Literature DB >> 32313597

Reaching a Large Urban Undergraduate Population through Microbial Ecology Course-Based Research Experiences.

Samantha Parks1, Jessica Lee Joyner1, Matthew Nusnbaum1.   

Abstract

Traditional postsecondary education is making progress on embracing the diversity of student backgrounds and experiences while preparing them for the demands of STEM careers. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are effective tools to concurrently achieve many student and faculty goals: facilitating training of students, building career competencies, generating publishable research results and enabling research experiences where students apply their knowledge and interest. Georgia State University is not unique with a high student demand for research experiences and mentors that is greater than traditional research faculty labs can accommodate. Georgia State University is, however, unique in that it is a demographically diverse campus which serves minority and non-traditional students (i.e., second career and veterans) and is also rapidly growing. Therefore, to enhance the microbiology curriculum and facilitate authentic research experiences for the growing number of biology majors, a cluster of course-based research experiences in microbial ecology was developed. A former research lab space was converted to a collaborative teaching lab to serve the growth in course offerings, as well as to accommodate multiple microbial ecology research projects occurring in the same space. The courses offered appeal to students, build on the strengths of faculty experiences, and facilitate collaboration amongst students and with the greater Atlanta community. To ensure that our CUREs are accessible to the diverse students in our department, we addressed a variety of logistical and curricular challenges. Solutions to such challenges align with the goals of the university to offer research and signature experiences to ensure students are included and trained in STEM skills. ©2020 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32313597      PMCID: PMC7148149          DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.2047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1935-7877


INTRODUCTION

As STEM undergraduate enrollment increased, requisite growth to support meaningful STEM research, including available research assistantships in independent faculty-mentored research labs, stagnated. Among institutions striving to improve undergraduate education, Georgia State University (GSU) has been recognized for its holistic efforts to seek this improvement, including its focus on innovative teaching (1). Using the focus of such innovative efforts, we established a cluster of microbial ecology labs to increase availability of authentic research experiences, promote community engagement, improve career readiness, and foster the inclusion of the diverse GSU student body within the scientific research culture of the university. The GSU main campus is in downtown Atlanta, Georgia, enrolling 44,720 students. GSU is a minority-serving institution with a strong non-traditional student representation. In 2018, GSU was ranked #1 nonprofit or public university for conferring both undergraduate and graduate degrees to African-Americans, Asians, and Latinos in the University system of Georgia. In 2019, the incoming freshman class represented 160 nations and territories, with 36% of the incoming class being Black, and the university was ranked the 10th most ethnically diverse university in the United States in 2019 (2, 3). In 2018–2019, there were 2,300 undergraduate Biology majors and only 14 Biology faculty with active research labs. Four of these labs had a prokaryotic focus (4, 5). Such numbers indicate a serious lack of research overall and a particular dearth in areas of microbiology. Currently, biology majors do not have the opportunity to take biology courses until their sophomore year, shortening their exposure to the biological sciences and the breadth of related career opportunities, thereby leading to retention issues in the major, and a potential lack of graduate and career preparedness. As a component of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) accreditation review process, which occurs every five years, each institution is required to develop a Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) (6). This QEP is intended to provide a framework by which the institution strives to improve student learning outcomes and/or student success. As a part of the most recent accreditation review, GSU faculty and students identified the College to Career (C2C) initiative as the QEP for the next five years to develop the future of the university (7). The intent is to provide faculty with guidance and support to transform the student learning experience into one that focuses on the knowledge, skills, and abilities for students to be successful in their chosen careers. In accordance with the C2C initiative, our goal is to demonstrate how a cluster of CUREs can be developed on an urban campus to broadly reach students, enhance microbiology research opportunities, and connect with the local community and industries. These programmatic enhancements align with GSU’s new C2C initiative and will, hopefully, allow us to leverage existing relationships and develop new opportunities to bring in resources and continue to grow our impact for our students. Based upon the need for research-based career competencies, including microbiology (8), a cluster of four microbial ecology (ME) CUREs was developed (Table 1). The CUREs create an inclusive opportunity through a collaborative space and complementary topics based on instructor research strengths (9). Labs include computer and bench work, with all benchwork following BSL2 Laboratory Safety Guidelines due to the presence of unknown microorganisms. Overall, CUREs improve student access to research opportunities and persistence in STEM; additionally, they incorporate outreach and interdisciplinary studies (10–16). CURE students are motivated to develop novel research questions, conduct basic microbiology lab processes, analyze and interpret data, and communicate scientific findings through written and oral presentations to their peers and the broader university community (17, 18). Interpersonal skills are strengthened through peer review and collaboration. In some cases, aspects of the methodology are prescribed and consistent across projects to emphasize key skill development. In these contexts, students still have broad flexibility in their tested variable(s) and the project’s specific application. Learning outcomes and assessment are generally similar amongst the CUREs (Table 2), with a combination of formative and summative assessments via organic and scheduled lab discussions, interim and final reports, journal club, and campus- and department-wide presentations. While students can only take one CURE each semester, they can take additional ME CUREs, in any order.
TABLE 1

Microbial ecology CURE goals and methods.

CUREPrincipal InvestigatorGoalsCommon Lab Methods
Winogradsky column (BSL2; unknown soil microorganisms)Samantha Parks

Students use locally-sourced soil to develop Winogradsky columns that challenge soil bacteria with varied spices, herbs, and essential oils that have reported antimicrobial capabilities.

Students choose compounds for challenging their columns with a consideration of their varied cultural and ethnic backgrounds.

Students use such compounds to facilitate column development, bacterial isolation and characterization, and antimicrobial assays.

Streak and spread plating

Bacterial isolation

16S rDNA PCR amplification and sequencing

Staining and microscopy

Kirby-Bauer testing

Minimum inhibitory concentrations

Bits and Code of Life (metagenomic data analysis) (no wet lab component)Jessica Joyner

Learn the computer language and analysis process behind the common bioinformatic tools.

Understand the urban microbial ecology and influences on microbial populations and human health.

Analyze metagenomic datasets to describe the urban microbiome.

Investigate 16S rRNA community datasetAnalyze metagenomic data using new bioinformatic tools
Urban Water Quality (BSL2; unknown water microorganisms)Jessica Joyner

Students select a local source for water, based on their interests.

Students investigate and monitor the water quality along with citizen scientist program.

Evaluate which monitoring and detection method best addresses their question.

Culture-based detection: IDEXX & Plate cultures

Molecular-based detection: PCR & qPCR

Fermentation Ecology (BSL2; unknown microorganisms in kombucha)Matthew Nusnbaum

Using kombucha, the lightly effervescent product of sweetened tea fermentation by a symbiotic consortium of bacteria and yeasts, students are able to ask who is in the consortium, their roles during the fermentation cycle and how they are affected by varied treatments.

Students are asked to identify treatments of interest, defend their selections and investigate pertinent hypotheses regarding the treatment effects on the microbial community.

Students are encouraged to think about what they know about the health benefits of fermented foods, as well as common, commercial kombucha flavorings.

Streak and spread plating

Bacterial isolation

16S rRNA PCR amplification and sequencing

Staining and microscopy

Kirby-Bauer testing

CO2 monitoring

pH monitoring

TABLE 2

Microbial Ecology CUREs’ common learning objectives with the associated acquired career skills and example learning assessments (italicized content).

Learning ObjectiveExample Career Skill and AssessmentASM Curriculum GuidelinesNACE Competency
Collaborate to develop authentic research questions and testable hypotheses.

Science process and writing

Group work dynamics

Gallery walk to review questions and provide constructive feedback

Scientific Thinking: 28 – Ability to apply the process of science

Critical Thinking/Problem Solving

Oral/Written communications

Teamwork/Collaboration

Leadership

Professionalism/Work Ethic

Global/Intercultural Fluency

Demonstrate an understanding of primary literature that informs project background and results interpretation.

Scientific literacy

Partner presentations of primary literature and guided class discussion

Scientific Thinking: 29 – Ability to use quantitative reasoning

Critical Thinking/Problem Solving

Oral/Written communications

Teamwork/Collaboration

Digital Technology

Career Management

Identify and apply appropriate techniques and skills to implement experimental design for data collection.

Experimental design

Vision board of example figures

Present and critique data figures from publications

Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 34 – Use appropriate methods to identify microorganisms

Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 35 – Estimate the number of microorganisms in a sample

Critical Thinking/Problem Solving

Oral/Written communications

Digital Technology

Maintain a precise and relevant laboratory notebook.

Scientific literacy

Periodical submissions with instructor feedback

Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 38 – Document and report on experimental protocols, results and conclusions.

Critical Thinking/Problem Solving

Oral/Written communications

Leadership

Professionalism/Work Ethic

Accurately represent data and communicate to a general audience in both written and oral format.

Group work dynamics

Iterative development of research poster

STEM Conference participation

Final report as a scientific publication

Final research presentations

Scientific Thinking: 29 – Ability to use quantitative reasoning

Scientific Thinking: 30 – Ability to communicate and collaborate with other disciplines

Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 38 – Document and report on experimental protocols, results and conclusions.

Critical Thinking/Problem Solving

Oral/Written communications

Teamwork/Collaboration

Digital Technology

Leadership

Professionalism/Work Ethic

Career Management

Understand microbiota form rich, complex communities.

Broader impacts of group data

‘Chalk-talk’ about key result

Microbial Systems: 20 – Microorganisms are ubiquitous and live in diverse and dynamic ecosystems.

Microbial Systems: 21 – Most bacteria in nature live in biofilm communities

Impact of Microorganisms: 27 – Because the true diversity of microbial life is largely unknown, its effects and potential benefits have not been fully explored.

Oral/Written communications

Teamwork/Collaboration

Interpret how microbiota play key functional roles in diverse ecosystems and the relevance to society.

Quantitative reasoning

Partner presentations of primary literature and guided class discussion

STEM Conference participation

Final report as a scientific publication

Final research presentations

Metabolic Pathways: 11 – Bacteria and Archaea exhibit extensive, and often unique, metabolic diversity.

Metabolic Pathways: 13 – The survival and growth of any microorganism in a given environment depends on its metabolic characteristics.

Impact of Microorganisms: 25 – Microorganisms provide essential models that give us fundamental knowledge about life processes.

Scientific Thinking: 31 – Ability to understand the relationship between science and society

Global/Intercultural Fluency

Critical Thinking/Problem Solving

Analyze how microbial interactions and environmental pressures drive selection within ecological populations.

Qualitative reasoning

Final report as a scientific publication

Final research presentations

Evolution: 2 – Mutations and horizontal gene transfer, with the immense variety of microenvironments, have selected for a huge diversity of microorganisms.

Evolution: 3 – Human impact on the environment influences the evolution of microorganisms.

Microbial Systems: 22 – Microorganisms and their environment interact with and modify each other.

Digital Technology

Critical Thinking/Problem Solving

The course information is then aligned with American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Curriculum Guidelines and National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) competencies.

Microbial ecology CURE goals and methods. Students use locally-sourced soil to develop Winogradsky columns that challenge soil bacteria with varied spices, herbs, and essential oils that have reported antimicrobial capabilities. Students choose compounds for challenging their columns with a consideration of their varied cultural and ethnic backgrounds. Students use such compounds to facilitate column development, bacterial isolation and characterization, and antimicrobial assays. Streak and spread plating Bacterial isolation 16S rDNA PCR amplification and sequencing Staining and microscopy Kirby-Bauer testing Minimum inhibitory concentrations Learn the computer language and analysis process behind the common bioinformatic tools. Understand the urban microbial ecology and influences on microbial populations and human health. Analyze metagenomic datasets to describe the urban microbiome. Students select a local source for water, based on their interests. Students investigate and monitor the water quality along with citizen scientist program. Evaluate which monitoring and detection method best addresses their question. Culture-based detection: IDEXX & Plate cultures Molecular-based detection: PCR & qPCR Using kombucha, the lightly effervescent product of sweetened tea fermentation by a symbiotic consortium of bacteria and yeasts, students are able to ask who is in the consortium, their roles during the fermentation cycle and how they are affected by varied treatments. Students are asked to identify treatments of interest, defend their selections and investigate pertinent hypotheses regarding the treatment effects on the microbial community. Students are encouraged to think about what they know about the health benefits of fermented foods, as well as common, commercial kombucha flavorings. Streak and spread plating Bacterial isolation 16S rRNA PCR amplification and sequencing Staining and microscopy Kirby-Bauer testing CO2 monitoring pH monitoring Microbial Ecology CUREs’ common learning objectives with the associated acquired career skills and example learning assessments (italicized content). Science process and writing Group work dynamics Gallery walk to review questions and provide constructive feedback Scientific Thinking: 28 – Ability to apply the process of science Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Oral/Written communications Teamwork/Collaboration Leadership Professionalism/Work Ethic Global/Intercultural Fluency Scientific literacy Partner presentations of primary literature and guided class discussion Scientific Thinking: 29 – Ability to use quantitative reasoning Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Oral/Written communications Teamwork/Collaboration Digital Technology Career Management Experimental design Vision board of example figures Present and critique data figures from publications Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 34 – Use appropriate methods to identify microorganisms Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 35 – Estimate the number of microorganisms in a sample Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Oral/Written communications Digital Technology Scientific literacy Periodical submissions with instructor feedback Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 38 – Document and report on experimental protocols, results and conclusions. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Oral/Written communications Leadership Professionalism/Work Ethic Group work dynamics Iterative development of research poster STEM Conference participation Final report as a scientific publication Final research presentations Scientific Thinking: 29 – Ability to use quantitative reasoning Scientific Thinking: 30 – Ability to communicate and collaborate with other disciplines Microbiology Laboratory Skills: 38 – Document and report on experimental protocols, results and conclusions. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Oral/Written communications Teamwork/Collaboration Digital Technology Leadership Professionalism/Work Ethic Career Management Broader impacts of group data ‘Chalk-talk’ about key result Microbial Systems: 20 – Microorganisms are ubiquitous and live in diverse and dynamic ecosystems. Microbial Systems: 21 – Most bacteria in nature live in biofilm communities Impact of Microorganisms: 27 – Because the true diversity of microbial life is largely unknown, its effects and potential benefits have not been fully explored. Oral/Written communications Teamwork/Collaboration Quantitative reasoning Partner presentations of primary literature and guided class discussion STEM Conference participation Final report as a scientific publication Final research presentations Metabolic Pathways: 11 – Bacteria and Archaea exhibit extensive, and often unique, metabolic diversity. Metabolic Pathways: 13 – The survival and growth of any microorganism in a given environment depends on its metabolic characteristics. Impact of Microorganisms: 25 – Microorganisms provide essential models that give us fundamental knowledge about life processes. Scientific Thinking: 31 – Ability to understand the relationship between science and society Global/Intercultural Fluency Critical Thinking/Problem Solving Qualitative reasoning Final report as a scientific publication Final research presentations Evolution: 2 – Mutations and horizontal gene transfer, with the immense variety of microenvironments, have selected for a huge diversity of microorganisms. Evolution: 3 – Human impact on the environment influences the evolution of microorganisms. Microbial Systems: 22 – Microorganisms and their environment interact with and modify each other. Digital Technology Critical Thinking/Problem Solving The course information is then aligned with American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Curriculum Guidelines and National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) competencies.

Winogradsky columns

The Winogradsky course (19) invites students to investigate soil microbial communities and the response to naturally sourced antimicrobial compounds. Key questions investigated by this lab involve the impact of essential oils, spices, and herbs upon the efficacy of antibiotics used to challenge microbial isolates. Students use locally sourced soil to develop Winogradsky Columns that challenge soil bacteria with varied spices, herbs, and essential oils that have reported antimicrobial capabilities. Students choose the compounds for challenging their Winogradsky columns with a consideration of their varied cultural and ethnic backgrounds. They are asked to consider what natural antimicrobial compounds they have previously been introduced to through family, news, culture, or other venues. These considerations promote cultural awareness and an inclusive lab environment. Once the compound is selected, it is vetted for relevance and appropriateness. Students then develop the columns and isolate and characterize bacteria, including assaying the antimicrobial sensitivity profiles, biofilm capacity, minimum inhibitory concentration of the compound of interest, and phylogeny of the isolates. While similar selective enrichment and Winogradsky columns may be used in other university (GSU and beyond) undergraduate research labs, the focus on natural antimicrobial compounds with significance to the GSU student body is unique. The inclusion of scientific research from countries that more commonly use such natural antimicrobials, as well as discussing how compounds such as black seed oil, basil, garlic, peppermint, and turmeric are used worldwide, facilitates an understanding of varied cultural norms.

Bits and code of life

The Bits and Code of Life, or metagenomic data analysis course, was developed in response to the need for students to be trained in the processing and analysis of the data rapidly accumulating from the plethora of metagenomic projects (20, 21). An existing bacteria community dataset (16S rRNA sequenced with Illumina MiSeq), focused on the bacterial communities of the urban environment, is provided for students to use as the primary resource for their independent projects. Given the urban context that is the daily life of GSU students, this course encourages them to consider and expand upon their experiences as they explore the microbial ecology of their environment. Students ask novel questions that include their interest and interaction with the urban environment, enhancing their understanding of microbial ecology as both participants and researchers in an urban context. The course includes the challenge of learning the language and process behind the common bioinformatic tools as well as microbial ecology, building from methods and content of similar courses or modules that incorporate bioinformatics (22–24). This process has been shown to provide students essential skills for careers such as a physician or lab technician (24). They exercise their newfound skills in writing computer scripts and using existing bioinformatic programs and processes. The course uses free or open access programs (e.g., Virtual Box, QIIME [25, 26], R [27]) to facilitate translation of course activities to graduate or professional positions without the dependency on academic subscriptions to resources. Following the mastery of the traditional process to analyze metagenomic data, students are encouraged to test out new ways to analyze the data, using new processes or tools they create or find. The students then craft presentations to share their new microbial perspective of their environment and campus with other students.

Urban water quality

The investigative process for the Urban Water Quality course includes the common methods used by monitoring and regulatory agencies. Urban watersheds are under increasing pressure due to population growth and land development, with a strong impact on the microbial community (28, 29). Students select local water resources to sample, which removes a bias for neighborhoods with greater financial or political interest that can be present for typical monitoring programs. Research questions will be around the theme of urban water quality, and they will be inclusive of students’ local knowledge and interests when determining their specific question regarding the ecological influences on sites and potential contamination. Water contamination is detected with indicator bacteria of sewage pollution, following the standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (e.g., Method 1600 [30]) and protocols of local monitoring groups. Students will apply various methods to detect indicator bacteria, including IDEXX Enterolert (31), Petrifilm cultures (32), PCR (33), qPCR (34), and microbiome sequencing (35, 36). As part of their independent research, students will evaluate which monitoring or detection method best addresses their question, including the appropriate sampling schema (37, 38). Campus and community partnerships will facilitate collecting and analyzing nutrient levels and additional environmental data. Student results will contribute to the local knowledge regarding water quality, including generating data reports for local agencies and monitoring groups. The greatest contribution that the students have the opportunity to make is in researching how the local environment and public health are related in geographic areas in which they have a vested interest.

Fermentation ecology

Fermentation Ecology offers students an amenable tool, kombucha, to develop and test authentic research questions on a complex microbial community. The organizing research question in this lab focuses on how treatment with botanical flavorings and antimicrobial compounds affects the community dynamic and physiology of the complex microbial community responsible for kombucha fermentation. Students identify testable treatments for the kombucha based on their own interests, including cultural and ethnic histories, and commercially available flavorings of kombucha. We also seek to isolate and identify the key members of the consortium in the lab’s continuously evolving kombucha culture. Fermentation and brewing are inherently interesting to many students, even before they discover the rich microbiological background and potential applications of these fields of study. The interest in fermentation and fermented foods cuts across cultural and experiential lines, with lively discussions in the lab about beer, wine, cheese, yogurt and culturally traditional fermented foods, promoting multicultural dialogue and inclusivity in the classroom. Lab courses that incorporate fermentation biology in the form of beer and wine analysis provide an opportunity to capture students’ interests and offer training in lab techniques, experimental design, and scientific literacy (39, 40). Kombucha fermentation has also been used to teach analytical chemistry in a traditional lab setting, though not as an inquiry-based, CURE-style course (41). This engagement leads students to consider the applications of their research and think about how laboratory skills can apply to a variety of career opportunities they may not have previously known exist. In Fermentation Ecology students identify their own research questions and work collaboratively to design appropriate experiments to test their hypotheses. Student success in the course requires a familiarization with a new field of literature, rigorous application of the scientific method, creative problem-solving skills, and team work, as well as data analysis, writing, and oral presentation skills.

Lab space development

A graduate research lab was retrofitted to function as the ME collaborative instructional research lab. Developing the space accommodated for multiple workflows and sharing equipment, ensuring effectiveness for the different goals and approaches of each CURE. The lab space has a central room, where students work and collaborate, and separate, adjoining rooms for specific research applications. The central room was organized such that there are desk-height areas for student work with laptops and lab notebooks, and flexible student space with bench-height tables. The central lab also includes refrigerators, freezers, incubators and other shared equipment. Adjoining spaces include a clean room for molecular work, a thermocycler and gel electrophoresis room, a media preparation and growing room, a staining and microscopy room and a storage/collaboration space for student personal items. An additional adjoining room includes solution preparation areas and a fume hood with chemical storage and incubators. The combination of open and compartmentalized lab space encourages collaboration and fosters a research community amongst the CURE students. Students are encouraged to make the space their own and use it for group planning meetings as well as lab work.

CONCLUSION

Students self-select into CUREs according to their interest and schedule. Several ME CUREs have no prerequisites, thus providing opportunities for first- and second-year undergraduates. Inherent in the CURE program is an opportunity for students to gain valuable research experience without searching for exclusive mentored experiences in faculty research labs. CUREs provide many of these same training opportunities (8) through a process that students are familiar with, course registration, while also providing graduation requirement credit and resume building. The diversified structure of the ME CUREs topics and skills provides experiences for all students. Students who may not elect to continue their education following graduation gain experience that can help them on a path towards technical careers in clinical laboratories or government agencies. These courses are designed to serve the students regardless of career trajectory, preparing students with the career competencies necessary to be successful in any professional environment. The CUREs have broader impacts through community involvement and outreach. The Winogradsky column and kombucha courses are involved with an annual Fermentation Fest: students host a science corner about microbial ecology, fermentation, and antimicrobials that students investigated. This outreach bridged communication with a local kombucha brewing company, leading to conversations about career readiness and job opportunities. The water quality lab will generate actionable data following regulatory protocols for monitoring and detection at sites with local relevance to students. Interdisciplinary collaboration opportunities include chemistry (kombucha and antimicrobial additives), computer science (metagenomic data analysis processes and tools), and geosciences (built environmental design impacts on water quality). The ME CUREs are invested in impactful research experiences for our students. Currently, all three faculty members are conducting IRB-approved (H19106) research to investigate the impact of CUREs upon STEM identity, confidence, and persistence. In order to achieve success in developing a variety of ME CUREs, a series of complex challenges had to be overcome, both logistical and organizational in nature. To convince departmental leadership, we had to develop a strong rationale for the value of the courses, in spite of their relatively high per-student cost, demand for dedicated, specially designed laboratory space, and commitment to offer these courses instead of other, more traditional, lab/lecture courses. One compromise for meeting teaching needs of other courses was to adjust to the University’s suggestion of increasing course enrollment in lecture courses. Allowing larger enrollments in required lecture courses, without compromising our teaching philosophies, increased the available time for both students and instructors to schedule a ME CURE. By offering a variety of ME CURE topics from a group of experienced instructors who collaborate closely together, we provide a wealth of experience to our students and an area of strength for our department. Such experiences are further magnified through incorporation of discussions about the multicultural impacts and relevance that the labs yield via the experimental design, as well as through the community engagement and activities that are incorporated into the labs. The ME CUREs’ impact is magnified by the diversity of students offered microbial research opportunities. While these students may be enrolled in different ME CUREs, they are encouraged to interact during community events on and off campus as well as recruit friends to join in future ME CUREs and events. Such opportunities align with the GSU C2C QEP and provide students with career-relevant experiences and professional connections. Inclusion of career competencies and community outreach furthers the STEM opportunities for students, and aids in retention and entry into STEM professions.
  26 in total

1.  Brewing for Students: An Inquiry-Based Microbiology Lab.

Authors:  Brian K Sato; Usman Alam; Samantha J Dacanay; Amanda K Lee; Justin F Shaffer
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Distribution of human-specific bacteroidales and fecal indicator bacteria in an urban watershed impacted by sewage pollution, determined using RNA- and DNA-based quantitative PCR assays.

Authors:  Vikram Kapoor; Tarja Pitkänen; Hodon Ryu; Michael Elk; David Wendell; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The Development of Curricular Guidelines for Introductory Microbiology that Focus on Understanding.

Authors:  Susan Merkel
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2012-05-03

4.  GCAT-SEEKquence: genome consortium for active teaching of undergraduates through increased faculty access to next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Vincent P Buonaccorsi; Michael D Boyle; Deborah Grove; Craig Praul; Eric Sakk; Ash Stuart; Tammy Tobin; Jay Hosler; Susan L Carney; Michael J Engle; Barry E Overton; Jeffrey D Newman; Marie Pizzorno; Jennifer R Powell; Nancy Trun
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Sewage reflects the microbiomes of human populations.

Authors:  Ryan J Newton; Sandra L McLellan; Deborah K Dila; Joseph H Vineis; Hilary G Morrison; A Murat Eren; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive.

Authors:  Gita Bangera; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Prevalence and characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from the Upper Oconee Watershed in Northeast Georgia.

Authors:  Sohyun Cho; Lari M Hiott; John B Barrett; Elizabeth A McMillan; Sandra L House; Shaheen B Humayoun; Eric S Adams; Charlene R Jackson; Jonathan G Frye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences.

Authors:  Katelyn M Cooper; Logan E Gin; Barierane Akeeh; Carolyn E Clark; Joshua S Hunter; Travis B Roderick; Deanna B Elliott; Luis A Gutierrez; Rebecca M Mello; Leilani D Pfeiffer; Rachel A Scott; Denisse Arellano; Diana Ramirez; Emma M Valdez; Cindy Vargas; Kimberly Velarde; Yi Zheng; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of Enterococcus species diversity in marine water and wastewater using Enterolert and EPA Method 1600.

Authors:  Donna M Ferguson; John F Griffith; Charles D McGee; Stephen B Weisberg; Charles Hagedorn
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-06-10

10.  A proposed minimum skill set for university graduates to meet the informatics needs and challenges of the "-omics" era.

Authors:  Tin Wee Tan; Shen Jean Lim; Asif M Khan; Shoba Ranganathan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Microbiomes for All.

Authors:  Theodore R Muth; Avrom J Caplan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Antiracist Opportunities in the Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education: Considerations for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

Authors:  C L Nardi
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2021-07-30

3.  Development of a Remote, Course-Based Undergraduate Experience to Facilitate In Silico Study of Microbial Metabolic Pathways.

Authors:  Samantha T Parks; Caroline Taylor
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2022-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.