| Literature DB >> 32317090 |
Pan Wang1, Honglin Zhao1, Ruifeng Shi1, Xingyu Liu1, Jinghao Liu1, Fan Ren1, Qingchun Zhao1, Hongbing Zhang1, Yongwen Li2, Hongyu Liu2, Jun Chen1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality of lung cancer often rank first in all malignant tumors. DNA methylation, as one of epigenetics, often participates in the development and progression of tumors. CDO1 as a tumor suppressor gene always undergoes methylation changes early in tumor development. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the value of CDO1 methylation in the early diagnosis of lung cancer.Entities:
Keywords: CDO1; DNA; Lung neoplasms; Methylation; Plasma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32317090 PMCID: PMC7260387 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2020.102.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi ISSN: 1009-3419
351例人群的基本临床信息
Clinical characteristics of all the subjects
| Category | |
| AD: adenocarcinoma; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; SCLC: small cell lung cancer; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis. | |
| All the subjects ( | |
| Gender | |
| Male | 191 (54.4) |
| Female | 160 (45.6) |
| Age (yr) | |
| > 60 | 152 (43.3) |
| ≤60 | 199 (56.7) |
| Types of diseases | |
| Malignant tumor | 178 (50.7) |
| Benign lung disease | 69 (19.7) |
| Health control | 104 (29.6) |
| Smoking history | |
| Ever | 126 (35.9) |
| Never | 225 (64.1) |
| Malignant tumor ( | |
| Metastasis | |
| None | 86 (48.3) |
| Yes | 92 (51.7) |
| TNM stage | |
| Ⅰ | 71 (39.9) |
| Ⅱ | 17 (9.6) |
| Ⅲ | 46 (25.8) |
| Ⅳ | 44 (24.7) |
| Histology | |
| AD | 112 (62.9) |
| SCC | 29 (16.3) |
| SCLC | 14 (7.9) |
| Others | 23 (12.9) |
CDO1甲基化水平与临床病理特征的关系
The relationship between CDO1 methylation level and clinicopathological characteristics
| Factor | CDO1 relative expression (25%, 75%) | |
| a: Because the number of the patients with other pathological types was fewer, the related test was not done. | ||
| All the subjects ( | ||
| Gender | 0.35 | |
| Male | 0.028 (0.013, 0.440) | |
| Female | 0.032 (0.017, 0.300) | |
| Age (yr) | 0.004 | |
| > 60 | 0.120 (0.014, 1.630) | |
| ≤60 | 0.029 (0.015, 0.083) | |
| Types of diseases | < 0.001 | |
| Malignant tumor | 0.092 (0.016, 1.830) | |
| Benign lung disease | 0.018 (0.011, 0.058) | |
| Health control | 0.028 (0.017, 0.050) | |
| Smoking history | 0.733 | |
| Ever | 0.029 (0.013, 1.506) | |
| Never | 0.030 (0.016, 0.230) | |
| Malignant tumor ( | ||
| Metastasis | < 0.001 | |
| None | 0.028 (0.013, 0.230) | |
| Yes | 0.680 (0.027, 7.610) | |
| TNM stage | < 0.001 | |
| Ⅰ | 0.0280 (0.013, 0.230) | |
| Ⅱ | 0.037 (0.016, 2.910) | |
| Ⅲ | 0.054 (0.014, 2.760) | |
| Ⅳ | 2.350 (0.150, 12.840) | |
| Histologya | 0.08 | |
| AD | 0.058 (0.014, 0.77) | |
| SCC | 0.160 (0.018, 6.210) | |
| SCLC | 2.100 (0.012, 24.940) | |
1CDO1基因在不同分组中的甲基化水平的比较。肺癌组vs肺部良性疾病组, P < 0.001;肺癌组vs健康对照组, P < 0.05;肺部良性疾病组vs健康对照组, P > 0.05。
Comparison of methylation levels of CDO1 gene in different groups. Lung cancer group vs Benign lung disease group, P < 0.001; Lung cancer group vs Health control group, P < 0.05; Benign lung disease group vs Health control group, P > 0.05.
单个和多个基因联合诊断效能的分析
The diagnostic efficacy of single and multiple genes combined
| Diagnosis index | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | AUC |
| a: Combined diagnosis of CEA, CYFR211, SCC, ProGRP and NSE; b: Combined diagnosis of CDO1, CEA, CYFR211, SCC, ProGRP and NSE. CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; CYFR21-1: cytokeratin 19 fragment; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma antigen; ProGRP: pro-gastrin releasing peptide; NSE: neuron specific endolase; AUC: area under the curve; COD1: cysteine dioxygenase 1. | ||||
| CDO1 | 52.2 | 78.6 | 65.2 | 0.635 |
| CEA | 29.0 | 95.0 | 46.0 | 0.623 |
| CYFR211 | 37.7 | 96.9 | 53.2 | 0.674 |
| SCC | 17.1 | 93.5 | 37.1 | 0.551 |
| ProGRP | 13.7 | 100.0 | 36.3 | 0.569 |
| NSE | 37.0 | 81.0 | 48.7 | 0.587 |
| Five combined checka | 69.1 | 69.4 | 69.2 | 0.691 |
| Six combined checkb | 79.2 | 70.5 | 74.9 | 0.749 |
不同临床分期中基因诊断准确度的比较
Comparison of the accuracy of gene diagnosis in different clinical stages
| Diagnosis index | Ⅰ ( | Ⅱ ( | Ⅲ ( | Ⅳ ( |
| a: Combined diagnosis of CEA, CYFR211, SCC, ProGRP and NSE; b: Combined diagnosis of CDO1, CEA, CYFR211, SCC, ProGRP and NSE. | ||||
| CDO1 | 40.8% | 47.1% | 43.5% | 81.8% |
| CEA | 17.1% | 18.8% | 34.8% | 45.5% |
| CYFR211 | 14.5% | 25.0% | 52.2% | 63.3% |
| SCC | 4.3% | 31.3% | 21.7% | 27.3% |
| ProGRP | 2.9% | 25.0% | 21.7% | 18.2% |
| NSE | 15.9% | 40.0% | 46.7% | 59.1% |
| Five combined checka | 44.9% | 68.8% | 87.0% | 88.6% |
| Six combined checkb | 62.0% | 82.4% | 87.0% | 97.7% |