Alexander P Hawkins1,2, Andrea Zachariou1,2, Stewart F Parker2,3, Paul Collier4, Ian P Silverwood3, Russell F Howe5, David Lennon1,2. 1. School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Joseph Black Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K. 2. UK Catalysis Hub, Research Complex at Harwell, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxon OX11 0FA, U.K. 3. ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxon OX11 0QX, U.K. 4. Johnson Matthey Technology Centre, Blounts Court, Sonning Common, Reading RG4 9NH, U.K. 5. Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, U.K.
Abstract
The techniques of quasi-elastic and inelastic neutron scattering (QENS and INS) are applied to investigate the oligomerization of propene over a ZSM-5 zeolite. Investigations are performed at low temperatures, allowing identification of the onset of the oligomerization reaction and observation of the low-energy spectral changes due to intermediate formation that are difficult to observe by optical methods. Oligomerization proceeds via formation of a hydrogen-bonded precursor by an interaction of the propene with an internal acid site followed by protonation and chain growth with protonation being the rate-limiting step. The use of quasi-elastic neutron scattering to observe changes in system mobility with temperature via the elastic window scan technique allows identification of the active temperature range where catalyst activity commences and permits targeting of the more time-consuming INS investigations to conditions of interest. From examination of the product's spectrum, the structure of the resulting oligomer is deduced to be primarily linear.
The techniques of quasi-elastic and inelastic neutron scattering (QENS and INS) are applied to investigate the oligomerization of propene over a ZSM-5zeolite. Investigations are performed at low temperatures, allowing identification of the onset of the oligomerization reaction and observation of the low-energy spectral changes due to intermediate formation that are difficult to observe by optical methods. Oligomerization proceeds via formation of a hydrogen-bonded precursor by an interaction of the propene with an internal acid site followed by protonation and chain growth with protonation being the rate-limiting step. The use of quasi-elastic neutron scattering to observe changes in system mobility with temperature via the elastic window scan technique allows identification of the active temperature range where catalyst activity commences and permits targeting of the more time-consuming INS investigations to conditions of interest. From examination of the product's spectrum, the structure of the resulting oligomer is deduced to be primarily linear.
The solid acid oligomerization
of small olefin molecules by protonated
zeolite catalysts offers an effective industrial strategy for the
generation of C–C bonds and production of larger hydrocarbon
molecules.[1−5] As such it provides a route to the valorisation of light hydrocarbons
from nonfuel fractions in the petrochemical industry and for upgrading
biomass-derived oxygenates through the use of olefins as an intermediate.[4] In addition to these potential direct applications,
acid oligomerization is also a contributory reaction in several chemical
processes, which are important to the petrochemical industry. It contributes
to the formation and evolution of the “hydrocarbon pool”
in the methanol-to-hydrocarbon series of reactions,[6−8] and, as the
inverse reaction to the β-scission mechanism by which alkenes
are cracked in commercial fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) reactors,
it is therefore an important contributor to the final FCC product
stream.[9] In all of these processes, oligomerization
reactions occur in an equilibrium with isomerization and β-scission
reactions of the oligomerized product with the final product composition
being determined by reaction conditions and steric effects from the
zeolite pores. Generally, oligomerization and isomerization reactions
predominate at low temperatures, while cracking reactions are reported
to require temperatures higher than 693 K to make significant contributions
to the equilibrium,[10,11] Indeed, isomerizations are reported
to occur at temperatures as low as 293 K.[12−14] A full understanding
of the mechanisms of olefin oligomerization over zeolites is therefore
important to both improving reactions key to efficient utilization
of petrochemical reserves by conversion of both short- and long-chain-length
low-demand fractions and the development of non-fossil-fuel routes
to petrochemical derivatives.Neutron scattering techniques
offer the possibility of new insights
into the interaction of hydrocarbons with zeolite catalysts through
enabling a clearer observation of low-energy regions of the vibrational
energy spectrum. The exceptionally high inelastic incoherent scattering
cross section of hydrogen means that the spectra obtained by inelastic
neutron scattering (INS) spectrometers are dominated by the hydrocarbon
contributions and the zeolite lattice modes, which otherwise dominate
the infrared spectrum at energies below 1600 cm–1, do not significantly contribute. This allows access to the deformation
region of the hydrocarbon spectrum without interferences, providing
easier identification of intermediate hydrocarbon species. The further
ability of quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS) to observe energy
changes corresponding to molecular rotations and translations also
offers the ability to quantify hydrocarbon mobility changes due to
oligomerization. The time and length scales accessible by QENS closely
match those associated with confined hydrocarbon diffusion in zeolites,[15] and they have been previously used to identify
transition temperatures associated with such factors as antifreeze
effects in water–sugar mixtures.[16]We have previously utilized these advantages to study (i)
the linear
product of the oligomerization of 1-octene in ZSM-5[13] and, in a preliminary study, (ii) the oligomerization of
propene within ZSM-5.[14] The latter study
proposed a linear reaction mechanism for the oligomerization and showed
that it was possible to adsorb the propene into the ZSM-5 pore structure
without triggering oligomerization provided that propene loading was
performed at sufficiently low temperatures.[14] This scenario offers the possibility of observing the oligomerization
reaction in progress by loading the propene below its reaction temperature
and subsequently observing the reaction by neutron methods as it occurs
in situ. This paper reports the use of INS and QENS techniques to
observe the oligomerization reaction of propene in progress and the
direct observation of intermediate species. Thus, this heightened
awareness of light olefin interactions over ZSM-5 connects with contemporary
hydrocarbon refining practices.
Results and Discussion
Previous studies of the interactions of propene in ZSM-5 have shown
that the adsorbed propene undergoes rapid oligomerization to generate
long-chain alkane species at temperatures as low as 293 K, while this
reaction does not occur at cryogenic temperatures.[14] Since this reaction involves the formation of larger molecules,
it results in a reduction in the overall mobility of the ZSM-5/hydrocarbon
system since the large oligomer molecules are not able to diffuse
freely through the zeolite pores. It is therefore possible to quantify
the progression of the reaction with temperature by means of quasi-elastic
neutron scattering (QENS), which provides information on the motions
of molecules with the degree of mobility determining the extent of
broadening of the QENS peak.[17] Summing
the collected neutron scattering intensity across the full range of
scattering angles (Q) and integrating the resulting
peak across an energy transfer range of ±25 μeV produces
an estimate of the elastic intensity at each temperature. Normalizing
these values against the value recorded at the base temperature produces
a plot of relative elastic intensity against temperature, referred
to as an “elastic window scan”. Since elastic intensity
embodies the contributions of the immobile proportion of the sample
only, it follows that the value of this plot is inversely proportional
to overall sample mobility. As the sample temperature increases, the
relative elastic intensity will decrease as the propene molecules
become more mobile, as shown in Figure . The oligomerization reaction will reverse this trend
as the small propene molecules are converted to less mobile long-chain
species. Once the oligomerization has run to completion, the downward
trend in elastic intensity with temperature will resume as the final
product mixture moves more with increased thermal energy. Due to utilizing
the sum of the elastic intensity across all Q values,
a spectrum suitable for generating an elastic window scan data point
can be collected in a much shorter time period than required for an
INS spectrum.
Figure 1
Quasielastic scattering functions for propene in ZSM-5
at (a) 20,
(b) 120, and (c) 220 K showing increasing temperature leading to decreased
intensity within the bounds of the elastic scattering energy transfer
range, defined by the resolution limit of OSIRIS (*), indicative of
higher sample mobility.
Quasielastic scattering functions for propene in ZSM-5
at (a) 20,
(b) 120, and (c) 220 K showing increasing temperature leading to decreased
intensity within the bounds of the elastic scattering energy transfer
range, defined by the resolution limit of OSIRIS (*), indicative of
higher sample mobility.An elastic window scan
for the propene/ZSM-5 system from 20 to
300 K is presented in Figure and shows the expected elastic intensity profile, allowing
the identification of the minimum temperature for the oligomerization
reaction to occur being at 225 K. The decrease in mobility due to
oligomerization is not instantaneous but occurs over a range of temperatures
from 225 to 270 K in contrast to rapid oligomerization, which was
noted to occur when the loading took place above this range. This
indicates that the reaction is only partially complete in this range
of temperatures and defines the temperature range of interest for
the more detailed investigation by INS, which was carried out on TOSCA.
Figure 2
Relative
elastic intensity vs temperature for propene in ZSM-5
from 20 to 300 K. Intensity values normalized against T = 20 K.
Relative
elastic intensity vs temperature for propene in ZSM-5
from 20 to 300 K. Intensity values normalized against T = 20 K.With the temperature range where
oligomerization begins identified
by means of the QENS data, the INS spectra collected across this region
allows more detailed investigation of the oligomerization reaction
mechanism. Figure shows the start (140 K, (b)) and end (293 K, (c)) state spectra
of the sample compared to reference spectra of the empty zeolite and
pure propene. The 140 K spectrum shows all the modes that are observed
in the spectrum of pure propene, confirming that the adsorbed propene
has not reacted when introduced at this temperature. The major difference
observed is the splitting of the =C–CH3 torsion
mode from a single peak at 221 cm–1 to a complex
feature with peaks at 200, 216, and 230 cm–1. From
the three peaks in the 140 K spectrum, we can deduce that the propene
is present in multiple environments in this sample, potentially representing
internally and externally adsorbed propene. Above 250 cm–1 differences between the free and 140 K adsorbed propene spectra
are minor, consisting of some broadening of the peaks, potentially
due to propene–zeolite interactions, a higher level of background
intensity due to the essentially flat contribution of the zeolite
in the 400–2000 cm–1 region, and suppression
of the phonon wing (combinations between internal modes and the external
density of states) modes, which are visible at 287, 496, and 652 cm–1 in the pure propene spectrum. The assignment of the
modes in the propene and 140 K spectra is given in Table and corresponds to the results
previously reported.[14] In addition to the
methyl torsion, modes of particular importance are the vinyl scissors
mode at 429 cm–1 and vinyl torsion at 584 cm–1.
Figure 3
INS spectra of propene adsorbed in ZSM-5 at (b) 140 and
(c) 293
K compared to reference spectra of (d) pure propene and (a) the unloaded
zeolite. Spectra recorded on TOSCA, scaled to the quantity of propene
in each sample and offset in the y axis for clarity.
Marked peaks: (†) = methyl torsion, (‡) = vinyl torsion,
and (*) = phonon wing modes.
Table 1
Peak Assignments for the TOSCA INS
Spectrum of Propene Shown in Figure and the Corresponding Peaks in the Combined 140 K
ZSM-5 + Propene Spectrum (Assignments Based on Previously Reported
Investigations of Propene[14,18,19])
wavenumber (cm–1)
assignment
221
—CH3 torsion
287
wing mode of the 221 cm–1 peak
429
C=C—C scissors
496
wing mode of the 429 cm–1 peak
584
C=CH2 torsion
652
wing mode
of the 584 cm–1 peak
915
C=CH2 out-of-plane rock
929
C=CH2 out-of-plane rock
1002
C—H out-of-plane rock
1048
—CH3 out-of-plane
rock
1169
—CH3 in-plane rock
1291
C—H
in-plane rock
1371
—CH3 symmetric deformation
1440
=CH2 scissors
1500
—CH3 asymmetric deformation
INS spectra of propene adsorbed in ZSM-5 at (b) 140 and
(c) 293
K compared to reference spectra of (d) pure propene and (a) the unloaded
zeolite. Spectra recorded on TOSCA, scaled to the quantity of propene
in each sample and offset in the y axis for clarity.
Marked peaks: (†) = methyl torsion, (‡) = vinyl torsion,
and (*) = phonon wing modes.The spectrum of the sample
adsorbed at 293 K shows clear evidence
of the oligomerization reaction with the absence of any vinyl modes
indicating that the reaction has proceeded to completion at this temperature,
as predicted by the QENS results (Figure ). Examination of the infrared spectrum of
the ZSM-5/propene system, available as Figure S1 in the Supporting Information to this paper, confirms this
with the reduction in the intensity of the zeolite ν(O–H)
mode at 3610 cm–1 indicating the consumption of
Brønsted acid sites, while the fact that all ν(C–H)
modes are located below 3000 cm–1 indicates that
the oligomer is fully saturated. An interference from the zeolite
framework bands means that no hydrocarbon modes below 2700 cm–1 are resolvable in the infrared spectrum even if the
zeolite contributions are subtracted from the loaded spectrum, meaning
that direct comparison of infrared data with the modes detected by
INS is not possible.Studies of the room-temperature oligomerization
of propene over
ZSM-5 in the literature generally report the product oligomer being
a zeolite-bonded alkoxide molecule with one methyl side chain per
incorporated propene molecule, analogous to atactic polypropene.[5,12] The production of more linear alkoxides in the C12 length
range is also reported.[19] However, neither
of these possibilities provides a good match for the end-state oligomer
spectrum in this case. As shown in Figure , comparison of the 293 K reacted sample
with experimental reference spectra of various polypropene tacticities
provides a poor match due to the reference spectra’s limited
number of methylene modes, while dodecane exhibits insufficient peak
broadening and low intensity of the CH2 wag mode located
at 1370 cm–1. The ZSM-5/propene 293 K experimental
spectrum also lacks modes that can be attributed to −CH–
groups or side chains. The spectra of polyethylene and long-chain
alkanes (of which C44H90 is included as a representative
sample) provide a much closer match, indicating that the oligomerization
reaction has been limited to a linear end-to-end mechanism by the
zeolite pore structure, resulting in a primarily linear product mixture.
Our previous studies into propene oligomerization have attributed
the predominance of linear oligomers to the majority of reactions
occurring at interior acid sites[14] with
the side branches being incorporated into the chain backbone prior
to further oligomerization of the adsorbed alkoxide. Such primarily
linear products have previously been observed using NMR by van den
Berg and co-workers at 300 K[20] and by Chen
and Bridger at higher temperatures up to 503 K in ZSM-5 samples where
the surface acid sites have been selectively deactivated;[21] they propose a 1,2-hydride shift mechanism,
which positions the cationic charge adjacent to the methyl branch,
allowing its incorporation into the chain backbone through a protonated
cyclopropyl intermediate with both reactions being driven by the greater
heat of adsorption of linear chains in the ZSM-5 pores. Hydride shifts
of this form are known to contribute to the rearrangement of long
aliphatic carbocations,[22] and this process
is felt to provide an indirect explanation for the linearization of
the oligomer shown by the experimental data (Figure ). It is interesting to note that the highest
temperatures where linear oligomerization has been observed are greater
than the temperature found to generate primarily branched oligomers
in the infrared investigations of Spoto et al.,[12] indicating that the geometry of the final oligomers is
not simply a low-temperature effect but may be related to, among other
things, differences in the zeolite crystallite size.[14] Relative peak heights in the experimental oligomer spectrum
do not precisely match those found in any of the reference linear
alkanes; thus, the final product mixture likely consists of a mixture
of alkoxide species with multiple chain lengths. Modes that are present
in both the adsorbed propene spectrum and linear reference spectra
exhibit an ∼5 cm–1 shift to higher energies,
which is attributed to the fact that the reference compounds were
recorded as bulk solid samples.
Figure 4
INS spectrum of propene adsorbed in ZSM-5
at 293 K (f) compared
to possible oligomer reference spectra sourced from the ISIS INS database:
(a) polyethylene, (b) atactic polypropylene, (c) isotactic polypropylene,
(d) C12H26, and (e) C44H90.[23] All spectra are recorded on TOSCA.
The locations of the CH2 in-phase rock (†) and CH2 wag (‡) modes in the adsorbed spectrum are highlighted.
INS spectrum of propene adsorbed in ZSM-5
at 293 K (f) compared
to possible oligomer reference spectra sourced from the ISIS INS database:
(a) polyethylene, (b) atactic polypropylene, (c) isotactic polypropylene,
(d) C12H26, and (e) C44H90.[23] All spectra are recorded on TOSCA.
The locations of the CH2 in-phase rock (†) and CH2 wag (‡) modes in the adsorbed spectrum are highlighted.The sequential heating of the sample loaded at
140 K to temperatures
in the 200–273 K region provides further information on the
mechanism by which the oligomerization reaction progresses. Regions
of interest in the INS spectra of the sample recorded after heating
to each temperature are shown in Figure ; the full INS spectrum from 0 to 1600 cm–1 is available as Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. The high resolution of TOSCA at these
energies allows the observation of small changes in the spectra due
to intermediate formation. After heating the sample to 200 K, some
changes are visible despite the QENS data suggesting that this temperature
lies below the point at which significant changes in sample mobility
start to occur. The most notable change is the splitting of the 585
cm–1 peak, corresponding to the twisting motion
of the propene C=C bond into a pair of peaks at 581 and 600
cm–1. This is attributed to the formation of an
intermediate consisting of a propenehydrogen-bonded to a Brønsted
acid site with this intermediate being responsible for the higher
energy peak in the doublet and the remaining physisorbed propene being
responsible for the 581 cm–1 signal. The formation
of such hydrogen-bonded intermediates as the first step in the oligomerization
reactions of light olefins over acid zeolites is reported in the literature.[12,24−26] Although the H-bonded transition states are only
observed experimentally in these reactions at low temperatures, this
is regarded as a spectroscopic limitation due to their transient nature
at higher temperatures. Computational studies confirm that H-bonded
π complexes remain a necessary first intermediate in the oligomerization
reaction mechanism at temperatures closer to industrial conditions.[27]
Figure 5
Selected regions of the TOSCA INS spectra of propene after
absorption
into ZSM-5 at (a) 140 K then following further heating to the indicated
temperatures: (b) 200 K, (c) 215 K, (d) 225 K, (e) 240 K, (f) 255
K, (g) 270 K, and (h) 293 K. Spectra are offset in the y axis for clarity. The positions of (*) the methyl torsion, (§)
vinyl scissors, and (†, ‡) unbonded and bonded vinyl
torsions in the 200 K spectrum are highlighted.
Selected regions of the TOSCA INS spectra of propene after
absorption
into ZSM-5 at (a) 140 K then following further heating to the indicated
temperatures: (b) 200 K, (c) 215 K, (d) 225 K, (e) 240 K, (f) 255
K, (g) 270 K, and (h) 293 K. Spectra are offset in the y axis for clarity. The positions of (*) the methyl torsion, (§)
vinyl scissors, and (†, ‡) unbonded and bonded vinyl
torsions in the 200 K spectrum are highlighted.An increase in the overall spectral intensity relative to the spectrum
at 140 K is also observed, consistent with an increase in the amount
of hydrogen nuclei in the neutron beam. Since the sample cell at this
point in the experiment is a closed system, the most likely source
of the additional hydrogens is from the adsorption of propene previously
located in the headspace of the sample cell into the zeolite. No further
intensity increases relative to the 200 K spectrum are observed for
the following temperature points indicating that all the propene is
adsorbed at 200 K and above. Further evidence for this is provided
by the shift of all the methyl torsion intensity into the peak at
200 cm–1, indicating that all the propene present
is now in the same external environment and the 200 cm–1 peak in the 140 K spectrum represents the fraction of the propene
that is within the zeolite pore network at that temperature. Since
neither the methyl torsion nor the vinyl=CH2 scissors
modes are split in the same fashion as that of the C=C torsion,
the hydrogen bonding in the intermediate does not appear to be strong
enough to affect modes that do not involve the C=C bond itself.Further heating to 215 and 225 K does not result in significant
changes, although some transfer of intensity occurs between the 581
and 600 cm–1 peaks, indicating a slight increase
in the proportion of hydrogen-bonded propene and confirming this entity
to be the intermediate responsible for the higher energy peak. Reaching
240 K results in new changes, namely, a reduction in the intensity
of peaks associated with the vinyl group, most clearly observable
with the vinyl scissors mode at 430 cm–1, and the
shifting of some of the intensity in the methyl torsion peak to a
higher value (235 cm–1) consistent with the change
in internal effects on the transition energy from being part of a
longer chain length. At 255 K, a broad oligomer longitudinal acoustic
mode (LAM) becomes visible above the level of background noise at
155 cm–1.Figure presents
INS difference spectra obtained by subtracting the spectrum obtained
after treatment at 200 K from the 240–293 K datasets that renders
these changes more apparent. The spectra indicate the initiation of
a further reaction step, which consumes the C=C bond and confirms
that the oligomerization reaction begins at 240 K, as indicated by
the QENS results. Continued heating results in a decrease of vinyl
mode intensity. The growth of peaks in the methylene region of the
spectrum is also apparent, which are clearly visible in the difference
spectra from 255 K upward until the final spectrum is achieved at
293 K. Some propene molecules remain to contribute to the spectrum
at temperatures as high as 270 K, although at this temperature, the
581 cm–1 vinyl peak has been completely suppressed,
so the propene is purely present in the hydrogen-bonded intermediate
form.
Figure 6
Difference plots of selected spectra from Figure relative to the spectrum at (a) 200 K: (b)
240 K, (c) 255 K, (d) 270 K, and (e) = 293 K. All spectra are reproduced
at the same scale.
Difference plots of selected spectra from Figure relative to the spectrum at (a) 200 K: (b)
240 K, (c) 255 K, (d) 270 K, and (e) = 293 K. All spectra are reproduced
at the same scale.Taken together, these
results can be interpreted as signifying
that the oligomerization reaction proceeds via a three-step mechanism
as illustrated in Scheme : (i) initial formation of an olefinhydrogen-bonded to an
acid site as an intermediate (as signified by the C=CH2 torsion at 600 cm–1) followed by (ii) protonation
of the bonded olefin to form a carbocation and (iii) subsequent oligomerization
through the hydride-shift mechanism previously discussed to give a
primarily linear product. This is in agreement with previous studies
into olefin oligomerization over zeolites,[20,21] while the large temperature range from 200 to 240 K where the hydrogen-bonded
intermediate is stable is consistent with the report that it is the
olefin protonation that forms the rate-limiting step in olefin oligomerizations.[9,12] Although step ii of the reaction is observed to commence at a temperature
close to the boiling point of free propene (225 K), this is believed
to be a coincidence; other studies of low-temperature propene oligomerization
over H-mordenite report temperatures for the initiation of this phase
of the reaction, which are lower by over 40 K, indicating that oligomerization
can take place well below the free propene boiling point.[24] Examination of the shape of the positive peaks
in the difference spectra indicates that the reacted oligomers exhibit
the broadened shape characteristic of the final long-chain alkane
product mixture (e.g., Figure c) even at the lowest temperature where a reaction occurs
(Figure b,c). Combined
with the continued presence of propene molecules up to 270 K, it can
be deduced that the propene oligomerization reaction is extremely
slow at temperatures below 270 K but the reaction proceeds to yield
alkoxide oligomers in the same range of final chain lengths regardless
of temperature.
Scheme 1
Three-Step Mechanism for Oligomerization of Propene
over H-ZSM-5
(Adapted from Ref (19))
This hypothesis is consistent
with the fact that kinetic studies
of alkene oligomerization report carbocation chain length as not having
a noticeable effect on the activation energy required for the further
addition of an additional alkene onto the carbocation chain.[9] The system being in an equilibrium that shifts
with increasing temperature is not a suitable explanation since β-scission
reactions are universally reported to become more significant with
increasing temperature, which would result in a decrease in average
chain length.[4,12] Systems where β scission
is a significant contributor are also reported to result in a product
stream, which is primarily olefinic in character at temperatures lower
than 500 K.[26] Since neither of these observations
is the case for this system, it can be concluded that, for this catalyst,
cracking reactions do not make a significant contribution in the temperature
range investigated and the intermediate character of the hydrocarbon–zeolite
system in the 225–270 K temperature range is purely due to
slow kinetics of the oligomerization reaction at these temperatures.
Since the length of the oligomer chains is not temperature-dependent,
it is most likely determined by steric effects from the zeolite pores.
As previously noted, from the fact that the ratio of peak heights
in the final spectrum does not exactly match any available model compound
spectrum for linear alkanes, it can be concluded that multiple alkoxide
chain lengths are present. While it is possible to obtain an estimate
of the average straight chain length in bulk or aqueous linear oligomers
from the energy of the longitudinal acoustic mode peak,[28−30] the unknown nature of the effect zeolite–oligomer interactions
has on the positioning of the LAM precludes the application of this
technique in this case.
Conclusions
These results indicate
that propene oligomerization in ZSM-5 zeolites
can occur at temperatures as low as 225 K, although oligomer formation
only becomes large enough to significantly impact the INS spectrum
at temperatures of 240 K and above; preliminary hydrogen bonding of
adsorbed propene can occur down to ca. 200 K. Below this temperature
the liquid propene is adsorbed into the zeolite without undergoing
chemical changes. At temperatures high enough to initiate a reaction,
the oligomerization reaction requires the formation of a hydrogen-bonded
olefin-acid intermediate as a first step, and it then proceeds via
protonation of the bonded olefin to form a carbocation and subsequent
C–C bond formation with further propene molecules, which are
free in the zeolite pores. The protonation of the H-bonded propene
is thought to be the rate-limiting step, and once a carbocation is
formed, subsequent chain growth is too rapid to be observed in progress
with the ultimate chain termination length believed to be dictated
by pore steric effects to generate a bonded alkoxide in the long oligomer/short
polymer length scale. At low temperatures, the rate-limiting step
proceeds slowly so that considerable populations of unreacted propene
are still observed up to 270 K. Full conversion of the propene is
complete by 293 K resulting in a primarily linear mixture of products.
Experimental
Methods
The ZSM-5zeolite used was a powder form supplied
by Johnson Matthey
and calcined in air for 12 h at 773 K to remove the residual synthesis
template. Characterization of the catalyst showed it to possess a
Si:Al ratio of 30:1, established by SS-NMR, and a BET surface area
of 370 m2/g.Pretreatment of the zeolite to remove
adsorbed water was carried
out using a catalyst preparation gas-handling rig located at the ISIS
facility: technical details of this apparatus have been previously
published.[31] Fifteen-gram batches of the
calcined zeolite were loaded into a cylindrical steel cell equipped
with gas-handling fittings, mounted on the preparation rig, heated
to 623 K under flowing helium (0.15 slpm, CK gas, >99.999%) at
10
K/min, and held for 3 h to remove adsorbed water from the zeolite.
The dried catalyst was cooled to ambient temperature, and the reactor
is isolated for moving to an argon-filled glovebox (MBraun UniLab
MB-20-G, [H2O] < 1 ppm, [O2] < 1 ppm)
where the catalyst was transferred to the experimental environments.For QENS analysis, 2.5 g of the pretreated zeolite was loaded into
an aluminum QENS sample cell with a 2 mm annular spacing and equipped
with a single gas inlet port and indium wire gaskets. This cell design
is equipped with top- and bottom-mounted copper blocks containing
thermocouples and thermal resistance heaters to allow control of the
cell temperature: cooling during neutron data collection is provided
by the closed-cycle refrigerator (CCR), which forms part of the spectrometer
sample environment. The sample was mounted on a gas-handling center
stick and cooled to 200 K using dry ice, and the gas lines to the
cell were kept at 293 K to prevent premature condensation of the propene.
A container of a known volume was charged with 3.9 × 10–2 mol of propene, equating to 7 molecules of propene/zeolite unit
cell using a gas handling rig. This was connected to the sample cell,
and the propene was allowed to condense into the interior from the
top down. The cell was left at 200 K for 30 min to allow the propene
to diffuse through the zeolite as a liquid. This procedure has been
previously shown to allow the introduction of the propene to the zeolite
while preventing any oligomerization reactions from occurring.[14]Measurement of the QENS spectra was performed
using OSIRIS, a near-backscattering
indirect geometry neutron spectrometer at the ISIS Neutron and Muon
Source, which is optimized for measurements in the quasi-elastic region.
The (PG002) reflection from the graphite analyzer crystals was used
in all cases, which defined the energy resolution of 25.4 μeV
and an accessible momentum transfer range of 0.18–1.8 Å–1.[32] The propene-loaded
sample was inserted into OSIRIS and cooled from the dosing temperature
to base temperature (20 K). A series of 50 μA·h QENS spectra
were taken at 5 K intervals from the base temperature to 300 K. The
measurement time at each temperature was approximately 20 min, allowing
ample time for reactions to reach a stable state.For INS analysis,
two samples of the pretreated zeolite were loaded
into aluminum gas-handling sample cells. This cell design has an in-beam
geometry consisting of a 50 × 50 × 10 mm flat plate and
is equipped with indium wire gaskets, gas ports, and thermocouple/heater
pairs at the top and bottom of the cell. When inserted in the INS
spectrometer sample environment, the pipe to the lower gas port is
positioned on the side of the sample oriented away from the neutron
detector bank to prevent interference with the recorded spectrum.
Measurements were performed on the ISIS facility’s indirect
geometry spectrometer TOSCA. Compared to the direct geometry instrument
used for the preliminary investigations previously reported,[14] TOSCA offers inferior resolution at high energy
transfer values but superior resolution in the 200–1600 cm–1 region where changes due to intermediate formation
are most likely to occur.[33]The first
sample was used to prepare a sample of oligomerized propene
loaded at room temperature for comparison with the results previously
reported.[14] The sample was mounted on a
gas-handling center stick, inserted in TOSCA, and cooled to base temperature
(<25 K) for collection of a spectrum of the empty zeolite to allow
subtraction of the zeolite contributions in later analysis. The sample
was then removed and allowed to return to 293 K. A buffer volume was
charged with 2.51 × 10–2 mol of propene, equating
to a loading level of 12.27 propene molecules/zeolite unit cell calculated
from the 11.80 g dry mass of the zeolite, and used to introduce the
propene to the cell through the top-mounted pipe connection. Thirty
minutes was allowed for the reaction to proceed to completion followed
by insertion into the TOSCA spectrometer, cooling to base temperature,
and collection of the spectrum of the fully oligomerized sample.The second sample of 10.5 g of dry zeolite was used to investigate
the unreacted propene and the reaction in progress. A background scan
of the empty zeolite was collected in the same manner as that of sample
1 followed by dosing of the propene as a liquid. Due to the greater
mass of zeolite and larger cell involved in these measurements, the
decision was made to perform the dosing at lower temperatures than
used for the QENS measurement to prevent the possibility of some oligomerization
occurring due to improperly cooled hot spots in the catalyst bed.
The cell was removed, and the gas lines were warmed to 293 K to prevent
propene condensation, while the zeolite sample was maintained at 77
K by immersion of the sample cell in liquid nitrogen up to the level
of the top of the catalyst bed. Propene was introduced into the cell
through the top port connection using the same method as before with
a buffer volume charge in this instance of 1.29 × 10–2 mol of propene, equating to a loading level of 6.97 propene molecules/zeolite
unit cell. The sample was left in this condition to ensure all the
available propene condensed into the sample-containing portion of
the cell to prevent blocking of the inlet port by frozen propene:
after 30 min, the whole can was immersed in liquid nitrogen to cool
to 77 K in order to prevent any possibility of the cell temperature
rising above the target diffusion temperature during thermal equilibration
with the TOSCA sample environment. The loaded sample was returned
to the TOSCA spectrometer and heated to 140 K using the cell-mounted
heaters to melt the propene and allow it to diffuse through the sample
as a liquid; 60 min was allocated for this process, and after which,
the sample was cooled back to the base temperature, and a spectrum
of the loaded sample was recorded.Following collection of the
unreacted propene/ZSM-5 spectrum, additional
spectra were collected with the same sample following heating to a
series of temperatures from 200 to 270 K. For each point, the sample
cell was heated to the target temperature inside the TOSCA sample
environment using the cell’s integrated heaters. The sample
was held at this temperature for 30 min to ensure an equilibrium temperature
across the full depth of the catalyst and to allow any reactions to
occur; it was then returned to base temperature for spectrum collection.
Spectra were recorded at 200, 215, 225, 240, 255, and 270 K with values
chosen by reference to the results of the QENS investigation. Following
completion of this test sequence, the sample cell was removed from
TOSCA, allowed to stand at 293 K overnight, and then returned to collect
an end-state spectrum of the fully oligomerized sample. Finally, a
spectrum of 4.076 × 10–2 mol of pure propene
was collected for comparison purposes.All data analysis tasks,
including conversion of neutron time-of-flight
data to energy transfer values and data binning to generate the spectra
presented, were performed using the Mantid software package.[34]In order to examine higher-energy regions
of the vibrational spectrum
in greater detail, a further sample of the zeolite was analyzed by
diffuse-reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS)
using an Agilent Carey 680 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a Harrick
praying mantis beam accessory and heated sample cell with gas-flow
capability. Spectra were collected from 4000 to 700 cm–1 using a liquid nitrogen-cooled MCT detector with a resolution of
4 cm–1 and averaged over 64 scans/spectrum. The
zeolite was heated to 423 K at 5 K/min while purging with helium (25
mL/min) and held for 30 min to remove adsorbed water. The sample was
cooled back to 293 K under continued flow, and a spectrum of the unloaded
zeolite was collected. A 3 mL/min flow of propene was then introduced
to the helium flow and passed through the sample for 1 min. The sample
was purged for 5 min to remove residual gaseous propene from the headspace
of the sample cell followed by collection of the oligomerized propene/ZSM-5
spectrum.
Authors: Mark T F Telling; Stuart I Campbell; Dennis Engberg; David Martín y Marero; Ken H Andersen Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2005-03-21 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Alexander P Hawkins; Andrea Zachariou; Stewart F Parker; Paul Collier; Nathan Barrow; Ian P Silverwood; Russell F Howe; David Lennon Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 4.036