Literature DB >> 32318415

Oral mucosal disorder-A demographic study.

Satish Kumar1, Ankit Suhag2, Anumeha Narwal3, Sumanta Kumar Kolay1, Arabinda Konidena4, Arti Saluja Sachdev5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Oral mucosal disorder (OMD) has the potential disorder than any other oral disorder. It is found in the all over would. In our country India, is also more prone area of oral mucosal disorder. People more affected in male, low educated, low socioeconomic. Areca nut consumption is more so oral mucosal disorder is more reported, this survey was undertaken in darbhanga and is surrounding to determine the demographic data of oral mucosal disorder and to identify their association with various factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 5620 patients of Oral mucosal disorder attending the dental outpatient clinic of the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology in dental college and department of dentistry in darbhanga medical college over a period of 36 months were selected for the study. A detailed case history and clinical examination was done in visible light. Study was done on the basis of age group, gender, socioeconomic habit duration, frequency of habit, and type of habit. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Simple t-test analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 5620 cases of OMD studied, 75.01% cases were male. 49.09% were low socioeconomic people, 36.12% graduate educated, 47.29% smokeless habit and frequency of habit more than two time 57.12%. Oral mucosal disorder.
CONCLUSION: Younger populations have relatively a higher percentage of oral mucosal lesions than would older populations. Habits, like smoking and smokeless, which further increase with age, can also increase the incidence of oral mucosal disorder Prevalence of habits was more in males than females. Copyright: © Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disorder; gender; socioeconomic

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318415      PMCID: PMC7114039          DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1034_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care        ISSN: 2249-4863


Introduction

Oral diseases are a major public health issue in our country. Maintaining good oral health means being free from pain in the oral and facial region, absence of oral sores and lesions, and being free from periodontal diseases, dental caries, tooth loss and many other diseases and disorders that affect oral cavity.[1] The consequences of widespread poor oral health can be seen on the personal, population, and health systems level, as caries and periodontal disease deteriorates the individual health and wellbeing, decrease economic productivity and act as significant risk factors for other systemic health ailments.[2] Oral mucosal disorder is found in all over India because poor oral hygiene, bad sanitation, low socio-economy status of population. Oral cancer is any malignant neoplasm which is found on the lip, floor of the mouth, cheek lining, gingiva, palate, or in the tongue. Oral cancer is among the top three types of cancers in India.[3] Pre-cancer lesion and condition is most common oral mucosal disorder in our century. The various part of our country tobacco prone area also North India is aricanut prone area. Malignant transformation rate of oral leukoplakia ranges from 0.13 to 17.5% and that of OSMF varies from 4.5%-7.6%.[456] Many studies have been done in various parts of India estimating the prevalence of oral premalignant lesions (OPML) and its risk factors. However, limited data is available regarding the same from this region. Hence this survey was undertaken in Darbhanga, and is surrounding to determine the demographic data of oral mucosal disorder and to identify their association with various factors. The objective of our study is evaluate of oral mucosal disorder in Darbhanga and its surrounding region.

Methods

A total of 21,500 patients visited the outpatient department of department of Oral Medicine and Radiology in Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital and Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital in Darbhanga during the period of September 2015 to September 2018. Examination was carried out in each individual than 5,620 individual have oral mucosal disorder. Patients selected for the study were explained in detail about the condition affecting their oral cavity. The diagnosis of the lesion was made based on history and clinical features, according to standard guidelines and color atlas.[7]

Result

Group I –Age

Prevalence of oral disorder is higher in age group 31-50 years than more in 50 years and less than 10-30 years [Table 1] percentage prevalence value is more 50.23% in age group 31-50 years, than 31.17% in above 50 years and 18.59% in 10-30 years, respectively [Figure 1]. These value is statically (simple t –test) Significant because recorded P value is less than 0.0001
Table 1

Data of age group

Age groupNumber of oral mucosal disorderPercentageMeanP
10-30 year104518.591873P<0.0001
31-50 year282350.23
Above -50 year175231.17
Total5620
Figure 1

Shows Percentage of Age Group

Data of age group Shows Percentage of Age Group

Group II-Sex

In sex group male Is higher prevalence [Table 2] similarly the percentage is more in male 74.0% than female 24.89% [Figure 2]. P value is less than 0.0001.
Table 2

Data of gender group

SexNumber of oral mucosal disorderPercentageMeanP
Male421675.012810P<0.0001
Female140424.98
Total5620
Figure 2

Show percentage of sex

Data of gender group Show percentage of sex

Group III-Socioeconomic Group

Prevalence of oral mucosal disorder in socioeconomic group less in higher class in comparison of middle class than lower classes. Percentage value of oral mucosal disorder in higher class is 19.80%, than middle class 31.10%, than lower class 49.09%, respectively [Table 3]. P –value of socioeconomic group is lesser than 0.0001. Figure 3 is also represent the percentage value of socioeconomic group of oral mucosal disorder
Table 3

Data of socioeconomic group

SocioeconomicNumber of oral mucosal disorder%MeanP
Lower class275949.091873P<0.0001
Middle class174831.10
Higher class111319.80
Total5620
Figure 3

Show percentage of Socioeconomic Group

Data of socioeconomic group Show percentage of Socioeconomic Group

Group IV-Basis of education

In the above Table 4, oral mucosal disorder on the basis of education is more in graduate people than school going student. The prevalence is lesser than post graduate in comparison of non-school going people. Percentage vale is more in graduate people then school going people then non-school than postgraduate people respectively shows in Figure 4. P value is lesser than 0.0001.
Table 4

Data of education group

EducationNumber of oral mucosal disorder%MeanP
Post graduate5479.731405P<0.0001
Graduate203036.12
School154327.45
Non school150026.69
Total5620
Figure 4

Show percentage of education

Data of education group Show percentage of education

Group V –Habit

The above [Table 5] shows prevalence value is more in smokeless habit (Gutka, beta quite, tobacco chewer) than smoker (Bidi, cigarette, ganja) than alcohol smokeless than alcohol smoking other habit. Percentage prevalence 23.55% in smokeless habit than smoking 23.55% than alcohol + smokeless 11.56% than alcohol = smoking 9.57% than other habit 8%, respectively, shows in Figure 5. P value is lesser than 0.0001.
Table 5

Data of habit group

Type of habitNumber of oral mucosal disorder%MeanP
Smoking (bidi, cigarette, gaja)132423.551124P<0.0001
Smokeless (gutkha, betel quite, tobacco)265847.29
Alcohol + Smoking5389.57
Alcohol + Smokeless65011.56
No any habit45008.00
Total5620
Figure 5

Show percentage of habit

Data of habit group Show percentage of habit

Group VI –Frequency of habit

Prevalence of oral mucosal disorder is more in those people habit more than two time than two time the one time respectively [Table 6]. Percentage value is more in two time 57.12% than two time 24.44% than one time 18.39%, respectively [Figure 6]. P value is less than 0.0001.
Table 6

Data of frequency of habit/day group

Habit frequency/dayNumber of oral mucosal disorder%MeanP
One time103418.391873P<0.0001
Two time137424.44
More than two time321257.12
Total5620
Figure 6

Show percentage of frequency of habit

Data of frequency of habit/day group Show percentage of frequency of habit

Discussion

In this study prevalence of oral mucosal disorder in age group is more in older population than younger. The overall prevalence of OMLs was found to be higher in older individuals than younger individuals, and it can be related to different habits acquired with age. Chewing, smoking, and consumption of alcoholic beverages have become a common social habit in these reason[89] The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions has been found to be higher in older patients than in the younger population.[91011] Patil et al.[12] showed males were more affected than females, and this difference was clinically not significant (P > 0.05). Mobeeriek et al.[13] the prevalence of oral lesions in females was higher than males, but in the Corbet et al. study in 1994.[14] Sami et al.[15] also notice male is more prevalence the female in our study also suggested male is more effected than female. In our study male are more prevalence than female. The percentage of male was 71.01% and of females was 24.98%. In our study, low socioeconomic people are more (49.09%) oral mucosal disorder due to poor oral hygiene. The higher socioeconomic people is very less (19.18%) oral mucosal disorder in compression of middle class (31.10%). Prevalence of oral mucosal disorder in post graduate people is lees (09.73%) in compression of graduate (36.12%) educated similarly school educated (27.45%) and uneducated people (26.69%) because higher educated people get more information of oral hygiene and oral mucosal disorder. similar study was done Saraswathi TR et al.,[16] KV.V. Parsad et al.[17] and Kamble KA et al.[18] Bhowate et al.,[19] Maher et al.[20] and Kamble KA et al.[18] their study reported prevalence of oral mucosal disorder is less in single habit individual in compression of multiple habit. In our study also shows multiple habit of individual are more oral lesion in compression of single habit. Smokeless is more (47.29%) oral disorder in compression of smoker (23.55%). Oral mucosal disorder is less (18.39%) in compression of more habit of frequency (57.12%) in this study. Primarily, this study is helpful for the proper diagnosis and good prognosis of oral mucosal disorder. This study also helps in figuring out the demographic of oral mucosal disorder in this region.

Conclusion

Our study was the first epidemiologic study in Darbhanga and it's surrounding about the prevalence of oral mucosal lesions and their relation to many factors. Younger populations have relatively a higher percentage of oral mucosal lesions than older populations would. Habits like smoking and smokeless, which further increase with age, can also increase the incidence of oral mucosal disorder Prevalence of habits was more in males than females. Programs to improve oral health should be conducted regularly to promote oral health care in the population.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  15 in total

1.  Trends of head and neck cancers in urban and rural India.

Authors:  J Kalavathy Elango; P Gangadharan; S Sumithra; M A Kuriakose
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

2.  Oral mucosal lesions in adult Chinese.

Authors:  H C Lin; E F Corbet; E C Lo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Prevalence of oral lesions in relation to habits: Cross-sectional study in South India.

Authors:  T R Saraswathi; K Ranganathan; S Shanmugam; Ramesh Sowmya; Prem Deepa Narasimhan; R Gunaseelan
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep

4.  Oral submucous fibrosis as a precancerous condition.

Authors:  J J Pindborg; P R Murti; R B Bhonsle; P C Gupta; D K Daftary; F S Mehta
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1984-06

5.  Diseases of the oral mucosa in the aged patient.

Authors:  I van der Waal
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  Oral premalignant lesions: from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Teruo Amagasa; Masashi Yamashiro; Narikazu Uzawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Role of areca nut in the causation of oral submucous fibrosis: a case-control study in Pakistan.

Authors:  R Maher; A J Lee; K A Warnakulasuriya; J A Lewis; N W Johnson
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.253

Review 8.  Addressing oral health disparities, inequity in access and workforce issues in a developing country.

Authors:  Abhinav Singh; Bharathi M Purohit
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.607

9.  Prevalence and Distribution of Oral Mucosal Lesions by Sex and Age Categories: A Retrospective Study of Patients Attending Lebanese School of Dentistry.

Authors:  Sami El Toum; Antoine Cassia; Nermine Bouchi; Issam Kassab
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-05-17

10.  Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in dental patients with tobacco smoking, chewing, and mixed habits: A cross-sectional study in South India.

Authors:  Prashant B Patil; Renuka Bathi; Smitha Chaudhari
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.