| Literature DB >> 32312864 |
Yang Liu1,2, Bei Mao1,2, Shuo Liang1,2, Jia-Wei Yang1,2, Hai-Wen Lu1,2, Yan-Hua Chai1,2, Lan Wang3, Li Zhang1, Qiu-Hong Li1, Lan Zhao1, Yan He1, Xiao-Long Gu4, Xiao-Bin Ji5, Li Li6, Zhi-Jun Jie7, Qiang Li8, Xiang-Yang Li9, Hong-Zhou Lu10, Wen-Hong Zhang11, Yuan-Lin Song12, Jie-Ming Qu13,2, Jin-Fu Xu1,2.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32312864 PMCID: PMC7173682 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01112-2020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Respir J ISSN: 0903-1936 Impact factor: 16.671
FIGURE 1Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 between two age groups, <60 and ≥60 years. a) Age distribution for all 221 COVID-19 patients in Shanghai. Correlations were investigated between the age of patients and b) lymphocyte count (r= −0.432, p<0.001), c) albumin level (r= −0.569, p<0.001), d) C-reactive protein (CRP) level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and e) radiologically affected lobes. The difference in f) disease severity (classified as mild, common, severe or critical, according to the guidelines from the National Health Commission of China [8], but with no mild patients in our cohort), g) treatment, and h) disease course and rate of respiratory failure in the two age groups were also investigated. Cure rates of COVID-19 are shown for i) all 221 patients, j) males, k) females and l) those with respiratory failure. *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001.