Literature DB >> 32312045

Lipid Chemical Structure Modulates the Disruptive Effects of Nanomaterials on Membrane Models.

Saeed Nazemidashtarjandi, Amid Vahedi, Amir M Farnoud.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms by which engineered nanomaterials disrupt the cell plasma membrane is crucial in advancing the industrial and biomedical applications of nanotechnology. While the role of nanoparticle properties in inducing membrane damage has received significant attention, the role of the lipid chemical structure in regulating such interactions is less explored. Here, we investigated the role of the lipid chemical structure in the disruption of lipid vesicles by unmodified silica, carboxyl-modified silica, and unmodified polystyrene nanoparticles (50 nm). The role of the lipid headgroup was examined by comparing nanoparticle effects on vesicles composed of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) vs an inverse phosphocholine (PC) with the same acyl chain structure. The role of acyl chain saturation was examined by comparing nanoparticle effects on saturated vs unsaturated PCs and sphingomyelins. Nanoparticle effects on PCs (glycerol backbone) vs sphingomyelins (sphingosine backbone) were also examined. Results showed that the lipid headgroup, backbone, and acyl chain saturation affect nanoparticle binding to and disruption of the membranes. A low headgroup tilt angle and the presence of a trimethylammonium moiety at the vesicle surface are required for unmodified nanoparticles to induce membrane disruption. Lipid backbone structure significantly affects nanoparticle-membrane interactions, with carboxyl-modified particles only disrupting lipids containing cis unsaturation and a sphingosine backbone. Acyl chain saturation makes vesicles more resistant to particles by increasing lipid packing in vesicles, impeding molecular interactions. Finally, nanoparticles were capable of changing the lipid packing, resulting in pore formation in the process. These observations are important in interpreting nanoparticle toxicity to biological membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32312045      PMCID: PMC8725912          DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  35 in total

1.  Engineering particles for therapeutic delivery: prospects and challenges.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Georgina K Such; Angus P R Johnston; James P Best; Frank Caruso
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  The formation of supported lipid bilayers on silica nanoparticles revealed by cryoelectron microscopy.

Authors:  Stéphane Mornet; Olivier Lambert; Etienne Duguet; Alain Brisson
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 3.  Nanoparticle interaction with biological membranes: does nanotechnology present a Janus face?

Authors:  Pascale R Leroueil; Seungpyo Hong; Almut Mecke; James R Baker; Bradford G Orr; Mark M Banaszak Holl
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  Nanoparticle adhesion to the cell membrane and its effect on nanoparticle uptake efficiency.

Authors:  Anna Lesniak; Anna Salvati; Maria J Santos-Martinez; Marek W Radomski; Kenneth A Dawson; Christoffer Åberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  Outdoor urban nanomaterials: The emergence of a new, integrated, and critical field of study.

Authors:  Mohammed Baalousha; Yi Yang; Marina E Vance; Benjamin P Colman; Samantha McNeal; Jie Xu; Joanna Blaszczak; Meredith Steele; Emily Bernhardt; Michael F Hochella
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Native silica nanoparticles are powerful membrane disruptors.

Authors:  Hend I Alkhammash; Nan Li; Rémy Berthier; Maurits R R de Planque
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Factors affecting the oral uptake and translocation of polystyrene nanoparticles: histological and analytical evidence.

Authors:  A T Florence; A M Hillery; N Hussain; P U Jani
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.121

Review 8.  Lateral organisation of membrane lipids. The superlattice view.

Authors:  P Somerharju; J A Virtanen; K H Cheng
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-08-25

9.  Alteration of Membrane Compositional Asymmetry by LiCoO2 Nanosheets.

Authors:  Merve Doğangün; Mimi N Hang; Julianne M Troiano; Alicia C McGeachy; Eric S Melby; Joel A Pedersen; Robert J Hamers; Franz M Geiger
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 10.  Transmembrane asymmetry and lateral domains in biological membranes.

Authors:  Philippe F Devaux; Roger Morris
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.215

View more
  1 in total

1.  Loss of membrane asymmetry alters the interactions of erythrocytes with engineered silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Parnian Bigdelou; Amid Vahedi; Evangelia Kiosidou; Amir M Farnoud
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.456

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.