| Literature DB >> 32308973 |
Tran Kiem Hao1, Chau Van Ha1, Nguyen Huu Son1, Pham Nhu Hiep1.
Abstract
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in children is a serious disease. With a proper treatment, a long-term survival rate above 50% is typical. Before 2010, all the AML patients died in our hospital, and abandonment rate was more than 50%. The aims of this study are to explore the long-term outcome of newly childhood acute myeloid patients treated at Hue Central Hospital from 2010 to 2019.A retrospective study was conducted on 98 children with AML who admitted Hue Central Hospital from January 2010 to December 2019. The diagnosis was confirmed by morphological FAB criteria, cytochemistry and immunophenotype. Patients were treated with using modified AML 7-3 Regimen. Social supports were provided to patients/families. A total of 98 children with AML were analyzed with mean age of 5.6 years ranging from 3 months to 15 years. The male to female ratio was 1.8:1. The overall complete remission rate after induction were 82.6%). Patients accounted for 46 (46.9%) had relapses which occurred in during chemotherapy n=27 (27,6%), after finishing chemotherapy n=19(19,4%). Overall survival at 3 years were 23.2%. The event-free survival at 3 years were 20.2%o. Abandonment cases were 4 (4.1%). During the period study, abandonment has been reduced successfully with holistic strategies such as financial support, managing family group, providing education, early follow-up of patients who missed appointments and free accommodation near hospital for patients/families. However, with a high rate patient achieved complete remission after induction phase (82.6%), but the overal survival and event-free survival at 3 years were still low in my hospital (23.2 % and 20.2% respectively). It reflected that it was very difficult to treat successfully AML in lowand middle-income countries. We are considering the way how to improve the quality treatment for childhood acute myeloid leukemia in my hospital. ©Copyright: the Author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Childhood acute myeloid leukemia; outcome; treatment
Year: 2020 PMID: 32308973 PMCID: PMC7160853 DOI: 10.4081/pr.2020.8486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Rep ISSN: 2036-749X
AML immunophenotyping.
| CD13 | CD33 | CD34 | CD15 | CD45 | CD14 | CD41 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | + | + | +++ | - | + | - | - |
| M1 | + | + | + | -/+ | + | - | - |
| M2 | + | + | +/- | +++ | + | - | - |
| M3 | + | + | -/+ | +++ | + | - | - |
| M4 | + | + | -/+ | + | + | + | - |
| M5 | + | +/- | + | + | + | +++ | - |
| M6 | -/+ | +/- | + | - | - | - | - |
| M7 | - | +/- | + | - | - | - | +++ |
Four periods of AML7-3 protocol.
| Induction | Intensification 1 | Intensification 2 | Intensification 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytarabin 100 mg/m2/ day ×7days | Cytarabine 1000mg/ m2/12 | Cytarabine 2000mg/ m2/12 | Repeat intensification |
Demographic characteristics of childhood acute myeloid leukemia by study period.
| Variables | ll case (n=98) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 63 (64.3%) |
| Female | 35 (35.7%) |
| Mean age (range) | 5.56 ± 3.19 (3 months – 15 years) |
| Age, N (%) | |
| ≤ 1 | 11 (11.2) |
| 2-5 | 39 (39.8) |
| 5-9 | 23 (23.5) |
| > 9 | 25 (25.5) |
| Geography | |
| Thua Thien Hue | 28 |
| Quang Tri | 20 |
| Other province | 50 |
| Peripheral Blood | |
| RBC (×1012/L) | 3.27 ± 0.63 |
| Reticulocyte | 0.24 ± 0.13 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 85.12 ± 14.11 |
| WBC (× 109/L) | 47.24 ± 90.69 |
| Platelet count (x 109/L) | 65.25 ± 70.20 |
| Blast (×109/L) | 39.23 ± 39.19 |
| Bone Marrow | |
| Nuclear cells (× 109/L) | 121.92 ± 64.94 |
| % Blast | 66.20 ± 21.39 |
| Blast cell (× 109/L) | 80.69 ± 39.19 |
| Abnormal Karyotyp (n=25) (%) | |
| Hypodiploidy | 7 (7.2) |
| Trisomy 21 | 5 (5.1) |
| Hyperdiploidy | 13 (13.2) |
| FAB classificаtion (%) | |
| M0 | 4 (4.1) |
| M1 | 21 (21.4) |
| M2 | 42 (42.9) |
| M3 | 0 (0) |
| M4 | 8 (8.1) |
| M5 | 16 (16.3) |
| M6 | 5 (5.1) |
| M7 | 2 (2.1) |
Treatment response.
| Variables | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment оutcоme | ||
| Complete remission | 61 | 62.2 |
| Partial remission | 13 | 13.3 |
| No remission | 13 | 13.3 |
| Death | 11 | 11.2 |
| After subsequent therapy | ||
| Achieve a complete remission | 20 | 76.9 |
| No remission | 6 | 23.1 |
| Relapse (n=46) | ||
| During chemotherapy | 27 | 27.6 |
| After finishing chemotherapy | 19 | 19.4 |
| Abandonment | 4 | 4.1 |
Figure 1.Overall survival curve.
Figure 2.Even free survival curve