Literature DB >> 32308876

Have ICD-10 Coding Practices Changed Since 2015?

Srikanth Sivashankaran1, John P Borsi1, Amanda Yoho1.   

Abstract

Usage of ICD-10 codes in administrative data has continued to shift since mandatory adoption in 2015. Identifying changing patterns in coding behavior is imperative in producing reliable analyses and robust conclusions. We examined the granularity of ICD-10 coding over time in a cohort selected from the IBM Explorys Therapeutic Dataset, which contains the records of over 60 million patients. Our seasonality-aware trend model identified patterns of interest, such as increased use of laterality codes for pain and increased use of codes denoting concepts novel to ICD- 10 for screening encounters. Those relying on these codes should adjust for these 'learning curve' effects. This work should be extended to additional modalities of terminology usage and represents a starting point for researchers working with dynamic clinical ontologies. ©2019 AMIA - All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32308876      PMCID: PMC7153097     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  16 in total

1.  The facts about ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation. Implementation will improve the quality of patient care.

Authors:  Jill S Clark
Journal:  J AHIMA       Date:  2012-03

2.  HIPAA administrative simplification: modifications to medical data code set standards to adopt ID-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2009-01-16

3.  Changes in Coding of Suicide Attempts or Self-Harm With Transition From ICD-9 to ICD-10.

Authors:  Christine Stewart; Phillip M Crawford; Gregory E Simon
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  The content coverage of clinical classifications. For The Computer-Based Patient Record Institute's Work Group on Codes & Structures.

Authors:  C G Chute; S P Cohn; K E Campbell; D E Oliver; J R Campbell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  ANALYZING EIGHT MONTHS OF ICD-10.

Authors:  Mary Butler
Journal:  J AHIMA       Date:  2016-06

6.  Early ICD-10 audits indicate a learning curve for general surgeons.

Authors:  Teri Romano; Betty Hovey
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-06

7.  Trends in Opioid-related Inpatient Stays Shifted After the US Transitioned to ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Coding in 2015.

Authors:  Kevin C Heslin; Pamela L Owens; Zeynal Karaca; Marguerite L Barrett; Brian J Moore; Anne Elixhauser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Implementation of ICD-10 in Canada: how has it impacted coded hospital discharge data?

Authors:  Robin L Walker; Deirdre A Hennessy; Helen Johansen; Christie Sambell; Lisa Lix; Hude Quan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Improved accuracy of co-morbidity coding over time after the introduction of ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Januel; Jean-Christophe Luthi; Hude Quan; François Borst; Patrick Taffé; William A Ghali; Bernard Burnand
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004
View more
  1 in total

1.  Validating International Classification of Disease 10th Revision algorithms for identifying influenza and respiratory syncytial virus hospitalizations.

Authors:  Mackenzie A Hamilton; Andrew Calzavara; Scott D Emerson; Mohamed Djebli; Maria E Sundaram; Adrienne K Chan; Rafal Kustra; Stefan D Baral; Sharmistha Mishra; Jeffrey C Kwong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.