| Literature DB >> 32316131 |
Muhammad Bilal1,2, Wen Xu1,3, Chao Wang1,2, Hua Wen1,2, Xinnian Zhao1,2, Dan Song1,2, Lan Ding3.
Abstract
Monolayer (ML) hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) is an important material in making, e.g., deep ultraviolet optoelectronic and power devices and van der Waals heterojunctions in combination with other two-dimensional (2D) electronic systems such as graphene and ML MoS 2 . In this work, we present a comparative study of the basic optoelectronic properties of low resistance ML hBN placed on different substrates such as SiO 2 /Si, quartz, PET, and sapphire. The measurement is carried out by using terahertz (THz) time-domain spectroscopy (TDS) in a temperature regime from 80 to 280 K. We find that the real and imaginary parts of the optical conductivity obtained experimentally for low resistance ML hBN on different substrates can fit well to the Drude-Smith formula. Thus, we are able to determine optically the key sample and material parameters (e.g., the electronic relaxation time or mobility, the carrier density, the electronic localization factor, etc.) of ML hBN. The effect of temperature on these parameters is also examined and analyzed. The results obtained from this study enable us to suggest the appropriate substrate for ML hBN based electronic and optoelectronic devices. This work is relevant to the application to a newly developed 2D electronic system as advanced electronic and optoelectronic materials.Entities:
Keywords: chemical vapor deposition; hexagonal boron nitride; monolayer; terahertz; time domain spectroscopy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32316131 PMCID: PMC7221761 DOI: 10.3390/nano10040762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1The THz electric field strength transmitted through ML hBN on the quartz substrate (red curve) and through the bare quartz substrate (black curve), respectively, as a function of delay time at T = 280 K. The inset shows the corresponding amplitudes and phase angles of the THz electric field strengths transmitted through the ML hBN sample and the substrate in the frequency domain. The results for the phase angles coincide roughly.
Figure 2(a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the optical conductivity as a function of radiation frequency at different temperatures for ML hBN on different substrates as indicated. Here, S.
Figure 3The experimental and fitted (through Drude–Smith formula) real and imaginary parts of optical conductivity as a function of radiation frequency for ML hBN on PET, sapphire, quartz, and SiO/Si substrates at 280 K, respectively. Here, the solid curves are obtained from the Drude–Smith formula, and the dots are experimental data. .
Figure 4(a) Electronic relaxation time, (b) hole density, and (c) electronic localization factor for ML hBN placed on sapphire, quartz, PET, and SiO/Si substrates as a function of temperature from 80 K to 280 K.