Karen L Koenig1, Stephanie Scarmo1, Yelena Afanasyeva1, Tess V Clendenen1, Per Magne Ueland2, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte3,4. 1. Departments of Population Health and Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 650 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA. 2. Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen and Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway. 3. Departments of Population Health and Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 650 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA. anne.jacquotte@nyumc.org. 4. Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, 530 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA. anne.jacquotte@nyumc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Folates found in natural foods are thought to protect against cancer. However, folic acid (FA), a synthetic form of folate used in supplements and fortified foods, may increase breast cancer risk if present in unmetabolized form (UMFA) in the circulation. This study examined the associations of serum UMFA and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-mTHF), the predominant form of circulating folate, with breast cancer risk. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in a prospective cohort. In total, 553 cases of invasive breast cancer, diagnosed before mandatory FA fortification of grain in the US in 1998, were individually-matched to 1059 controls. Serum UMFA and 5-mTHF were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in stored serum samples, and 5-mTHF was corrected for storage degradation. RESULTS: Serum UMFA was not associated with breast cancer risk: the percentage of women with detectable levels of UMFA was similar in cases and controls (18% and 20%, respectively; p = 0.46). Two tag-SNPs in the promoter region of the FA-metabolizing gene were also not associated with risk. There was a marginally significant inverse association of 5-mTHFcorrected with breast cancer risk (odds ratio for the highest vs. lowest quintile = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.97; ptrend = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Circulating UMFA was not associated with breast cancer risk. These results apply to countries without mandatory FA food fortification. Studies are needed in countries with mandatory fortification, where levels of UMFA are much higher than in our study.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES:Folates found in natural foods are thought to protect against cancer. However, folic acid (FA), a synthetic form of folate used in supplements and fortified foods, may increase breast cancer risk if present in unmetabolized form (UMFA) in the circulation. This study examined the associations of serum UMFA and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-mTHF), the predominant form of circulating folate, with breast cancer risk. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in a prospective cohort. In total, 553 cases of invasive breast cancer, diagnosed before mandatory FA fortification of grain in the US in 1998, were individually-matched to 1059 controls. Serum UMFA and 5-mTHF were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in stored serum samples, and 5-mTHF was corrected for storage degradation. RESULTS: Serum UMFA was not associated with breast cancer risk: the percentage of women with detectable levels of UMFA was similar in cases and controls (18% and 20%, respectively; p = 0.46). Two tag-SNPs in the promoter region of the FA-metabolizing gene were also not associated with risk. There was a marginally significant inverse association of 5-mTHFcorrected with breast cancer risk (odds ratio for the highest vs. lowest quintile = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.97; ptrend = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Circulating UMFA was not associated with breast cancer risk. These results apply to countries without mandatory FA food fortification. Studies are needed in countries with mandatory fortification, where levels of UMFA are much higher than in our study.
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; Maya R Sternberg; Zia Fazili; Elizabeth A Yetley; David A Lacher; Regan L Bailey; Clifford L Johnson Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; Maya R Sternberg; Zia Fazili; David A Lacher; Mindy Zhang; Clifford L Johnson; Heather C Hamner; Regan L Bailey; Jeanne I Rader; Sedigheh Yamini; R J Berry; Elizabeth A Yetley Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Rita Hannisdal; Randi E Gislefoss; Tom K Grimsrud; Steinar Hustad; Lars Mørkrid; Per Magne Ueland Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Lynn B Bailey; Patrick J Stover; Helene McNulty; Michael F Fenech; Jesse F Gregory; James L Mills; Christine M Pfeiffer; Zia Fazili; Mindy Zhang; Per M Ueland; Anne M Molloy; Marie A Caudill; Barry Shane; Robert J Berry; Regan L Bailey; Dorothy B Hausman; Ramkripa Raghavan; Daniel J Raiten Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Tess Clendenen; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Isaac Wirgin; Karen L Koenig; Yelena Afanasyeva; Eva Lundin; Alan A Arslan; Tomas Axelsson; Asta Försti; Göran Hallmans; Kari Hemminki; Per Lenner; Nirmal Roy; Roy E Shore; Yu Chen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240