| Literature DB >> 32309635 |
Thenmozhi Sukumar1, Jeslin Varghese1, Kiran S1, Suja Bhargavan1, Parvathy Jayasree1, Vemparthan Suvekbala1, Kumaran Alaganandam1, Lakshminarayanan Ragupathy1.
Abstract
Graphene family materials (GFMs) are extensively explored for various biomedical applications due to their unique physical properties. The prime challenge is to establish a conclusive safety profile of these nanomaterials and their respective products or devices. Formulating GFMs with appropriate ingredients (e.g., surfactant/compatibilizer) will help to disperse them homogeneously (i.e., within the polymer matrix in the case of polymer-graphene nanocomposites) and aid in good interfacial interaction to achieve the desired properties. However, no cytotoxicity report is available on the effects of the additives on graphene and its incorporated materials. Here, we report in vitro cytotoxicity of formulated FLG (FLG-C), i.e., a mixture of FLG, melamine, and sodium poly(naphthalene sulfonate) (SPS), along with natural rubber (NR) latex and FLG-C-included NR latex nanocomposite (FLG-C-NR) thin films on human vaginal epithelial (HVE) cells. FLG-C shows reduced cellular proliferation (∼55%) only at a longer exposure time (72 h) even at a low concentration (50 μg/mL). It also displays significant down- and upregulation in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), respectively, whereas no changes are observed in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), propidium iodide (PI), uptake, and cell cycle analysis at 48 h. In vitro experiments on NR latex and FLG-C-NR latex thin films demonstrate that the incorporation of FLG-C does not compromise the biocompatibility of the NR latex. Further substantiation from the in vivo experiments on the thin films recommends that FLG-C could be suitable to prepare a range of biocompatible rubber latex nanocomposites-based products, viz., next-generation condoms (male and female), surgical gloves, catheters, vaginal rings, bladder-rectum spacer balloon, etc.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32309635 PMCID: PMC7157971 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng ISSN: 2373-9878
Figure 1(a) TGA of FLG-C, NR latex, and FLG-C-NR latex thin films; (b) TEM image of FLG-C dispersed in deionized water with selected area diffraction (SAED) pattern of edge of graphene flakes; (c) TEM image of FLG-C dispersed in cell culture media with SAED; and (d) Raman image of FLG-C-NR latex thin film generating the marker peak using 1580 cm–1, and the image background is made transparent to show the underlying white light image of the sample. It should be noted that not all the white light textures correspond to the Raman chemical image of the multilayer graphene.
Viral Penetration Study of FLG-C-NR/NR Latex Condoms
| s. no. | condom thickness (μm) | types of condoms | quantity of ϕX174 passed (μL) | burst pressure (L) | burst volume (kPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 | FLG-C-NR latex condoms | 634 ± 383 | 44 | 1.6 |
| 2 | 75 | NR latex condoms | 922 ± 16 | 39 | 1.3 |
| 3 | 125 | condoms purchased from the market | 800 ± 41 |
Figure 2(A) Optical images (10× scale, 2 μm) and (B) cell proliferation (by MTT assay) of HVE cells after treatment with FLG-C (FLG), NR latex thin film, and FLG-C-NR latex thin film. The arrows indicate the presence of FLG.
Figure 3LDH release after treatment with (a) FLG-C (p < 0.5), (b) NR latex thin film (p < 0.2), and (c) FLG-C-NR latex thin film (p < 0.5) in 24, 48, and 72 h.
Figure 4(a) MMP (p < 0.027)/ROS (p < 0.22), (b) PI uptake (p < 0.15), and (c) cell cycle analysis (p < 0.5) of HVE cells after treatment (48 h) with representative concentrations of FLG-C and extracts of NR latex and FLG-C-NR thin films.
Comparison between Reported Works on Toxicity of FLG and the Current Work
| in vitro cytotoxicity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLG or GO | production method or purchased sample | cell line and assays | dose (μg/mL) and exposure time | Is product fabricated and tested? | ref | |
| FLG | ball milling | 0.2 | HaCat and WST-8, SRB, PI staining | 0.005–90 (FLG)/0.005– 100 (GO1-3) and 24/48/72 h and 10 days | no | ( |
| GO1-3 | purchased | broad | ||||
| FLG | ball milling | 0.35 | HaCaT and NMR-based metabolomics, cell apoptosis, necrosis, and viability and determination of O2•–, H2O2, and Ca2+ | 0.5–200 and 24/48 h and 7 days. | no | ( |
| GO | purchased | 0.94 | ||||
| FLG | ball milling | 0.4 | HaCaT MMP, ROS, and cell viability | 1–100 and 24/72 h | no | ( |
| GO | purchased | <1 | ||||
| FLG | arc discharge | − | human primary endothelial cells | 0–10 and 24 h | no | ( |
| FLG | purchased | 0.51 | RAW 264.7 | 2.5–40 and 24 h | no | ( |
| FLG-C | ball milling | 0.41–0.49 | HVE and HeLA cells and MTT, MMP, ROS, LDH, annexin staining, and cell cycle analysis | 0–1000 and 24/48/72 h | yes | current work |
| NR latex | dip molding | − | the same above in vitro in HVE and HeLA cells plus in vivo investigations | 0 to undiluted to 1:16 dilution | yes | current work |
| FLG-C-NR latex | dip molding | − | the same above in vitro and in vivo experiments | 0 to undiluted to 1:16 dilution | yes | current work |
Clinical Observation of the Animals Treated with NR Latex and FLG-C-NR Latex Thin Films in Acute Systemic Toxicitya
M—male; F—female; G1 and G3—physiological saline and sesame oil control; and G2 and G4—physiological saline and sesame oil extract of the samples.
Grading of Skin Sensitization Reaction on Guinea Pigs after Removal of the Challenge Patcha
| Magnusson
and Kligman scale | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | ||||||
| sample | group | sex | animal no. | C | T | C | T |
| NR latex thin film | G1 | M | 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G2 | M | 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G3 | M | 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G4 | M | 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| FLG-C-NR latex thin film | G1 | F | 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G2 | F | 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G3 | F | 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G4 | F | 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
M—male; F—female; G1 and G3—physiological saline and sesame oil control; and G2 and G4—physiological saline and sesame oil extract of the samples. C and T are the control and test sites, respectively.
Gross Pathology Examination of Penile Tissue Reactions with the Thin Film Extracts
| group | animal no. | macroscopic evaluation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NR latex thin film | G1 | 1, 2, and 3 | no abnormality was detected |
| G2 | 4, 5, and 6 | ||
| G3 | 7, 8, and 9 | ||
| G4 | 10, 11, and 12 | ||
| FLG-C-NR latex thin film | G1 | 1, 2, and 3 | no abnormality was detected |
| G2 | 4, 5, and 6 | ||
| G3 | 7, 8, and 9 | ||
| G4 | 10, 11, and 12 |
Figure 5Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathology images of penile tissues of New Zealand white rabbits.
Gross Pathology Examination of Vaginal Tissue Reactions
| sample | group | animal no. | macroscopic evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| NR latex thin film | G1 | 1, 2, and 3 | no abnormality was detected |
| G2 | 4, 5, and 6 | ||
| G3 | 7, 8, and 9 | ||
| G4 | 10, 11, and 12 | ||
| FLG-C-NR latex thin film | G1 | 1, 2, and 3 | no abnormality was detected |
| G2 | 4, 5, and 6 | ||
| G3 | 7, 8, and 9 | ||
| G4 | 10, 11, and 12 |
Figure 6Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathology images of vaginal tissues of New Zealand white Rabbits.