Literature DB >> 32308485

The Evaluation of Magee Equation 2 in Predicting Response and Outcome in Hormone Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Napat Saigosoom1, Doonyapat Sa-Nguanraksa1, Eng O-Charoenrat2, Thanawat Thumrongtaradol1, Pornchai O-Charoenrat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Magee Equations have been developed as accurate tools for predicting response and clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy using basic clinicopathological parameters. This study aims to evaluate the alternative application of Magee Equation 2 score in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who received NAC from January 2010 to May 2018 at Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, were recruited. Pre-treatment status of HR and HER2 was used to calculate the Magee Equation 2 scores. The pCR rates among different clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. Survival analysis was performed by Log-rank test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 215 patients were eligible. The pCR rates for low, intermediate, and high scores were 4.8%, 3.6%, and 23.8%, respectively. Patients with high scores had significantly higher size reduction and pCR rates compared to those with intermediate or low scores (p<0.001). Those with high scores had higher rates of locoregional recurrence and death. The patients with high score had significantly lower overall survival (p=0.034).
CONCLUSION: Among patients with HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer treated with NAC, Magee Equation 2 might be used as a tool for predicting the pCR and clinical outcome.
© 2020 Saigosoom et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magee Equation; breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathologic complete response; survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 32308485      PMCID: PMC7152538          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S237423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


  30 in total

1.  Proliferation rate and breast cancer subtype, but not ALDH1 expression, predict pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Debajyoti Chatterjee; Amanjit Bal; Ashim Das; Gurpreet Singh
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Gene expression profiles in paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue predict response to chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Luca Gianni; Milvia Zambetti; Kim Clark; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Jenny Wu; Gabriella Mariani; Jaime Rodriguez; Marialuisa Carcangiu; Drew Watson; Pinuccia Valagussa; Roman Rouzier; W Fraser Symmans; Jeffrey S Ross; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai; Steven Shak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Findings from recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies in stage I breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; J H Jeong; J Dignam; S Anderson; E Mamounas; D L Wickerham; N Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2001

5.  Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Melina B Flanagan; David J Dabbs; Adam M Brufsky; Sushil Beriwal; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends--An Update.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Rebecca L Siegel; Elizabeth M Ward; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A phase II trial of ixabepilone and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-negative breast cancer: correlation of pathologic complete response with the 21-gene recurrence score.

Authors:  Denise A Yardley; Nancy W Peacock; Mythili Shastry; Howard A Burris; Rebecca G Bechhold; Carolyn B Hendricks; Carl N Yoshizawa; Amy P Sing; John D Hainsworth
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Incidence of invasive breast cancer by hormone receptor status from 1992 to 1998.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Nomogram for accurate prediction of breast and axillary pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node positive patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Hee Jun Choi; Jai Min Ryu; Isaac Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Jonghan Yu; Jeong Eon Lee; Se Kyung Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and the Molecular Classification of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in a Latin American Cohort.

Authors:  Sandra Esperanza Díaz-Casas; Jorge Alberto Castilla-Tarra; Esperanza Pena-Torres; Martha Orozco-Ospino; Sara Mendoza-Diaz; Marcela Nuñez-Lemus; Oscar Garcia-Angulo; Mauricio Garcia-Mora; Luis Guzman-AbiSaab; Carlos Lehmann-Mosquera; Javier Angel-Aristizabal; Carlos Duarte-Torres; Juan Carlos Vergel-Martinez
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.