Christina M Theodorou1, Jamie E Anderson2, Megan Brenner3, Thomas M Scalea4, Kenji Inaba5, Jeremy Cannon6, Mark Seamon6, M Chance Spalding7, Charles J Fox8, Ernest E Moore8, Joseph J DuBose4, Joseph M Galante2. 1. Division of Trauma, University of California Davis Medical Center, Acute Care, and General Surgery Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: ctheodorou@ucdavis.edu. 2. Division of Trauma, University of California Davis Medical Center, Acute Care, and General Surgery Sacramento, CA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of California Riverside School of Medicine Riverside, CA. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 5. Division of Surgical Critical Care and Trauma, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Hospital, Los Angeles, CA. 6. Division of Traumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Surgical Critical Care & Emergency Surgery, Philadelphia, PA. 7. Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH. 8. Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular adjunct to hemorrhage control. Success relies on institutional support and focused training in arterial access. We hypothesized that hospitals with higher REBOA volumes will be more successful than low-volume hospitals at aortic occlusion with REBOA. METHODS: This is a retrospective study from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Registry from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients aged ≥18 y who underwent REBOA were included. Successful placement of REBOA catheters (defined as hemodynamic improvement with balloon inflation) was compared between high-volume (≥80 cases; two hospitals), mid-volume (10-20 cases; four hospitals), and low-volume (<10 cases; 14 hospitals) hospitals, adjusting for patient factors. RESULTS: Of 271 patients from 20 hospitals, 210 patients (77.5%) had successful REBOA placement. Most patients were male (76.0%) and sustained blunt trauma (78.1%). cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was ongoing at the time of REBOA placement in 34.5% of patients. Inpatient mortality was 67.4%, unchanged by hospital volume. Multivariable logistic regression found increased odds of successful REBOA placement at high-volume versus low-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 7.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.10-27.29; P = 0.002) and mid-volume versus low-volume hospitals (OR, 7.82; 95% CI, 1.52-40.31; P = 0.014) and decreased odds among patients undergoing CPR during REBOA placement (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.34; P < 0.001) when adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, prehospital CPR, CPR on admission, transfer status, hospital location of REBOA placement, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 13, and injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with higher REBOA volumes were more likely to achieve hemodynamic improvement with REBOA inflation. However, mortality and complication rates were unchanged. Independent of hospital volume, ongoing CPR is associated with a decreased odds of successful REBOA placement.
BACKGROUND:Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular adjunct to hemorrhage control. Success relies on institutional support and focused training in arterial access. We hypothesized that hospitals with higher REBOA volumes will be more successful than low-volume hospitals at aortic occlusion with REBOA. METHODS: This is a retrospective study from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Registry from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients aged ≥18 y who underwent REBOA were included. Successful placement of REBOA catheters (defined as hemodynamic improvement with balloon inflation) was compared between high-volume (≥80 cases; two hospitals), mid-volume (10-20 cases; four hospitals), and low-volume (<10 cases; 14 hospitals) hospitals, adjusting for patient factors. RESULTS: Of 271 patients from 20 hospitals, 210 patients (77.5%) had successful REBOA placement. Most patients were male (76.0%) and sustained blunt trauma (78.1%). cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was ongoing at the time of REBOA placement in 34.5% of patients. Inpatient mortality was 67.4%, unchanged by hospital volume. Multivariable logistic regression found increased odds of successful REBOA placement at high-volume versus low-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 7.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.10-27.29; P = 0.002) and mid-volume versus low-volume hospitals (OR, 7.82; 95% CI, 1.52-40.31; P = 0.014) and decreased odds among patients undergoing CPR during REBOA placement (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.34; P < 0.001) when adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, prehospital CPR, CPR on admission, transfer status, hospital location of REBOA placement, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 13, and injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with higher REBOA volumes were more likely to achieve hemodynamic improvement with REBOA inflation. However, mortality and complication rates were unchanged. Independent of hospital volume, ongoing CPR is associated with a decreased odds of successful REBOA placement.
Authors: Benjamin A Keller; Edgardo S Salcedo; Timothy K Williams; Lucas P Neff; Anthony J Carden; Yiran Li; Oren Gotlib; Nam K Tran; Joseph M Galante Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Brian Celso; Joseph Tepas; Barbara Langland-Orban; Etienne Pracht; Linda Papa; Lawrence Lottenberg; Lewis Flint Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-02
Authors: Scott A Zakaluzny; Brian C Beldowicz; Edgardo S Salcedo; Joseph J DuBose; Laura J Moore; Megan Brenner Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Ryan P Dumas; Mark J Seamon; Brian P Smith; Wei Yang; Jeremy W Cannon; C William Schwab; Patrick M Reilly; Daniel N Holena Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Boudewijn L S Borger van der Burg; T M Hörer; D Eefting; T T C F van Dongen; J F Hamming; J J DuBose; M Bowyer; R Hoencamp Journal: J R Army Med Corps Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 1.285
Authors: Jostein Rødseth Brede; Thomas Lafrenz; Andreas J Krüger; Edmund Søvik; Torjus Steffensen; Carlo Kriesi; Martin Steinert; Pål Klepstad Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Adam Power; Asha Parekh; Oonagh Scallan; Shane Smith; Teresa Novick; Neil Parry; Laura Moore Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-01-08
Authors: Yaset Caicedo; Linda M Gallego; Hugo Jc Clavijo; Natalia Padilla-Londoño; Cindy-Natalia Gallego; Isabella Caicedo-Holguín; Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez; Juan J Meléndez-Lugo; Alberto F García; Alexander E Salcedo; Michael W Parra; Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín; Carlos A Ordoñez Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2022-10-17 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Melike N Harfouche; Marta J Madurska; Noha Elansary; Hossam Abdou; Eric Lang; Joseph J DuBose; Rishi Kundi; David V Feliciano; Thomas M Scalea; Jonathan J Morrison Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240