Jiaojiao Hu1, Yingying Mao1, Yi Zhang1, Ding Ye1, Chengping Wen1, Zhijun Xie2. 1. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China. 2. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China. xzj575@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of moxibustion in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Seven electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant studies for inclusion from databases inception to December 31, 2018. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of moxibustion for AS treatment versus Western medicine (Wm) treatment were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect estimates were pooled using the fixed or random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Stratification analyses were further performed based on the treatment plan of experimental groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 1,944 AS patients. Meta-analysis showed that compared with those receiving Wm treatment alone, patients receiving moxibustion combined with Wm treatment or moxibustion alone had a higher clinical efficacy rate [odds ratio (OR) =4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.91 to 6.10, P<0.001 for moxibustion combined with Wm versus Wm; OR =2.43, 95% CI: 1.62 to 3.65, P<0.001 for moxibustion alone versus Wm]. In addition, patients receiving moxibustion combined with Wm treatment had lower levels of C-reactive protein [weighed-median difference (WMD) =-6.33, 95% CI: -9.64 to -3.01, P<0.001] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (WMD =-7.86, 95% CI: -11.26 to -4.46, P<0.001) after treatment, respectively. Furthermore, moxibustion could also improve Schober test scores (WMD =0.85, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.55, P=0.017), occipital-wall distances (WMD =-0.55, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.19, P=0.003), and finger-ground distances (WMD =-3.64, 95% CI: -5.61 to -1.68, P<0.001) of AS patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that moxibustion is an effective complementary treatment for AS patients. However, further large-scale multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.
BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of moxibustion in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Seven electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant studies for inclusion from databases inception to December 31, 2018. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of moxibustion for AS treatment versus Western medicine (Wm) treatment were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect estimates were pooled using the fixed or random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Stratification analyses were further performed based on the treatment plan of experimental groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 1,944 AS patients. Meta-analysis showed that compared with those receiving Wm treatment alone, patients receiving moxibustion combined with Wm treatment or moxibustion alone had a higher clinical efficacy rate [odds ratio (OR) =4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.91 to 6.10, P<0.001 for moxibustion combined with Wm versus Wm; OR =2.43, 95% CI: 1.62 to 3.65, P<0.001 for moxibustion alone versus Wm]. In addition, patients receiving moxibustion combined with Wm treatment had lower levels of C-reactive protein [weighed-median difference (WMD) =-6.33, 95% CI: -9.64 to -3.01, P<0.001] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (WMD =-7.86, 95% CI: -11.26 to -4.46, P<0.001) after treatment, respectively. Furthermore, moxibustion could also improve Schober test scores (WMD =0.85, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.55, P=0.017), occipital-wall distances (WMD =-0.55, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.19, P=0.003), and finger-ground distances (WMD =-3.64, 95% CI: -5.61 to -1.68, P<0.001) of AS patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that moxibustion is an effective complementary treatment for AS patients. However, further large-scale multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.