| Literature DB >> 32317667 |
Yiting Wang1,2, Chunjian Shan1,2,3, Yingying Zhang2, Lei Ding2, Juan Wen4, Yingying Tian5,6.
Abstract
Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is affected by multiple risk factors. Therefore, it is difficult for clinical professionals to identify women who will not practice EBF well and provide subsequent medical suggestions and treatments. This study aimed to apply a decision tree (DT) model to predict EBF at two months postpartum. The socio-demographic, clinical and breastfeeding parameters of 1,141 breastfeeding women from Nanjing were evaluated. Decision tree modelling was used to analyse and screen EBF factors and establish a risk assessment model of EBF. The Chinese version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (CV-BSES) score, early formula supplementation, abnormal nipples, mastitis, neonatal jaundice, cracked or sore nipples and intended duration of breastfeeding were significant risk factors associated with EBF in the DT model. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the DT model were 73.1%, 75.5% and 66.3%, respectively. The DT model showed similar or better performance than the logistic regression model in assessing the risk of early cessation of EBF before two months postpartum. The DT model has potential for application in clinical practice and identifies high-risk subpopulations that need specific prevention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32317667 PMCID: PMC7174406 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63073-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow diagram for the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Socio-demographic, clinical and breastfeeding characteristics of the participants.
| Variable | Exclusive breastfeeding | OR | 95% CI | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, N = 916, (%) | No, N = 495, (%) | ||||
| Age, years | 29.48 ± 3.41 | 29.51 ± 3.53 | 1.002 | 0.971–1.034 | 0.901 |
| Gestation, weeks | 39.66 ± 1.08 | 39.73 ± 1.06 | 1.060 | 0.957–1.175 | 0.265 |
| Prenatal BMI, Kg/m2 | 25.97 ± 3.11 | 26.07 ± 3.08 | 1.010 | 0.975–1.046 | 0.593 |
| Parity | |||||
| Primiparous | 703 (76.7) | 407 (82.2) | 0.714 | 0.541–0.941 | 0.017 |
| Multiparous | 213 (23.3) | 88 (17.8) | |||
| Delivery mode | |||||
| Vaginal delivery | 596 (65.1) | 303 (61.2) | 1.117 | 0.933–1.467 | 0.173 |
| Caesarean delivery | 320 (34.9) | 192 (38.8) | |||
| Maternal education | |||||
| High school or below | 78 (8.5) | 35 (7.1) | 1.163 | 0.936–1.444 | 0.172 |
| College graduate orbachelor degree | 675 (73.7) | 360 (72.7) | |||
| Graduate or above | 163 (17.8) | 100 (20.2) | |||
| Work full-time during the pregnancy | |||||
| Yes | 802 (87.6) | 450 (90.9) | 0.704 | 0.489–1.012 | 0.058 |
| No | 114 (12.4) | 45 (9.1) | |||
| Household income, RMB/year | |||||
| <¥50,000 | 52 (5.7) | 32 (6.5) | 0.947 | 0.829–1.082 | 0.423 |
| ¥50,000–100,000 | 278 (30.3) | 153 (30.9) | |||
| ¥100,000–200,000 | 411 (44.9) | 223 (45.0) | |||
| >¥200,000 | 175 (19.1) | 87 (17.6) | |||
| Living with parents | |||||
| Yes | 697 (76.1) | 361 (72.9) | 1.181 | 0.920–1.516 | 0.191 |
| No | 361 (23.9) | 134 (26.1) | |||
| Drinking or smoking during pregnancy | |||||
| Yes | 9 (0.98) | 6 (1.21) | 0.809 | 0.286–2.285 | 0.689 |
| No | 907 (99.02) | 489 (98.79) | |||
| Maternity leave time | |||||
| <4 months | 207 (22.6) | 115 (23.2) | 0.902 | 0.807–1.049 | 0.211 |
| 4~6 months | 558 (60.9) | 310 (62.6) | |||
| > 6 months | 41 (4.5) | 25 (5.1) | |||
| Without work | 110 (12.0) | 45 (9.1) | |||
| Intended duration of breastfeeding | |||||
| <6 months | 85 (9.3) | 78 (15.8) | 0.927 | 0.867–0991 | 0.026 |
| 6~12 months | 376 (41.0) | 194 (39.2) | |||
| >12 months | 455 (49.7) | 223 (45.0) | |||
| Prenatal education attendance | |||||
| None | 182 (19.9) | 124 (25.1) | 0.891 | 0.794–1.000 | 0.049 |
| Few | 372 (40.6) | 193 (39.0) | |||
| Almost all | 231 (25.2) | 116 (23.4) | |||
| All | 131 (14.3) | 62 (12.5) | |||
| Neonatal birth weight, g | 3449.80 ± 379.82 | 3442.76 ± 373.27 | 1.000 | 1.000–1.000 | 0.738 |
| CV-BSES scores | 118.54 ± 19.44 | 100.27 ± 24.08 | 0.962 | 0.956–0.968 | 0.000 |
| Early skin-to-skin contact and suckling | |||||
| Within an hour after birth | 805 (87.8) | 402 (81.2) | 1.678 | 1.242–2.266 | 0.001 |
| An hour after birth | 111 (12.2) | 93 (18.8) | |||
| Using a pacifier | |||||
| Yes | 24 (2.6) | 19 (3.8) | 0.674 | 0.365–1.243 | 0.207 |
| No | 892 (97.4) | 476 (96.2) | |||
| Perception of breast milk supply | |||||
| Oversupply | 111 (12.1) | 107 (21.6) | 0.584 | 0.462–0.737 | 0.000 |
| Normal | 723 (78.9) | 357 (72.1) | |||
| Low supply | 82 (9.0) | 31 (6.3) | |||
| Early formula supplementation | |||||
| Yes | 278 (30.3) | 248 (50.1) | 2.304 | 1.839–2.887 | 0.000 |
| No | 638 (69.7) | 247 (49.9) | |||
| Abnormal nipples | |||||
| Yes | 57 (6.2) | 98 (19.8) | 3.720 | 2.628–5.266 | 0.000 |
| No | 859 (93.8) | 397 (80.2) | |||
| Cracked or sore nipples | |||||
| Yes | 123 (13.4) | 93 (18.8) | 1.492 | 1.111–2.003 | 0.008 |
| No | 793 (86.6) | 402 (81.2) | |||
| Mastitis | |||||
| Yes | 140 (15.3) | 123 (24.8) | 0.546 | 0.416–0.716 | 0.000 |
| No | 776 (84.7) | 372 (65.2) | |||
| Neonatal jaundice | |||||
| Yes | 183 (20.0) | 151 (30.5) | 0.569 | 0.443–0.731 | 0.000 |
| No | 733 (80.0) | 344 (69.5) | |||
Figure 2Decision tree predicting the risk for the early cessation of EBF at 2 months postpartum.
Comparison of the performance parameters of the logistic regression and decision tree models.
| Decision Tree Model | Logistic Regression Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted positives | Predicted negatives | Predicted positives | Predicted negatives | |
| Diagnosed positives | 796 (TP) | 120 (FN) | 809 (TP) | 107 (FN) |
| Diagnosed negatives | 259 (FP) | 236 (TN) | 276 (FP) | 219 (FN) |
| Accuracy | 0.731 | 0.729 | ||
| Sensitivity | 0.755 | 0.746 | ||
| Specificity | 0.663 | 0.672 | ||
TP true positive, TN true negative, FP false positive, FN false negative a Accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + FP + TN + FN) b Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) c Specificity = TN/(TN + FP).
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the decision tree and logistic regression models.