| Literature DB >> 32313787 |
Yaojiang Li1, Junying Wu1, Lijun Yang1, Deshen Geng1, Manzoor Sultan1, Lang Chen1.
Abstract
4-amino-3-aminopyrazole-8-trinitropyrazolo-[5, 1-c] [1, 2, 4]triazine (Entities:
Keywords: detonation performance; molecular dynamics; polymerization reactios; reaction kinetics; thermal decomposition
Year: 2020 PMID: 32313787 PMCID: PMC7155779 DOI: 10.1002/open.202000006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Figure 1Schematic diagram of PTX molecular structure.
Figure 2PTX molecular configuration before and after relaxation.
The cellular parameters of PTX crystals at room temperature.
|
PTX |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reference |
5.26 |
8.59 |
20.39 |
1.95 |
|
ReaxFF/lg |
5.23 |
8.53 |
20.25 |
1.99 |
|
Error/(%) |
0.57 |
0.70 |
0.69 |
2.05 |
|
Parameter |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
921.99 |
|
ReaxFF/lg |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
902.74 |
|
Error/(%) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.06 |
Figure 3Evolution of potential energy for PTX of different densities at 3000 K.
Unimolecular reactions of PTX of different densities at 3000 K.
|
|
|
Frequency |
Reaction time/ps |
Primary reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3000 |
1.979 |
7 |
0∼0.55 |
C5H2N8O6→NO2+C5H2N7O4 |
|
5 |
1.25∼6.20 |
C5H2N8O6→NO+C5H2N7O5 | ||
|
1 |
0.15∼0.15 |
C5H2N8O6→H+C5HN8O6 | ||
|
1 |
0.55∼0.55 |
C5H2N8O6→N2+C5HN6O6 | ||
|
1 |
0.20∼0.20 |
C5H2N8O6→H2N+C5N7O6 | ||
|
2.400 |
2 |
0.10∼1.25 |
C5H2N8O6→NO+C5H2N7O5 | |
|
1 |
0.05∼0.05 |
C5H2N8O6→NO2+C5H2N7O4 | ||
|
1 |
0.65∼0.65 |
C5H2N8O6→N2+C5HN6O6 | ||
|
2.668 |
1 |
0∼0 |
C5H2N8O6→NO2+C5H2N7O4 | |
|
1 |
0.10∼0.10 |
C5H2N8O6→H2N+C5N7O6 | ||
|
2.823 |
1 |
0.85∼0.85 |
C5H2N8O6→NO2+C5H2N7O4 |
Figure 4Energy barriers of path 1, 2 and 3.
Figure 5Polymerization of PTX.
Figure 6Evolution of total species for PTX supercell at 3000 K.
Figure 7Relative bond change of C−O at 3000 K.
Figure 8Relative bond change of H−N at 3000 K.
Figure 9Evolution of NO, NO2, HNO, and HNO2 at 3000 K.
Figure 10Evolution of CO2, H2O, N2, H2 at 3000 K.
Figure 11Evolution of γ with different densities at 3000 K.
Figure 12Evolution of Number of clusters with different densities at 3000 K.
Arrhenius parameters fitted to PTX exponential decay rates, k(ps−1), over the Entire Simulation Period for various initial densities.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.979 g ⋅ cm−3 |
2.400 g ⋅ cm−3 |
2.668 g ⋅ cm−3 |
2.823 g ⋅ cm−3 | |
|
2000 K |
0.16 |
0.19 |
1.13 |
3.24 |
|
2500 K |
0.69 |
1.42 |
3.01 |
12.13 |
|
3000 K |
1.60 |
2.86 |
5.81 |
19.52 |
|
3500 K |
3.17 |
11.88 |
15.18 |
22.81 |
Figure 13Logarithm of initial reaction rates vs inverse temperature from 2000–3500 K.
Activation energy of PTX at different densities and for different explosives in the endothermic stage.
|
Explosives |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
PTX |
1.979 |
115.0 |
|
2.400 |
153.1 | |
|
2.668 |
96.91 | |
|
2.823 |
77.32 | |
|
|
1.770 |
104.9 |
|
TNT |
1.510 |
143.4 |
Arrhenius parameters fitted to PE exponential decay rate, k(ps−1), for various initial densities.
|
T/K |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.979 g ⋅ cm−3 |
2.400 g ⋅ cm−3 |
2.668 g ⋅ cm−3 |
2.823 g ⋅ cm−3 | |
|
3000 K |
0.07 |
0.10 |
0.12 |
0.14 |
|
3500 K |
0.15 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.25 |
|
4000 K |
0.25 |
0.31 |
0.39 |
0.45 |
|
4500 K |
0.28 |
0.34 |
0.43 |
0.50 |
Figure 14Logarithm of second reaction rates vs inverse temperature from 3000–4200 K.
Activation energy of PTX at different densities and for different explosives in the exothermic stage.
|
Explosives |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
PTX |
1.979 |
117.5 |
|
2.400 |
109.4 | |
|
2.668 |
117.7 | |
|
2.823 |
113.3 | |
|
|
1.770 |
94.47 |
|
TNT |
1.510 |
157.6 |
Figure 15Reaction rate k of CO2, N2 with different densities at 3000 K.