Literature DB >> 32318489

Determination of association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and carotid artery atherosclerosis among nondiabetic individuals.

Vijay Rampally1, SaiRavi Kiran Biri2, Indu K Nair3, Arvind Vadlakonda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a condition characterized by the infiltration of fat in the liver cells. High levels of fat in the liver associated with increased risk of diseases like diabetes, high blood pressure and kidney disease, high cholesterol, metabolic syndrome. AIM AND
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between NAFLD and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) among nondiabetic individuals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 in-patients and outpatients (45 NAFL subjects and 45 patients with the normal liver as controls) with NAFL on abdomen ultrasound scan from Bangalore Baptist Hospital were included in our study. All the participants were subjected to a doppler study for carotid intima thickness and a blood sample (4 ml) was collected from all the subjects.
RESULTS: In this study, there is an elevated level of BMI, weight, dyslipidemia in NAFLD compared with controls. The present study suggests that cardiovascular risk factors such as increased carotid intima-media thickness occur more frequently among NAFLD patients compared to healthy individuals.
CONCLUSION: We can conclude that NAFL has a significant association with higher cardiovascular risk in terms of carotid intima-media thickness, dyslipidemia, and hypoalphalipidemia. Lifestyle changes include weight loss, dietary changes, reduction of sedentary habits and physical exercise are recommended in the NAFL disease subjects with higher BMI and weight. Copyright: © Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disorders; carotid intima media thickness; diabetes; dyslipidemia; nonalcoholic fatty liver

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318489      PMCID: PMC7113986          DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_957_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care        ISSN: 2249-4863


Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a condition characterized by the infiltration of fat in the liver cells. Mainly seen in people who are overweight or obese. NAFLD is seen in the people who are not abused by alcohol. NAFLD initially harmless but leads to liver damage and cirrhosis if the condition gets worse. High levels of fat in the liver associated with increased risk of diseases like diabetes, high blood pressure and kidney disease, high cholesterol, and metabolic syndrome (MetS).[1] NAFLD leads to elevated levels of liver enzymes. In western countries, the prevalence rate of NAFLD is 30% whereas in Asia-pacific nations; it is up to 5-30% rises to 80-90% in obese adults, 30-50% in diabetic patients, and 90% in hyperlipidemia. It affects 3-10% of children and 40-70% of obese children.[2] Atherosclerosis is a condition characterized by the hardening and narrowing of arteries. It leads to heart attacks, strokes and peripheral vascular diseases together called cardiovascular disease. Many studies have shown that there is an association between NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases. So, it is important to predict whether NAFLD is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.[345678] Increased carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) is an early indicator of cardiovascular diseases.[91011] In some studies, mean CIMT ranges from 0.64 ± 0.10 mm to 1.24 ± 0.13 mm in NAFLD patients[12] carotid atherosclerosis screening should be recommended in all NAFLD patients. Currently available epidemiological data indicate that a value of CIMT at or above 1 mm at any age is associated with a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular disease.[11] In our study, we selected a random group of consecutive outpatients and in-patients undergoing abdominal USG. In addition, we evaluated whether any association is independent of classical risk factors and mass features.

Materials and Methods

A total of 90 in-patients and out-patients (45 NAFL subjects and 45 patients with the normal liver as controls) on the abdomen ultrasound scan (USG scan) from the Department of Radiology, Bangalore Baptist Hospital were included in our study. The study was done after obtaining informed consent from the patients and institutional ethical committee clearance. A detailed history regarding smoking, alcohol consumption, calorie intake, etc., were collected from the patients by administering a questionnaire. Patients under the age of 65 with normal liver and who do not consume alcohol were included in our study.

Exclusion criteria for both the study and control group

Patients with any clinical evidence of cirrhosis or other causes of chronic liver disease, History of alcohol consumption, Smoking, Viral hepatitis, Autoimmune hepatitis, Dyslipidemia, Hemochromatosis, Use of hepatotoxic medications (ATT, antiepileptics, and steroids), Type 2 diabetes mellitus. All the participants were subjected to the doppler study for carotid intima media thickness. An experienced radiologist to prevent variance did the carotid doppler. BMI, height, weight, pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were recorded. Blood samples (4 ml) were drawn from all the subjects following a fast of 12 hours and analyzed for Serum Triglycerides (TG), Total cholesterol (TC) and High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) by enzymatic methods with the help of Glaxo kits on ERBA Chem- 5 semi auto analyzer. Serum Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) was calculated by Frederickson-Friedwald's formula according to which LDL cholesterol = Total cholesterol - (HDL cholesterol + VLDL cholesterol).

Statistical analysis

All values expressed as Mean ± standard deviation (SD). An independent t-test was used to test the significance of the difference in means between the study group and controls. A Chi-square test for independence is used to determine the relationship between two variables of a sample. A P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The statistical software namely SPSS 16.0 were used for the analysis of the data and Microsoft word and excel have been used to generate tables.

Results

The present study was conducted with 45 NAFL subjects and 45 patients with the normal liver as controls in the department of radiology. The average age of NAFL subjects was 44.87 ± 10.58 years. The oldest subject was 65 years and the youngest being 21 years. Among the study group, 26 were males and 19 were females in NAFLD patients whereas 28 were males and 17 were females in the control group. Height (cm), weight (kg), Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) and waist circumferences (cm) were compared between NAFLD and control group. Pulse rate (bpm), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), diastole blood pressure (mmHg) were compared with the control group [Table 1].
Table 1

Association between NAFLD and the control group

VariableGroupMean±SDtP
Height (cm)Normal166±8.40.8730.385
Fatty liver167±6.9
Weight (kg)Normal69±123.5690.001*
Fatty liver77±9.18
BMINormal25±2.63.4960.001*
Fatty liver27±2.3
Waist circumference (cm)Normal87±6.50.9580.341
Fatty liver86±7.8
Pulse rate (bpm)Normal82±9.10.8530.396
Fatty liver80±9.1
Systolic BP (mmHg)Normal128±150.0540.95
Fatty liver128±22
Diastolic BP (mmHg)Normal75±9.30.1720.864
Fatty liver76±10

*Statistically significant. NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, SD=Standard deviation, BMI=Body mass index, bpm=Beats per minute, BP=Blood pressure

Association between NAFLD and the control group *Statistically significant. NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, SD=Standard deviation, BMI=Body mass index, bpm=Beats per minute, BP=Blood pressure Table 1 depicts mean height in the control group was 166 ± 8.4 cm and the study group was 167 ± 6.9 cm. The mean waist circumference in the control group was 87 ± 6.5 cm and the study group was 86 ± 7.8 cm. In terms of height and waist circumference in relation to NAFLD, there was no statistical significance noted. The mean BMI in the control group was 25 ± 2.6 kg/m2, wherein the study group was 27 ± 2.3 kg/m2. There was a significant association between NAFLD and higher BMI in the study group, which was lacking in the control group, with a significant P = 0.01. The mean weight in the control group was 69 ± 12 kg wherein the study group was 77 ± 9.18 kg. The study and the control group were statistically comparable in terms of higher weight associated with NAFLD with a significant P = 0.01. The mean systolic blood pressure (in mm of Hg) in the control group was 128 ± 15 and the study group was 128 ± 22 and diastolic blood pressure (in mm of hg) in the control group was 75 ± 9.3 and study group was 76 ± 10. In terms of systolic and diastolic blood pressures in relation to NAFLD, there was no statistical significance noted. Table 2 depicts the control group mean right CIMT (in mm) was 0.54 ± 0.109 whereas in the study group it was 0.62 ± 0.150 and mean left CIMT (in mm) of the control group was 0.53 ± 0.108 whereas in the study group it was 0.65 ± 0.205. The study and the control group were statistically comparable in terms of CIMT in relation to NAFLD with a significant P value of 0.05 and 0.01 respectively.
Table 2

Association between NAFLD and CIMT

VariableGroupMean±SDtP
Average right CIMT (mm)Normal0.54±0.1092.8630.005*
Fatty liver0.62±0.150
Average left CIMT (mm)Normal0.53±0.1083.3560.001*
Fatty liver0.65±0.205

*Statistically significant. NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, CIMT=Carotid intima media thickness, SD=Standard deviation

Association between NAFLD and CIMT *Statistically significant. NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, CIMT=Carotid intima media thickness, SD=Standard deviation Table 3 depicts the control group mean total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides (in mg/dl) was 109 ± 32, 23 ± 8.4, 77 ± 24 and 197 ± 152 and in study group, it was 139 ± 57, 31 ± 13, 98 ± 42 and 169 ± 72 respectively. The study and the control group were statistically comparable in terms of dyslipidemia i.e. higher total cholesterol, HDL, LDL in relation to NAFLD with a significant P value of 0.04, 0.01 and 0.01 respectively.
Table 3

Association between lipid profile of NAFLD and the control group

VariableGroupMean±SDtP
Total cholesterolNormal109±322.9680.004*
Fatty liver139±57
HDLNormal23±8.43.4670.001*
Fatty liver31±13
LDLNormal77±243.4670.001*
Fatty liver98±42
TriglyceridesNormal197±1521.1150.268
Fatty liver169±72

*Statistically significant. NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, SD=Standard deviation, HDL=High density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL=Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

Association between lipid profile of NAFLD and the control group *Statistically significant. NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, SD=Standard deviation, HDL=High density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL=Low density lipoprotein cholesterol Table 4 depicts the prevalence of significant CIMT changes is higher in fatty liver subjects (13%) as compared to normal liver subjects (2%), which was statistically significant (P = 0.04). The prevalence of fatty liver is more in males (58%) as compared to females (42%).
Table 4

Prevalence of significant CIMT in NAFLD

CIMTFatty (n=45)Normal (n=45)Chi-squareP
<0.9 mm39 (87%)44 (98%)3.8730.049*
>0.9 mm06 (13%)01 (2%)

*Statistically significant. CIMT=Carotid intima media thickness, NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Prevalence of significant CIMT in NAFLD *Statistically significant. CIMT=Carotid intima media thickness, NAFLD=Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Discussion

The present study includes nondiabetic outpatients and in-patients undergoing abdominal USG assessment for health screening. It was observed that people with fatty liver with or without other features of the metabolic syndrome had significant CIMT. These findings not only support the view of NAFLD as a hepatic manifestation of MetS but also suggest that the hepatic fat accumulation is atherogenic saying that NAFLD has associated carotid artery atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular morbidity and the risk of strokes. Some studies show that NAFLD is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.[13] Some hypothetical studies say that NAFLD is not only a marker of cardiovascular disease but may also be involved in its pathogenesis.[14] In previous studies, the association between NAFLD and CIMT has currently had already been reported. Targhee et al.[3] found a significant increase in carotid IMT in NAFLD nonobese healthy volunteers whereas in another study, there is an association between NAFLD and carotid IMT concerned only the patients with MetS.[8] The following table gives information about 1947 patients Data analysis showed the subject with NAFLD is 35% of pathological CIMT whereas patients without NAFLD, subclinical atherosclerosis was detected as 21.8%, P < 0.0001. Three of the four studies found a relationship between NAFLD and pathological CIMT [Table 5].
Table 5

Studies included in meta-analysis, according to subclinical atherosclerosis

International studiesYear (of publishing)Number of patientsNAFLD evaluationCarotid phenotypeOR score (95% CI)Country
Kim et al.[8]20091021UltrasoundCIMT2.15 (1.56-2.96)South Korea
Wang et al.[15]2009169UltrasoundCIMT1.45 (0.67-3.15)Taiwan
Kang et al.[16]2012663UltrasoundCIMT1.98 (1.14-2.73)South Korea
Agarwal et al.[17]2011179UltrasoundCIMT2.48 (1.07-5.06)India

NAFL=Nonalcoholic fatty liver, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval, CIMT=Carotid intima media thickness

Studies included in meta-analysis, according to subclinical atherosclerosis NAFL=Nonalcoholic fatty liver, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval, CIMT=Carotid intima media thickness In our study, there is an elevated level of BMI, weight, dyslipidemia in NAFLD compared with controls [P = 0.01] [Table 1] which is similar to the study of Ji. Hoon Kang et al. as he says there is a significantly higher BMI, BP, and liver enzymes C-reactive protein. In our study, we found NAFLD was independently associated with CIMT [Table 2]. Those with NAFLD had a higher prevalence of increased CIMT in compassion with controls. These results are supported by previous perspective studies reporting a strong association between NAFLD[18192021] and incidence of CID in both diabetic and nondiabetic individuals.[222324] In our study, we found the incidence of Metabolic Syndrome was higher in males when compared with females. The relation between NAFLD and MetS has not shown statistically significant. Our study suggests that cardiovascular risk factors such as increased CIMT occur more frequently among NAFLD patients compared to healthy individuals. Primary care physicians and specialists have a great role in the management of NAFLD patients with proper care can avoid CVD with the help of measurement of CIM thickness. According to the current scenario, the most common death in NAFLD is CVD23. Hence, this study finding would help the primary care physicians to better understanding the role of measurement CIMT can avoid CVD deaths in NAFLD patients. Primary care Physicians and specialists should consider measurement CIMT should consider the best diagnostic method.[21]

Conclusion

We can conclude that NAFLD has a significant association with higher cardiovascular risk in terms of CIMT, Dyslipidemia and Hypoalphalipidemia. We recommend screening of all NAFLD patients for the above risk factors and advise accordingly. Lifestyle changes include weight loss, dietary changes, reduction of sedentary habits and physical exercise are recommended in the NAFLD subjects with higher BMI and weight.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.
  20 in total

1.  A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference.

Authors:  Vlad Ratziu; Stefano Bellentani; Helena Cortez-Pinto; Chris Day; Giulio Marchesini
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is independently associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Targher; Lorenzo Bertolini; Stefano Rodella; Roberto Tessari; Luciano Zenari; Giuseppe Lippi; Guido Arcaro
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a feature of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  G Marchesini; M Brizi; G Bianchi; S Tomassetti; E Bugianesi; M Lenzi; A J McCullough; S Natale; G Forlani; N Melchionda
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.461

4.  Hepatic steatosis is associated with an increased risk of carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Henry Volzke; Daniel-M Robinson; Volker Kleine; Roland Deutscher; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Jan Ludemann; Ulf Schminke; Christof Kessler; Ulrich John
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Liver markers and development of the metabolic syndrome: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study.

Authors:  Anthony J G Hanley; Ken Williams; Andreas Festa; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Ralph B D'Agostino; Steven M Haffner
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 6.  Recent concepts in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  L A Adams; P Angulo
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and carotid intima-media thickness according to the presence of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Hyeon Chang Kim; Dae Jung Kim; Kap Bum Huh
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 5.162

8.  Incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ranendra Hajong; Malaya Ranjan Dhal; Narang Naku; Buru Kapa
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

9.  Biochemical markers and lipid profile in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients in the PERSIAN Guilan cohort study (PGCS), Iran.

Authors:  Roya Mansour-Ghanaei; Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei; Mohammadreza Naghipour; Farahnaz Joukar
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-03

10.  Relationship between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis Beyond Metabolic Disorders in Non-Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Kang; Kyoung Im Cho; Seong Man Kim; Ja Young Lee; Jae Joon Kim; Ja Jun Goo; Kyoung Nyoun Kim; Joon Hyung Jhi; Dong Jun Kim; Hyeon Gook Lee; Tae Ik Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-09-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increases risk of carotid atherosclerosis and ischemic stroke: An updated meta-analysis with 135,602 individuals.

Authors:  Ansel Shao Pin Tang; Kai En Chan; Jingxuan Quek; Jieling Xiao; Phoebe Tay; Margaret Teng; Keng Siang Lee; Snow Yunni Lin; May Zin Myint; Benjamin Tan; Vijay K Sharma; Darren Jun Hao Tan; Wen Hui Lim; Apichat Kaewdech; Daniel Huang; Nicholas Ws Chew; Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui; Arun J Sanyal; Mark Muthiah; Cheng Han Ng
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2022-03-02

Review 2.  Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and Atherosclerosis: Explaining Their Pathophysiology, Association and the Role of Incretin-Based Drugs.

Authors:  Eleftheria Galatou; Elena Mourelatou; Sophia Hatziantoniou; Ioannis S Vizirianakis
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Korean cohort study.

Authors:  Hyeok-Hee Lee; Yongin Cho; Young Ju Choi; Byung Wook Huh; Byung-Wan Lee; Eun Seok Kang; Seok Won Park; Bong-Soo Cha; Eun Jig Lee; Yong-Ho Lee; Kap Bum Huh
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 9.951

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.