Literature DB >> 32316080

Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Assessment of Long-Term Safety in a Phase 3, Open-Label Study (SUSTAIN-2).

Wayne C Drevets1, Jaskaran B Singh1, Ewa Wajs2,3, Leah Aluisio1, Richard Holder4, Ella J Daly5, Rosanne Lane5, Pilar Lim6, Joyce E George6, Randall L Morrison6, Gerard Sanacora7, Allan H Young8,9, Siegfried Kasper10, Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman11, Cheng-Ta Li12, Jong-Woo Paik13, Husseini Manji5, David Hough6, Jennifer Grunfeld14, Hong Jin Jeon15, Samuel T Wilkinson7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray plus a new oral antidepressant (OAD) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term (up to 1 year) study was conducted between October 2015 and October 2017. Patients (≥ 18 years) with TRD (DSM-5 diagnosis of major depressive disorder and nonresponse to ≥ 2 OAD treatments) were enrolled directly or transferred from a short-term study (patients aged ≥ 65 years). Esketamine nasal spray (28-mg, 56-mg, or 84-mg) plus new OAD was administered twice a week in a 4-week induction (IND) phase and weekly or every-other-week for patients who were responders and entered a 48-week optimization/maintenance (OP/MAINT) phase.
RESULTS: Of 802 enrolled patients, 86.2% were direct-entry and 13.8% were transferred-entry; 580 (74.5%) of 779 patients who entered the IND phase completed the phase, and 150 (24.9%) of 603 who entered the OP/MAINT phase completed the phase. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dizziness (32.9%), dissociation (27.6%), nausea (25.1%), and headache (24.9%). Seventy-six patients (9.5%) discontinued esketamine due to TEAEs. Fifty-five patients (6.9%) experienced serious TEAEs. Most TEAEs occurred on dosing days, were mild or moderate in severity, and resolved on the same day. Two deaths were reported; neither was considered related to esketamine. Cognitive performance generally either improved or remained stable postbaseline. There was no case of interstitial cystitis or respiratory depression. Treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms were transient and generally resolved within 1.5 hours postdose. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score decreased during the IND phase, and this reduction persisted during the OP/MAINT phase (mean [SD] change from baseline of respective phase to endpoint: IND, -16.4 [8.76]; OP/MAINT, 0.3 [8.12]).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term esketamine nasal spray plus new OAD therapy had a manageable safety profile, and improvements in depression appeared to be sustained in patients with TRD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02497287. © Copyright 2020 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32316080     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.19m12891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  35 in total

Review 1.  [Practical aspects of ketamine treatment-Safety, combination treatment and comorbidities].

Authors:  H Findeis; V Ludwig; P Mikolas; J Graff; M Bauer; Philipp Ritter
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Evaluating the Role of Ketamine/Esketamine in the Management of Major Depressive Disorder with Suicide Risk.

Authors:  Sina Nikayin; Gerard Sanacora
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  The Ketamine Side Effect Tool (KSET): A comprehensive measurement-based safety tool for ketamine treatment in psychiatry.

Authors:  Adam Bayes; Brooke Short; Carlos A Zarate; Lawrence Park; James W Murrough; Declan M McLoughlin; Patricio Riva-Posse; Robert Schoevers; Jolien Veraart; Sagar Parikh; Paul Glue; Johnson Fam; Rupert McShane; Veronica Galvez; Donel Martin; Phern-Chern Tor; Andre R Brunoni; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 6.533

Review 4.  Key considerations for the use of ketamine and esketamine for the treatment of depression: focusing on administration, safety, and tolerability.

Authors:  Michael D Kritzer; Chi-Un Pae; Prakash S Masand
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.011

5.  Genome-wide association study and polygenic risk score analysis of esketamine treatment response.

Authors:  Qingqin S Li; Ewa Wajs; Rachel Ochs-Ross; Jaskaran Singh; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Managing Esketamine Treatment Frequency Toward Successful Outcomes: Analysis of Phase 3 Data.

Authors:  Michel Nijs; Ewa Wajs; Leah Aluisio; Ibrahim Turkoz; Ella Daly; Adam Janik; Stephane Borentain; Jaskaran B Singh; Allitia DiBernardo; Frank Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.176

7.  Comment to Drs Gastaldon, Papola, Ostuzzi and Barbui.

Authors:  Maju Mathews; Ella J Daly; Vanina Popova; Kristin Heerlein; Carla Canuso; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.892

8.  Fluoroethylnormemantine, A Novel Derivative of Memantine, Facilitates Extinction Learning Without Sensorimotor Deficits.

Authors:  Briana K Chen; Gwenaëlle Le Pen; Adam Eckmier; Gilles Rubinstenn; Therese M Jay; Christine A Denny
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.176

9.  Ketamine: A tale of two enantiomers.

Authors:  Luke A Jelen; Allan H Young; James M Stone
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 10.  Intranasal Ketamine for Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Dongjiao An; Changwei Wei; Jing Wang; Anshi Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.