 12.2 | .000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.0 ± 3.8 | 25.1 ± 3.8 | .048 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 101.1 ± 13.5 | 212.1 ± 62.9 | .000 |
| ALT (U/L) | 28.0 ± 12.7 | 32.4 ± 14.6 | .028 |
| AST (U/L) | 27.9 ± 9.9 | 34.1 ± 15.7 | .001 |
| ALP (U/L) | 89.3 ± 30.2 | 109.2 ± 50.7 | .001 |
| GGT (U/L) | 25.6 ± 14.8 | 43.5 ± 38.2 | .000 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 151.2 ± 87.2 | 233.1 ± 149.9 | .000 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 191.0 ± 59.4 | 281.1 ± 119.9 | .000 |
| Albumin (mg/dL) | 48.8 ± 12.1 | 46.1 ± 15.9 | .194 |
| Total protein (mg/dL) | 78.3 ± 25.6 | 78.3 ± 30.5 | .983 |
| Smoking status (%) | |||
| Yes | 20.6 | 20.4 | .979 |
| No | 79.4 | 79.6 | |
| Physical activity (%) | |||
| Low | 18.7 | 23.5 | .257 |
| Medium | 72.9 | 71.4 | |
| High | 8.4 | 5.1 | |
Data are presented as mean ± SD. P‐values are obtained from independent sample t test in comparison between nondiabetes and diabetes group. χ2‐test was applied for categorical variables.
Figure 1Levels of ALT (A), AST (B), ALP (C) and GGT (D) in nondiabetes and diabetes group by gender. The scale in the y‐axis is not similar for all liver enzymes. a P < .01 when comparing mean levels of ALT and AST in females with diabetes vs. females without diabetes. b P < .05 when comparing mean level of GGT in females with diabetes vs. females without diabetes. c P < .01 when comparing mean level of ALP in males with diabetes vs. males without diabetes and d P < .001 when comparing mean level of GGT in males with diabetes vs. males without diabetes
Prevalence of elevated liver enzymes in the nondiabetes and diabetes group by gender
| Nondiabetes | Diabetes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (%) | Female (%) | Male (%) | Female (%) | |
| ALT | ||||
| Elevated | 14.1 | 10.0 | 11.1 | 33.3 |
| Normal | 85.9 | 90.0 | 88.9 | 66.7 |
| AST | ||||
| Elevated | 22.1 | 21.1 | 25.0 | 50.0 |
| Normal | 77.9 | 78.9 | 75.0 | 50.0 |
| ALP | ||||
| Elevated | 9.6 | 22.2 | 36.0 | 38.5 |
| Normal | 90.4 | 77.8 | 64.0 | 61.5 |
| GGT | ||||
| Elevated | 5.9 | 5.0 | 21.2 | 37.9 |
| Normal | 94.1 | 95.0 | 78.8 | 62.1 |
Figure 2Prevalence of elevated liver enzymes (ie levels higher than the reference levels) in nondiabetes and diabetes group. *P < .01 and **P < .001 when compared to the nondiabetes group
Correlation between hepatic markers and baseline characteristics of the participants
| ALT | AST | ALP | GGT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation ( |
| Correlation ( |
| Correlation ( |
| Correlation ( |
| |
| Age | .016 | .822 | .150 | .038 | .038 | .613 | .143 | .048 |
| BMI | .122 | .090 | .144 | .047 | .041 | .578 | .108 | .138 |
| Glucose | .138 | .049 | .196 | .007 | .265 | .000 | .224 | .001 |
| TG | .311 | .000 | .278 | .001 | .144 | .079 | .465 | .000 |
| TC | .180 | .028 | .286 | .000 | .134 | .103 | .269 | .001 |
| Albumin | −.108 | .136 | −.171 | .018 | −.030 | .694 | −.081 | .268 |
| Total protein | .197 | .006 | .023 | .751 | .067 | .382 | .168 | .020 |
Correlation was analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficient test (two‐tailed).
Association of liver enzymes with diabetes
| ALT | AST | ALP | GGT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Model 1 | 1.03 (1.00‐1.06) | .021 | 1.03 (1.00‐1.06) | .027 | 1.01 (1.00‐1.02) | .003 | 1.04 (1.02‐1.06) | .001 |
| Model 2 | 1.03 (1.00‐1.05) | .043 | 1.03 (1.00‐1.06) | .060 | 1.01 (1.01‐1.02) | .007 | 1.04 (1.01‐1.06) | .001 |
| Model 3 | 1.03 (1.00‐1.05) | .048 | 1.03 (1.00‐1.06) | .046 | 1.01 (1.00‐1.02) | .009 | 1.03 (1.00‐1.06) | .001 |
| Model 4 | 1.01 (0.97‐1.06) | .548 | 0.99 (0.96‐1.03) | .665 | 1.00 (0.99‐1.02) | .181 | 1.02 (1.00‐1.04) | .039 |
Multinomial logistic regression analysis was applied to evaluate the associations between liver enzymes and T2D.
Model 1: adjusted for age and sex.
Model 2: Model 1 plus BMI, albumin and total protein.
Model 3: Model 2 plus smoking status and physical activity.
Model 4: Model 3 plus TG and TC.