| Literature DB >> 32318432 |
Soumit Roy1, Sayanti Bandyopadhyay1, Lina Bandyopadhyay1, Aparajita Dasgupta1, Bobby Paul1, Shamita Mandal1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary preferences and childhood eating behavior has marked influence on nutritional status of children. The objective of the study was to find out eating behavior of primary school children in a rural area of West Bengal using Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire and to determine association of body mass index (BMI) with eating behavior.Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; CEBQ; children; nutritional status; primary school
Year: 2020 PMID: 32318432 PMCID: PMC7114006 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_965_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Figure 1Box plot showing distribution of CEBQ scores among study participants [n = 142]
Figure 2Distribution of study participants according to their BMI [n = 142]
Univariate logistic regression showing association of unsatisfactory scores of CEBQ sub scales with sociodemographic characteristics of study participants (n=142)
| [EF] OR | [EOE] OR | [SR] OR | [SE] OR | [DD] OR | [FF] OR | [EUE] OR | [FR] OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age ↑ | 0.79 * | 1.23* | 0.88 | 0.97 | 0.72* | 1.18 | 0.79* | 0.83 | |
| Education of father↑ | 1.11 * | 0.97 | 1.04 | 1.12 | 1.19* | 1.03 | 1.12* | 1.05 | |
| PCI | ≤2000 | 0.42 * | 2.52* | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.15* | 0.75 | 0.67 | 1.03 |
| >2000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Education of mother↑ | 1.18 | 0.64* | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.38* | 0.96 | 1.21 | 1.03 | |
| Occupation of mothers | Home maker | 0.61 | 1.18 | 1.01 | 1.33 | 1.03 | 1.8 | 0.67 | 1.25 |
| Others | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
*P<0.05 [statistically significant association]
Univariate logistic regression showing association of undernutrition and overnutrition with CEBQ sub-scales, n=142
| Scores | Undernutrition present [number, %] | OR | Overnutrition present [number, %] | OR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EF | Satisfactory | 23, 30.7 | 1 | 0.02 | 6, 8.0 | 1 | 0.009 |
| Unsatisfactory | 9, 13.4 | 0.35 | 16, 23.9 | 3.61 | |||
| EOE | Satisfactory | 12, 15.8 | 1 | 0.001 | 14, 18.4 | 1 | 0.42 |
| Unsatisfactory | 20, 30.3 | 2.32 | 8, 12.1 | 0.61 | |||
| SR | Satisfactory | 13, 19.1 | 1 | 0.08 | 17,25.0 | 1 | 0.003 |
| Unsatisfactory | 19, 25.7 | 1.47 | 5, 6.8 | 0.22 | |||
| SE | Satisfactory | 14, 19.7 | 1 | 0.18 | 14,19.7 | 1 | 0.16 |
| Unsatisfactory | 18, 25.4 | 1.38 | 8, 11.3 | 0.52 | |||
| DD | Satisfactory | 16, 23.9 | 1 | 0.87 | 10, 14.9 | 1 | 0.86 |
| Unsatisfactory | 16, 21.9 | 0.86 | 12, 16.0 | 1.09 | |||
| FF | Satisfactory | 10, 14.1 | 1 | 0.001 | 15, 21.1 | 1 | 0.07 |
| Unsatisfactory | 22, 31.0 | 2.74 | 7, 9.9 | 0.41 | |||
| EUE | Satisfactory | 19, 22.9 | 1 | 0.07 | 15, 18.1 | 1 | 0.31 |
| Unsatisfactory | 13, 22.0 | 0.95 | 7, 11.9 | 0.61 | |||
| FR | Satisfactory | 14, 20.3 | 1 | 0.09 | 12, 17.4 | 1 | 0.54 |
| Unsatisfactory | 18, 24.7 | 1.29 | 10, 13.7 | 0.75 |
*P<0.05 [statistically significant association]