| Literature DB >> 32309445 |
Hong-Li Guo1,2, Shuo Zhang3, Christopher North4, Min Zhang1,5, Xiao-Xia Meng1,5, Xiu-Li Gao1,5.
Abstract
Acanthopanax senticosus extract with excessive standard of Pb, Cd, Hg, and Cu was used as the research object, and the alkyl thiourea functionalised silica was used as a new heavy metal removal scavenger. The heavy metal removal process was optimised by orthogonal experiment with dynamic and static adsorption modes. Meanwhile, the content of Acanthopanax B and Acanthopanax E, the solid content, and the HPLC fingerprint similarity were used as quality monitoring indicators of Acanthopanax senticosus heavy metal removal before and after. Then, the technical adaptability of heavy metal removal by alkyl thiourea functionalised silica was evaluated. Under the optimal dynamic adsorption conditions, the average removal rates of Pb, Cd, Hg, and Cu were 91.64%, 93.04%, 81.77%, and 83.11%, respectively. Under the optimal static adsorption conditions, the average removal rates of Pb, Cd, Hg, and Cu were 82.22%, 89.95%, 81.26%, and 82.97%, respectively. During Acanthopanax senticosus extract heavy metal removal before and after, the change percentage of Acanthopanax B and Acanthopanax E was less than 2.00%, the solid content loss rate was only 0.18%, and the fingerprint similarity was over 99.9%. The method can be used to satisfy the high efficiency of selective removal of harmful elements in Acanthopanax senticosus extract and the effective composition of almost no effect; the method is simple and easy, so it can be recommended for pretreatment of heavy metals in Traditional Chinese Medicine extracts, and this way provides a new thought and research technique to decrease the contents of heavy metals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32309445 PMCID: PMC7136768 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9860425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Schematic diagram of heavy metal removal.
Figure 2Effect of the amount of scavenger on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
Figure 3The effect of shaking speed on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
Figure 4The effect of temperature on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
Figure 5The effect of scavenging time on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
The results of the orthogonal test.
| Serial number | A | B | C | D | Results (rate removal of heavy metals (%)) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Cd | Hg | Cu | Average rate of removal | |||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 65.66 | 58.69 | 43.97 | 45.97 | 53.57 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 85.63 | 89.93 | 81.79 | 61.69 | 79.76 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 87.37 | 91.12 | 82.27 | 84.97 | 86.43 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 66.12 | 63.00 | 49.76 | 43.03 | 55.48 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 82.19 | 87.27 | 76.25 | 65.37 | 77.76 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 72.34 | 65.34 | 59.33 | 63.14 | 65.04 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 66.31 | 63.00 | 46.28 | 41.26 | 54.21 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 69.37 | 65.08 | 62.00 | 58.08 | 63.63 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 80.06 | 73.17 | 63.07 | 74.25 | 72.64 |
| K1 | 73.25 | 54.42 | 60.75 | 67.99 | |||||
| K2 | 66.09 | 73.72 | 69.23 | 66.37 | |||||
| K3 | 63.49 | 74.70 | 72.80 | 68.51 | |||||
|
| 9.76 | 20.28 | 12.05 | 2.18 | |||||
The results of analysis of variance.
| Source of variance | SS |
| MS |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 153.28 | 2 | 19.79 | 19.00 | <0.05 |
| B | 784.75 | 2 | 101.32 | 19.00 | <0.05 |
| C | 230.63 | 2 | 29.78 | 19.00 | <0.05 |
| D (errors) | 7.75 | 2 | 1.00 | 19.00 |
Note: P < 0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant.
The test results of the optimal process conditions.
| Sample serial number | Rate removal of heavy metals (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Cd | Hg | Cu | |
| 1 | 83.31 | 89.26 | 82.89 | 85.17 |
| 2 | 83.29 | 91.47 | 83.03 | 83.12 |
| 3 | 84.27 | 90.12 | 80.28 | 82.26 |
| 4 | 85.34 | 90.91 | 81.79 | 84.53 |
| 5 | 83.27 | 89.25 | 82.51 | 82.64 |
| 6 | 83.43 | 91.33 | 80.01 | 83.39 |
| Average | 82.12 | 89.21 | 81.27 | 82.47 |
| RSD | 1.27 | 1.49 | 1.78 | 1.34 |
Figure 6The effect of diameter to column height on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
Figure 7The effect of washing speed on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
Figure 8The effect of sample volume on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
Figure 9The effect of washing temperature on the removal rate of heavy metals (n = 3).
The results of the orthogonal test.
| Serial number | E | F | G | K | Results (rate removal of heavy metals (%)) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Cd | Hg | Cu | Average rate of removal | |||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 82.07 | 85.13 | 82.31 | 85.95 | 83.89 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 80.16 | 79.55 | 78.00 | 79.71 | 79.36 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 60.07 | 63.08 | 67.33 | 64.93 | 63.85 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 85.13 | 89.61 | 72.14 | 73.05 | 80.11 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 79.39 | 82.18 | 68.66 | 72.37 | 75.65 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 79.60 | 73.33 | 61.76 | 67.34 | 70.51 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 79.88 | 85.06 | 75.64 | 77.08 | 79.42 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 92.67 | 95.05 | 82.17 | 84.96 | 88.72 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 78.69 | 84.38 | 69.12 | 71.65 | 75.96 |
| K1 | 75.70 | 81.13 | 81.03 | 78.42 | |||||
| K2 | 75.88 | 81.09 | 78.43 | 76.76 | |||||
| K3 | 80.78 | 70.19 | 72.89 | 77.18 | |||||
|
| 5.08 | 10.91 | 8.15 | 1.65 | |||||
The results of analysis of variance.
| Source of variance | SS |
| MS |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | 49.85 | 2 | 11.237 | 19.00 | |
| F | 237.40 | 2 | 53.52 | 19.00 | <0.05 |
| G | 103.87 | 2 | 23.45 | 19.00 | <0.05 |
| K (errors) | 4.46 | 2 | 1.00 | 19.00 |
Note: P < 0.05 indicated that the difference is statistically significant.
The test results of the optimal process conditions.
| Sample serial number | Rate removal of heavy metals (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Cd | Hg | Cu | |
| 1 | 91.10 | 93.57 | 80.11 | 85.21 |
| 2 | 90.21 | 95.17 | 82.19 | 81.47 |
| 3 | 93.17 | 92.67 | 83.57 | 84.15 |
| 4 | 91.24 | 92.33 | 80.37 | 83.64 |
| 5 | 92.16 | 91.27 | 82.87 | 80.78 |
| 6 | 91.76 | 93.01 | 81.22 | 83.17 |
| Average | 91.67 | 93.00 | 81.76 | 83.19 |
| RSD | 1.26 | 1.39 | 1.97 | 1.99 |
Determination results of Eleutheroside B and Eleutheroside E with or without metal removal.
| Indicator components | Quality score (%) | Rate of change (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 | Sample 6 | ||
| Acanthopanax B | 0.556 | 0.561 | 0.563 | 0.559 | 0.547 | 0.566 | 0.567 | 1.35 |
| Acanthopanax E | 0.957 | 0.960 | 0.982 | 0.969 | 0.972 | 0.971 | 0.978 | 1.67 |
Figure 10HPLC chromatogram.
Figure 11Evaluate results of the similarity on fingerprint with or without metal removal.