Literature DB >> 32313503

Remarkably High Efficacy of Cenobamate in Adults With Focal-Onset Seizures: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

David G Vossler.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32313503      PMCID: PMC7160883          DOI: 10.1177/1535759720903032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Curr        ISSN: 1535-7511            Impact factor:   7.500


× No keyword cloud information.

Commentary

Cenobamate (YKP3089) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on November 21, 2019, for the treatment of partial- (focal-) onset seizures in adults.[1] It is a novel tetrazole alkyl carbamate derivative,[1] structurally different from carisbamate. It was effective in animal models of epilepsy, including the maximal electroshock seizure test, seizures produced by picrotoxin and pentylenetatrazol, the hippocampal kindled rat model, and the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model.[2] Cenobamate suppressed the photoparoxysmal response in photosensitive epilepsy at 250 mg and 400 mg single doses in one small human epilepsy study.[3] Cenobamate (CNB) reduces repetitive neuronal firing by inhibiting voltage-gated sodium currents.[1] Specifically, it enhances the fast and slow inactivation of sodium channels and potently inhibits the noninactivating persistent component of the sodium channel current (INaP) by which many ASMs, notably lacosamide, are believed to work.[2-4] Also, CNB is a positive allosteric modulator of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) ion channel.[1] At least 88% of CNB is absorbed following oral administration, with a Tmax of 1 to 4 hours, and terminal half-life of 50 to 60 hours.[1] The drug is extensively metabolized via glucuronidation and oxidation, so drug–drug interactions exist. Cenobamate inhibits CYP2C19, so it increases phenytoin Cmax 70% and phenobarbital 34%. By contrast, CNB induces CYP3A4, so lamotrigine serum concentrations are expected to fall 21% to 52%. Administration of phenytoin causes CNB serum concentrations to fall 27% to 28%. In the above clinical trial (YKP3089-C017), adults were given adjunctive placebo or 1 of 3 doses of CNB.[4] An inclusion criterion was ≥8 focal-onset seizures with an objective, observable component during an 8-week baseline. After a 6-week titration to full dose, patients were maintained on their assigned dose of CNB during the 12-week maintenance phase. If the assigned dose of CNB was not tolerated due to adverse effects, one blinded decrease in CNB dose was permitted. A longer titration period would have been optimal for an ASM with such a long half-life, because steady state concentrations are not reached for 4 to 5 half-lives (in this case approximately 10 days) after each dose increase. For the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) entire-treatment phase, the median percent seizure reductions were 24%, 36%, 55%, and 55% for the placebo and CNB 100, 200, and 400 mg cohorts, respectively. It should be noted that the median modal dose in the 400 mg group was actually 300 mg, presumably due to poorer tolerability of the 400 mg dose. The 400 mg group did not reach that assigned dose until the start of the maintenance phase, and steady-state serum concentration would not be reached for about 10 days later, so it is very reasonable to look at the results of just the MITT maintenance-phase cohorts. In doing so, one sees robust dose–response median percent seizure reductions of 25%, 40%, 56%, and 65% for the placebo and CNB 100, 200, and 400 mg cohorts, respectively. The 65% reduction at the maximum dose is greater than that seen in any of the pivotal studies on all the second- and third-generation ASMs. C017[4] represents “study 2” in the US prescribing information.[1] For replication, “Study 1” (YKP3089-C013) compared placebo to CNB at 200 mg/d, but used an unusually short maintenance phase of only 6 weeks. The median percent decrease in seizure frequency in the C013 “study 1” was 21.5% for placebo and 55.6% for CNB 200 mg/d.[1] The C013 study manuscript is in press at the time of this writing. In both trials, the most common adverse effects in CNB-treated patients were somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, and headache (although headache was reported in 10% of patients on CNB and 9% on placebo).[1] As is typical, adverse effects occurred in the greatest number of subjects at the highest dose. Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation were ataxia, dizziness, somnolence, diplopia, nystagmus, and vertigo. Hyperkalemia (greater than 5 meq/L) was seen, and followed a dose–response relationship. Shortening of the electrocardiogram QT interval occurred in a greater percentage of CNB than placebo patients. The incidence of psychiatric adverse effects was low. Three cases of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS, formerly “multiorgan hypersensitivity”) occurred in the C13 and C17 studies in which CNB was titrated quickly, but no cases of DRESS were reported in a much larger, open-label safety study (YKP3089-C021) of 1339 adults with focal-onset seizures when CNB was started at just 12.5 mg/d and titrated every 2 weeks.[1] Hence, a “start low and go slow” titration schedule of 12.5 mg/d for weeks 1 and 2, 25 mg/d for weeks 3 and 4, 50 mg/d for weeks 5 and 6, 100 mg per day for weeks 7 and 8, and then 200 mg/d is recommended.[1] If needed, the dose may be slowly titrated up to a maximum of 400 mg given once daily.[1] In clinical trials, it appears that CNB may be one of the most effective ASMs, but we don’t yet know if this will be borne out in clinical practice. In addition to the high median percent reductions in the 12-week maintenance phase, the seizure-free rate is very high compared to ASMs approved since 1994. In a meta-analysis[5] of the results of 62 pivotal placebo-controlled randomized trials of lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, zonisamide, pregabalin, lacosamide, and eslicarbazepine, and in pooled analyses of the 3 pivotal trials conducted both for perampanel[6] and for brivaracetam,[7] seizure-free rates ranged from 0% to 6.5%.[5] By comparison, the seizure-free rate was 1% in the placebo group and 21% in the CNB 400 mg group.[1] Although no accurate comparisons can be made between the results of these various studies done with different protocols, and at different times and locations around the world, the high seizure-free rate in the C017 study is unique. In an analysis of the seizure-free rate of newly diagnosed patients treated at the Western Infirmary in Glasgow, Scotland between 1982 and 2012, Chen et al reported in 2018 that the seizure-free rates for 1+ year with the first ASM, second ASM regimen, and third ASM regimen were 45.7%, 11.6%, and 4.4%, respectively.[8] These results were nearly identical to those published in 2000 using older ASMs at the same institution by Kwan and Brodie.[9] These data suggest that despite the introduction of numerous new ASMs, some with novel mechanisms of action, in the 18 years between their first report and their most recent one, little has changed in the percentage of persons with epilepsy achieving the ultimate goal of seizure-freedom (with its attendant major benefits in quality of life). If CNB maintains its high seizure-free rate in long-term use, then it may represent an important new ASM.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical comparability of the new antiepileptic drugs in refractory partial epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  João Costa; Filipa Fareleira; Raquel Ascenção; Margarida Borges; Cristina Sampaio; António Vaz-Carneiro
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Treated With Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs: A 30-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhibin Chen; Martin J Brodie; Danny Liew; Patrick Kwan
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  Early identification of refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  P Kwan; M J Brodie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Safety and efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate (YKP3089) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial.

Authors:  Gregory L Krauss; Pavel Klein; Christian Brandt; Sang Kun Lee; Ivan Milanov; Maja Milovanovic; Bernhard J Steinhoff; Marc Kamin
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Effects of cenobamate (YKP3089), a newly developed anti-epileptic drug, on voltage-gated sodium channels in rat hippocampal CA3 neurons.

Authors:  Michiko Nakamura; Jin-Hwa Cho; Hyewon Shin; Il-Sung Jang
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel for the treatment of refractory partial seizures: a pooled analysis of three phase III studies.

Authors:  Bernhard J Steinhoff; Elinor Ben-Menachem; Philippe Ryvlin; Simon Shorvon; Lynn Kramer; Andrew Satlin; David Squillacote; Haichen Yang; Jin Zhu; Antonio Laurenza
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Suppression of the photoparoxysmal response in photosensitive epilepsy with cenobamate (YKP3089).

Authors:  Dorothee G A Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite; Bree D DiVentura; John R Pollard; Gregory L Krauss; Sarah Mizne; Jacqueline A French
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Efficacy and safety of brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures in 3 pooled clinical studies.

Authors:  Elinor Ben-Menachem; Rūta Mameniškienė; Pier Paolo Quarato; Pavel Klein; Jessica Gamage; Jimmy Schiemann; Martin E Johnson; John Whitesides; Belinda McDonough; Klaus Eckhardt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 9.910

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Sleep Disruption Worsens Seizures: Neuroinflammation as a Potential Mechanistic Link.

Authors:  Herlinda Bonilla-Jaime; Helena Zeleke; Asheebo Rojas; Claudia Espinosa-Garcia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of cenobamate, a novel antiseizure medication, in healthy Japanese, and an ethnic comparison with healthy non-Japanese.

Authors:  Eunsol Yang; Jung Sunwoo; Ki Young Huh; Yu Kyong Kim; SeungHwan Lee; In-Jin Jang; Kyung-Sang Yu
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 3.  Cenobamate for treatment-resistant focal seizures: current evidence and place in therapy.

Authors:  Alok Singh
Journal:  J Cent Nerv Syst Dis       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 4.  New Methods Used in Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Monitoring of the First and Newer Generations of Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs).

Authors:  Karina Sommerfeld-Klatta; Barbara Zielińska-Psuja; Marta Karaźniewcz-Łada; Franciszek K Główka
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.