Literature DB >> 32318215

MEGA : Empirical Findings on the Preternatural: Sexually Violent and Predatory Sexually Violent Youth.

L C Miccio-Fonseca1.   

Abstract

Applied are empirical findings from two major studies employing the ecologically framed MEGA ♪ risk assessment tool: MEGA ♪ Combined Samples Studies (N = 3901 [1979-2017] (Miccio-Fonseca 2017a, d) and MEGA ♪ Combined Cross Validation Studies (N = 2717). Samples consisted of male, female, and transgender-female sexually abusive youth, ages 4-19, including youth with low intellectual functioning of borderline or low average. Findings further support a previously presented nomenclature identifying two subsets overlooked by most contemporary risk assessment tools: sexually violent and predatory sexually violent youth (Miccio-Fonseca and Rasmussen Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 18, 106-128, 2009, 2014). MEGA ♪ Studies provided normative data, with cut-off scores (calibrated) according to age and gender, establishing four risk levels: Low, Moderate, High, and Very High. The fourth risk level, Very High, sets MEGA ♪ apart from other risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth, which are limited to three risk levels. Very High risk level definitively identifies the most dangerous youth, thus empirically supporting the nomenclature of sexually violent and predatory sexually violent youth. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018.

Keywords:  Adolescent sex offender; MEGA risk assessment tool; Sexually abusive youth; Sexually violent predator; Violent sex offender

Year:  2018        PMID: 32318215      PMCID: PMC7163815          DOI: 10.1007/s40653-018-0242-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma        ISSN: 1936-1521


  23 in total

Review 1.  Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: what is next?

Authors:  Inge Hempel; Nicole Buck; Maaike Cima; Hjalmar van Marle
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2011-12-05

2.  Another piece of the puzzle: psychometric properties of the J-SOAP-II.

Authors:  Amanda M Fanniff; Elizabeth J Letourneau
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2012-02-17

3.  Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: the accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments.

Authors:  Natasha Elkovitch; Jodi L Viljoen; Mario J Scalora; Daniel Ullman
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2008

4.  Neuropsychological Risk Factors to Consider When Assessing for Sexually Abusive Youth.

Authors:  Trisha M Karsten; Rachyll Dempsey
Journal:  J Child Sex Abus       Date:  2018-11-14

5.  Development and Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II.

Authors:  Douglas L Epperson; Christopher A Ralston
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  Comparing Predictive Validity of JSORRAT-II and MEGA With Sexually Abusive Youth in Long-Term Residential Custody.

Authors:  Lucinda A Lee Rasmussen
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Correlates of recidivism among adolescents who have sexually offended.

Authors:  Julie Carpentier; Jean Proulx
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2011-09-29

8.  Differences in the prevalence and impact of risk factors for general recidivism between different types of juveniles who have committed sexual offenses (JSOs) and juveniles who have committed nonsexual offenses (NSOs).

Authors:  Claudia E van der Put; Eveline S van Vugt; Geert Jan J M Stams; Maja Deković; Peter H van der Laan
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2012-07-11

9.  Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheri Madigan; Anh Ly; Christina L Rash; Joris Van Ouytsel; Jeff R Temple
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

10.  Female Juvenile Sexual Offenders: Understanding Who They Are and Possible Steps That May Prevent Some Girls From Offending.

Authors:  Brian E Oliver; Laura Holmes
Journal:  J Child Sex Abus       Date:  2015
View more
  1 in total

1.  Contemporary Risk Assessment Tools: Should We Use Them for Sexually Abusive Children Ages 4 to 12 Years?

Authors:  L C Miccio-Fonseca
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2019-06-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.