Literature DB >> 3231740

Assessment of the reliability of physical measures.

J L Engstrom1.   

Abstract

Assessment of the reliability of physical measures that yield continuous data (e.g., physiological measures such as blood pressure and anthropometric measures such as weight) should include the following statistics and procedures: mean, minimal and maximal differences; standard deviation of the net differences; technical error of measurement; and clinically meaningful indices of agreement. Displaying differences graphically and using Exploratory Data Analysis are excellent methods of summarizing differences. In those situations where any measurement error is important, regardless of its direction, the absolute value of the differences should be used to describe average differences. Correlation coefficients are not recommended because they are not adequate tests of reliability.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3231740     DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770110606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  7 in total

1.  Test weighing for term and premature infants is an accurate procedure.

Authors:  Paula P Meier; Janet L Engstrom
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Accuracy of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and BMI Over Time in Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Leah M Lipsky; Denise L Haynie; Christine Hill; Tonja R Nansel; Kaigang Li; Danping Liu; Ronald J Iannotti; Bruce Simons-Morton
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study.

Authors:  Guri Skeie; Nicolle Mode; Maria Henningsen; Kristin Benjaminsen Borch
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Assessing the accuracy of two proxy measures for BMI in a semi-rural, low-resource setting in Guatemala.

Authors:  Jonathan N Maupin; Daniel J Hruschka
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  The reliability of weight-for-length/height Z scores in children.

Authors:  Martha K Mwangome; James A Berkley
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Validity of silhouette showcards as a measure of body size and obesity in a population in the African region: A practical research tool for general-purpose surveys.

Authors:  Maryam Yepes; Barathi Viswanathan; Pascal Bovet; Jürgen Maurer
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2015-12-17

7.  Reliability of routinely collected anthropometric measurements in primary care.

Authors:  Sarah Carsley; Patricia C Parkin; Karen Tu; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Nav Persaud; Jonathon L Maguire; Catherine S Birken
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.