Vagner Antonio Rodrigues Silva1, Alexandre Caixeta Guimarães2, Joel Lavinsky3, Henrique Furlan Pauna4, Arthur Menino Castilho2, Agrício Nubiato Crespo2. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil, vagrodrigues@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil. 3. Postgraduate Program in Surgical Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Noise-induced hearing loss is the most preventable cause of auditory impairment. Periodic audiometric evaluations are essential to monitor the hearing health of noise-exposed workers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the evolution of audiometric thresholds in the initial three evaluations at frequencies of 3, 4, and 6 kHz in groups of workers exposed or not to noise. METHODS: In this historical cohort study, audiometric evaluations were obtained from male workers between 18 and 40 years of age at six different metallurgical companies in Brazil. The workers were separated into noise-exposed and non-noise-exposed groups. The mean thresholds for 3, 4, and 6 kHz were calculated for both ears at baseline and the first and second periodic evaluations. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,382 metallurgical workers were evaluated (1,199 noise-exposed and 183 non-noise-exposed). There was a significant difference between baseline and the first periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.62; p = 0.0030 and left ear - effect size = 0.74; p = 0.0063) and between baseline and the second periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.85; p = 0.004 and left ear - effect size = 0.96; p = 0.0002). In the non-noise-exposed group, there was no difference between baseline and the first periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.18; p = 0.2703 and left ear - effect size = 0.12; p = 0.7907) and between baseline and the second periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.29; p = 0.4475 and left ear - effect size = 0.41; p = 0.6381). CONCLUSION: In noise-exposed workers, there was a significant worsening of audiometric thresholds between baseline and the initial periodic evaluation, but there was no difference between the two post-baseline evaluations. This shows that noise exposure can quickly affect hearing, despite protective measures.
INTRODUCTION: Noise-induced hearing loss is the most preventable cause of auditory impairment. Periodic audiometric evaluations are essential to monitor the hearing health of noise-exposed workers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the evolution of audiometric thresholds in the initial three evaluations at frequencies of 3, 4, and 6 kHz in groups of workers exposed or not to noise. METHODS: In this historical cohort study, audiometric evaluations were obtained from male workers between 18 and 40 years of age at six different metallurgical companies in Brazil. The workers were separated into noise-exposed and non-noise-exposed groups. The mean thresholds for 3, 4, and 6 kHz were calculated for both ears at baseline and the first and second periodic evaluations. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,382 metallurgical workers were evaluated (1,199 noise-exposed and 183 non-noise-exposed). There was a significant difference between baseline and the first periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.62; p = 0.0030 and left ear - effect size = 0.74; p = 0.0063) and between baseline and the second periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.85; p = 0.004 and left ear - effect size = 0.96; p = 0.0002). In the non-noise-exposed group, there was no difference between baseline and the first periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.18; p = 0.2703 and left ear - effect size = 0.12; p = 0.7907) and between baseline and the second periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.29; p = 0.4475 and left ear - effect size = 0.41; p = 0.6381). CONCLUSION: In noise-exposed workers, there was a significant worsening of audiometric thresholds between baseline and the initial periodic evaluation, but there was no difference between the two post-baseline evaluations. This shows that noise exposure can quickly affect hearing, despite protective measures.