| Literature DB >> 32308924 |
Hongru Yu1,2, Haiyang Sun3,2, Danyi Wu1,2, Tsung-Ting Kuo1.
Abstract
Blockchain and smart contracts (i.e., computer code that can be run on blockchain) are increasingly popular for healthcare applications. However, only very few implementations exist because of the complexity of the technologies. Although there are tutorials and reviews to introduce blockchain and smart contracts, a pragmatic comparison of such platforms is needed. In this study, we addressed practical considerations while building a healthcare blockchain and smart contract system, by (1) comparing technical features of platforms, (2) selecting three platforms, (3) constructing blockchain networks, (4) testing the blockchains, and (5) summarizing the experience and time used for implementation by students. We evaluated Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, and MultiChain, and confirmed that the selection of a proper platform depends on the requirements of the application. The findings of our study can accelerate the process and reduce the risk of adopting blockchain technology in biomedical and healthcare domain. ©2019 AMIA - All rights reserved.Keywords: Data Sharing; Interoperability and Health Information Exchange; Privacy and Security
Year: 2020 PMID: 32308924 PMCID: PMC7153130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc ISSN: 1559-4076