Literature DB >> 32311497

The immunological case for staying active during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Richard J Simpson1, Emmanuel Katsanis2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32311497      PMCID: PMC7165095          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


× No keyword cloud information.

Viewpoint

On April 17th 2020, the number of people diagnosed with COVID-19 worldwide was over 2.2-million with more than 154,000 deaths. Government shelter-in-place orders have restricted the movement of ~3 billion people around the globe in an attempt to minimize the spread and devastation of this novel virus. While these countermeasures are necessary, spending prolonged periods of time in isolation and confinement, coupled with the stress and anxiety people are experiencing, are likely to lead to many other stress-related health problems. A particular concern are the restrictions these orders have placed on our daily activity and exercise routines. Regular physical activity exerts a multitude of beneficial health effects but, perhaps more importantly during this pandemic, is its ability to both enhance immune defense and mitigate the deleterious effects of stress on immunity (Duggal et al., 2019, Simpson et al., 2015). Implementations of social distancing has resulted in the mass closure of gyms and parks where exercise and training regimens would normally be undertaken, but it is essential that physical activity be encouraged during this viral outbreak. The COVID-19 pandemic has raised many questions regarding how we can boost immunity through exercise. There is no scientific data on how physical activity may enhance immune responses against coronaviruses, but we do know that having elevated levels of cardiorespiratory fitness and exercising at moderate to vigorous intensity can improve immune responses to vaccination, reduce chronic low-grade inflammation and improve various immune markers in several disease states including cancer, HIV, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cognitive impairment and obesity (Duggal et al., 2019, Walsh et al., 2011). Epidemiological data also indicate that physically active people are less likely to report symptoms of upper respiratory illness and there is evidence that exercise can protect the host from many types viral infection including influenza, rhinovirus (another cause of the common cold) and the reactivation of latent herpesviruses such as Epstein-Barr (EBV), varicella-zoster (VZV) and herpes-simplex-virus-1 (HSV-1) (Duggal et al., 2019, Martin et al., 2009). Moderate intensity exercise training during an active influenza infection has been shown to protect mice from death and promote favorable immune cell composition and cytokine shifts in the lungs associated with improved survival (Martin et al., 2009). Physically active individuals also exert better control over their latent viral infections, even during periods of isolation and confinement. For instance, recent work from our laboratory demonstrated that astronauts with increased levels of cardiorespiratory fitness and skeletal muscle endurance were ~40% less likely to reactivate a latent herpesvirus during a 6-month mission to the International Space Station (ISS), particularly if they were able to maintain their fitness levels on the ISS (Agha et al., 2020). Even in astronauts who did reactivate a virus, copies of viral DNA were fewer in the fitter astronauts indicating that they were less contagious than their less-fit counterparts. Latent viral reactivation is a hallmark of compromised immunity, which, in this context, we deem to be due to the stressors associated with isolation and inactivity as a result of confinement on the ISS. Indeed, periods of isolation and confinement elevate glucocorticoids (e.g. cortisol) that can inhibit many critical functions of our immune system. These include the ability of our lymphocytes to multiply in response infectious agents and the effector functions of NK-cells and CD8+ T-cells, all of which are essential in the recognition and elimination of cancerous or virally infected cells (Duggal et al., 2019). How exercise augments host immune defenses is multi-faceted, but a key mechanism is the frequent mobilization and redistribution of effector lymphocytes. Literally billions of lymphocytes are mobilized in response to just a single bout of exercise, particularly if the exercise is dynamic and taxes the cardiorespiratory system (e.g. running, cycling or rowing). Importantly, there is a catecholamine-mediated preferential mobilization of those lymphocyte subtypes that are capable of tissue migration, and their phenotypic signatures indicate they are primed and ‘looking for a fight’ (e.g. to recognize and kill virus-infected cells). Virus-specific memory T-cells mobilized with exercise exhibit enhanced proliferation responses to viral antigens such as those derived from CMV, EBV and HSV-1, and non-latent viruses such as adenovirus (Duggal et al., 2019). These mobilized cells firstly enter the blood compartment from marginated vascular pools, the spleen and the bone marrow before immediately trafficking to secondary lymphoid organs and tissues, particular to the lungs and the gut where increased immune defense may be required. This facilitates immune surveillance by increasing immune cell ‘patrolling’ in these vulnerable areas (e.g. the upper respiratory tract and the lungs) to prevent viruses and other pathogens from gaining a foothold. This process is also vital to minimize the impact of the virus and to expedite viral resolution should our immune barriers be breached and we become infected. Exercise also releases various cytokines from the skeletal muscle (i.e. myokines) that can help maintain immune competency. Muscle-derived IL-6 has been shown to direct immune cell trafficking towards areas of infection, while IL-7 can stimulate T-cell production from the thymus and IL-15 helps maintain T-cell and NK-cell homeostasis in the periphery, all of which work in concert to increase host immune defense (Duggal et al., 2019). To help boost immunity and mitigate the deleterious effects of inactivity and social isolation stress on our immune system, it is imperative that we strive to maintain recommended exercise levels during this COVID-19 pandemic. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommend 150–300 min of moderate to vigorous intensity cardiorespiratory physical activity per week and two sessions per week of muscle strength training (Piercy et al., 2018). While this can be challenging without access to gyms and parks and following social distancing and hygienic guidelines, there are many creative ways to stay active at home. The recent surge in home-based exercise platforms, such as online instructor-led classes and ‘exergaming’, will be particularly useful for some people during this time. However, specialized technology and equipment is not required; keeping active indoors or outdoors through brisk walking, stair climbing, yard/house work and/or playing active games with the family can be just as effective. What is important is that we avoid prolonged periods (>60-min) of time sitting and try to implement even a few minutes of activity at regular intervals throughout the day, all of which count toward achieving these weekly goals. Exceeding recommended physical activity levels during this time is not recommended as there is some evidence that excessive exercise (e.g. those activities performed by highly athletic individuals) might impair immunity and increase infection risk (Simpson et al., 2020). Exercise might not prevent us from developing COVID-19, but it is our perspective that physical activity will help maintain and counteract the negative effects of isolation and confinement stress on immune competency and should, therefore, be strongly promoted during this worldwide mitigation strategy. The available scientific evidence from other viral infections would indicate that physically active people will have less severe symptoms, shorter recovery times, and may be less likely to infect others they come into contact with. Exercise is also likely to be most beneficial for those who are asymptomatic or experiencing only mild symptoms. Exercise training has been shown to improve immune responses to both the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in older adults (Duggal et al., 2019), a particularly vulnerable population during this COVID-19 outbreak. This could be important to help our seniors develop better immunity to an anticipated COVID-19 vaccine and minimize future complications should a second wave of the virus occur. It is our expectation that a large body of research will follow this pandemic so that we may provide more specific exercise recommendations as they pertain to infection risk and control.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Exercise and the Regulation of Immune Functions.

Authors:  Richard J Simpson; Hawley Kunz; Nadia Agha; Rachel Graff
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 2.  Position statement. Part one: Immune function and exercise.

Authors:  Neil P Walsh; Michael Gleeson; Roy J Shephard; Maree Gleeson; Jeffrey A Woods; Nicolette C Bishop; Monika Fleshner; Charlotte Green; Bente K Pedersen; Laurie Hoffman-Goetz; Connie J Rogers; Hinnak Northoff; Asghar Abbasi; Perikles Simon
Journal:  Exerc Immunol Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.308

3.  Can exercise affect immune function to increase susceptibility to infection?

Authors:  Richard J Simpson; John P Campbell; Maree Gleeson; Karsten Krüger; David C Nieman; David B Pyne; James E Turner; Neil P Walsh
Journal:  Exerc Immunol Rev       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 6.308

Review 4.  Can physical activity ameliorate immunosenescence and thereby reduce age-related multi-morbidity?

Authors:  Niharika A Duggal; Grace Niemiro; Stephen D R Harridge; Richard J Simpson; Janet M Lord
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  Exercise and respiratory tract viral infections.

Authors:  Stephen A Martin; Brandt D Pence; Jeffrey A Woods
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.230

6.  Exercise as a countermeasure for latent viral reactivation during long duration space flight.

Authors:  Nadia H Agha; Satish K Mehta; Bridgette V Rooney; Mitzi S Laughlin; Melissa M Markofski; Duane L Pierson; Emmanuel Katsanis; Brian E Crucian; Richard J Simpson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

Authors:  Katrina L Piercy; Richard P Troiano; Rachel M Ballard; Susan A Carlson; Janet E Fulton; Deborah A Galuska; Stephanie M George; Richard D Olson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 157.335

  7 in total
  35 in total

1.  Why are COVID-19 effects less severe in Sub-Saharan Africa? Moving more and sitting less may be a primary reason.

Authors:  Lucy-Joy Wachira; Ross Arena; James F Sallis; Estelle V Lambert; Otieno Martin Ong'wen; Deepika R Laddu; Vincent Onywera; Adewale L Oyeyemi
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 11.278

2.  Stress-induced cognition among radiologic technologists in COVID-19 quarantine centres in Palestine.

Authors:  Omar Rimawi; Hussein ALMasri
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2021-03-29

Review 3.  Physical exercise as a tool to help the immune system against COVID-19: an integrative review of the current literature.

Authors:  Matheus Pelinski da Silveira; Kimberly Kamila da Silva Fagundes; Matheus Ribeiro Bizuti; Édina Starck; Renata Calciolari Rossi; Débora Tavares de Resende E Silva
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Do the benefits of exercise in indoor and outdoor environments during the COVID-19 pandemic outweigh the risks of infection?

Authors:  Fábio Hech Dominski; Ricardo Brandt
Journal:  Sport Sci Health       Date:  2020-07-17

5.  [Physical activity during the Covid-19 pandemic].

Authors:  J-F Kaux; M Francaux
Journal:  Sci Sports       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 0.789

6.  Restrictercise! Preferences Regarding Digital Home Training Programs during Confinements Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Lisa Mohr; Adam S Tenforde; Pascal Edouard; Chiara Fossati; Marcela González-Gross; Celso Sanchez Ramirez; Fernando Laiño; Benedict Tan; Julian David Pillay; Fabio Pigozzi; David Jimenez-Pavon; Bernhard Novak; David Url; Mandy Zhang; Mireille van Poppel; Christoph Heidt; Steffen Willwacher; Lutz Vogt; Evert Verhagen; Karsten Hollander; Luiz Hespanhol; Gustavo Yuki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  A quantitative and qualitative study on the neuropsychiatric sequelae of acutely ill COVID-19 inpatients in isolation facilities.

Authors:  Fengyi Hao; Wilson Tam; Xiaoyu Hu; Wanqiu Tan; Li Jiang; Xiaojiang Jiang; Ling Zhang; Xinling Zhao; Yiran Zou; Yirong Hu; Xi Luo; Roger S McIntyre; Travis Quek; Bach Xuan Tran; Zhisong Zhang; Hai Quang Pham; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Safety protocols in an exercise facility result in no detectable sars-CoV2 spread: A case study.

Authors:  Burak T Cilhoroz; Lara R DeRuisseau
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-07

Review 9.  Data mining and analysis of scientific research data records on Covid-19 mortality, immunity, and vaccine development - In the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Petar Radanliev; David De Roure; Rob Walton
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-07-04

10.  Mental health status and change in living rhythms among college students in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: A large-scale survey.

Authors:  Rong-Ning Chen; Shun-Wei Liang; Yang Peng; Xue-Guo Li; Jian-Bin Chen; Si-Yao Tang; Jing-Bo Zhao
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.