Literature DB >> 32308333

Evaluation of Efficacy of Curcumin along with Lycopene and Piperine in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.

Basudev Mahato1,2, Chandraday Prodhan3, Samir Mandal2,3, Avirup Dutta3, Parna Kumar1, Tushar Deb1, Tarun Jha4, Keya Chaudhuri2,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a high-risk premalignant condition of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Complete regression of the disease is still not possible with available treatment modalities. AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of curcumin, lycopene, and piperine as a combination in the management of OSMF. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: Efficacy was evaluated on the basis of improvement in clinical parameters (i.e., visual Analog Scale [VAS]) score for burning sensation, mouth opening (MO), mucosal flexibility (MF), and tongue protrusion [TP]).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients clinically and histopathologically diagnosed with OSMF were included in the study; patients were administered with the above-stated drug combination, and clinical parameters were evaluated at regular intervals to compare the pre- and post-treatment measurements. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired t-test was done to evaluate significance of the results.
RESULTS: Highly significant improvement was observed for posttreatment reduction in VAS score for burning sensation and increase in MO (P < 0.001). Significant improvement was also observed in the increase of MF and TP. Posttreatment histopathological evaluation also revealed reepithelialization, indicated by significant increase in the epithelial thickness as found through quantitative image analysis. Immunohistochemical studies with Col1A1 showed decrease in collagen deposition.
CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the present study proposes the usage of combination drug therapy for the management of OSMF as an effective and affordable way. Copyright:
© 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curcumin; lycopene; mouth opening; mucosal flexibility; oral submucous fibrosis; piperine; visual Analog Scale score for burning sensation

Year:  2019        PMID: 32308333      PMCID: PMC7150573          DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_937_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent        ISSN: 0976-2361


Introduction

Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic progressive scarring disease of oral mucosa, associated with juxtaepithelial inflammatory reaction followed by fibroelastic changes in lamina propria, leading to stiffness of oral mucosa, causing restricted mouth opening (MO) and tongue movement (trismus), burning sensation in the oral cavity, and difficulty in eating.[1] The fibrotic change may involve hypersalivation/xerostomia and mucosal blanching with fibrous bands in the labial mucosa, buccal mucosa, retromolar pads, soft palate, uvula, and floor of oral cavity, as well as pharynx, esophagus, and paratubal muscles of Eustachian tubes.[2] The disease most commonly affects habitual areca nut, betel quid, and gutkha chewers and most frequently involved age group is 20–30 years, though etiopathogenesis of the disease is considered to be multifactorial, including excessive chilly consumption, Vitamin B and iron deficiency, genetic, immunological, and environmental causes.[3] Commonly prevalent among Asians, the disease provides high risk for development of oral malignancy, with a transformation rate of around 7.6%.[4] Different treatment modalities, both medicinal and surgical, have been advocated for relieving signs and symptoms of the disease, though complete regression has not been reported till date. Therefore, the search for an effective treatment modality still continues. A number of studies have attempted to find the efficacy of different natural plant extracts, antioxidants, synthetic drugs, etc., for the management of OSMF.[5678] One such plant is Curcuma longa, which is used as an Indian spice derived from the rhizomes of the plant. Its principal active constituent curcumin promotes wound healing and also has anti-inflammatory, immune-modulatory, and antioxidant properties;[9] it has been studied for its effectiveness against cancer and various other diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and Alzheimer's disease.[10] Curcumin showed inhibitory properties against lipooxygenase and cyclooxygenase (COX) activities that can induce inflammation,[11] and lowers the activity of smokeless tobacco extract or nicotine-derived nitrosamine ketone-induced nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells and COX-2 in oral premalignant and malignant cells.[12] Lycopene, a nonpro-vitamin A carotenoid, predominantly found in tomatoes, pink grapefruit, watermelon, papaya, guava, and other fruits showing high antioxidant and singlet-oxygen-quenching ability twice that of beta-carotene and ten times higher than that of alpha-tocopherol 2, is described as the most potent radical scavenger in various in vivo and in vitro studies.[1314] Again, the alkaloid piperine from Piper nigrum has shown to increase the bioavailability of various compounds, especially curcumin by 20 folds.[15] Meanwhile, combination therapy comprising a treatment modality that combines two or more therapeutic agents has evolved as a cornerstone of cancer therapeutics.[16] Toxicity produced through combination therapy of chemotherapeutic drugs can be significantly less because different pathways will be targeted. Working in a synergistic or additive manner, combination therapy eventually provides with a lower therapeutic dosage of each individual drug. In addition, combination therapy can induce simultaneous prevention of toxic effects on normal cells and cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. Emerging approach of restrictive combinations (RC) of drugs focuses on strategic dosing and drug administration based on the molecular differences between cancer cells and normal cells. In this approach, additional drugs can be added to improve the therapeutic potency in a synergistic manner but without undesirable side effects. As a result, combination therapy has emerged as potential therapeutic modality with limited treatment resistance and toxicity and increased efficacy. On the other hand, synergistic effect of curcumin or lycopene with irradiation has been evidenced upon oral squamous cell carcinoma cells,[17] whereas lycopene has been found to work synergistically with natural antioxidants.[18] In a number of studies, curcumin and lycopene has been separately applied for the management of OSMF;[192021222324] however, a combinational approach has not been attempted yet. Thus, for the present study, we have intended for management of OSMF patients with a combination drug constituted by curcumin, lycopene, and piperine for having a meaningful success level for the said purpose.

Materials and Methods

Selection of participants

The study was conducted in the Department of Oral Pathology, Dr. R. Ahmed Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata, India. As participants, forty patients clinically diagnosed with OSMF (without malignancy) were selected for this study; all these patients belong to the Bengali population of West Bengal, India. Patients with any other oral malignant or premalignant lesions (e.g., hypertrophic lichen planus, candidiasis, etc.), any infectious or contagious disease process, or intractable medical or radiological abnormalities were excluded from the study. After clinical evaluation and collection of written informed consent, histopathological evaluation was done in ten randomly selected patients who had no contraindication for performing incisional biopsy. Clearance certificate of this study was obtained from the institutional ethics committee.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients having oral habits for >6 months with clinical sign of OSMF were included in the study. OSMF clinical diagnostic symptoms included burning sensation in the mouth while eating spicy or hot food, dryness of mouth, occasional vesicle formation and ulceration, and restricted MO with difficulty in swallowing. Patients who were medically compromised such as patients suffering from any infectious or contagious disease or with any intractable medical or radiological abnormality, any other white patch-like candidiasis, hypertrophic oral lichen planus and lichenoid-like lesions, and scleroderma were not included in the present study. Furthermore, patients who received previous treatment or with previous history of surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or patients using vitamin or dietary supplement were excluded from the study. Cases complaining of difficulty in opening the mouth due to other reasons such as inflammation, etc., were excluded from the study.

Drug treatment and clinical evaluation

Each patient was motivated to stop chewing areca nut or tobacco 1 month prior to the commencement of the treatment, and then prescribed with commercially available combination drug BIOCUMIN (Biochem India) twice a day for 3 months. Each tablet comprised curcumin (500 mg), piperine (5 mg), and lycopene (25 mg). The responses were assessed clinically every 15 days up to a follow-up period of 3 months. Parameters used for this clinical evaluation were MO, tongue protrusion (TP), mucosal flexibility (MF), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of burning sensation (VAS). For MO, interincisal distance was measured using vernier calipers; TP was measured from the margin of the lower incisor to the tip of the tongue. To determine the MF or cheek flexibility, the point of intersection of the two imaginary lines, one joining the tragus of the ear and angle of the mouth and another perpendicular line from the outer canthus of the ipsilateral eye extended downward, was marked as the reference point on both sides of the face; the distance between the two reference points at normal centric occlusion was recorded as m1. The patient was asked to blow the cheeks fully with lips closed and the distance between the reference points was recorded as m2. The difference between the two values (m2–m1) was used as measure of MF. Burning sensation was recorded on VAS ranging from 0 to 10, with ten-grade showing maximum burning sensation. The OSMF patients were divided into four subgroups based on their MO (Group I: >35 mm; Group II: 30.1–35 mm; Group III: 20-30 mm; Group IV: <20 mm) following Lai's classification (1995).[25] All the patients were having areca chewing habits. Habit counseling was done before start of the treatment. Patients were advised to stop oral habits and certain dietary modifications such as elimination of spicy food including high consumption of chillies.

Histopathology

Pre- and post-treatment biopsy specimens collected from OSMF patients were processed for paraffin embedding. Sections of 4–5-μm thickness were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively following hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining and visualization under LEICA DM 3000 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Switzerland). Image-J analysis system (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the epithelial thickness from multiple sections.

Immunohistochemistry

Biopsy specimens collected from OSMF patients were paraffin-embedded and 4–5 μm thickness sections were collected on poly-L-lysine-coated slides, after paraffin removal using xylene and rehydration (100%, 90%, and 70% of ethanol for 5 min, treated with deionized water for 10 min), the slides were treated with citrate buffer for unmasking the antigen. Further immunostaining was performed using Novolink polymer detection system ((Novocastra™, UK). The endogenous peroxidase and protein were blocked using supplied blockers. The expression Col1A1 protein was detected with primary antibody of Col1A1 (1:100, Novus Biologicals, USA). After postprimary blocking, sections were incubated with Novolink polymer and were then developed with DAB using supplied DAB substrate buffer. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and were observed under LEICA DM 3000 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Switzerland).

Statistical analysis

All the statistical analysis was done using Statistical software SPSS v.16.0. (statistical package for social science by International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, New York, United States). The results for each group, their clinical parameters and epithelial thickness (pre- and post-therapy) were calculated as mean ± standard deviation. Paired t-test was done to evaluate significance of the results. P ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

For the present study, a total number of 40 OSMF patients were selected from the Outpatient Department of Dr. R. Ahamed Dental College, Kolkata. The mean age of the group under study was 34.75 years (standard deviation ± 11.53 years). The age range was 18–62 years with male: female ratio 7:1. The patients were further subdivided to four groups based on the interincisal distance following Lai's classification (Group I: >35 mm, Group II: Between 30.1 and 35 mm; Group III: Between 20 and 30 mm; and Group IV: <20 mm), so that ten patients belonged to each of the four groups. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated based on the pre- and post-treatment values of four clinical parameters (i.e., VAS) score for burning sensation, MO, MF, and TP) measured from each of the patient under study [Figure 1]. Again, tissue sections from ten randomly selected patients were collected through biopsy procedure at pre- and post-treatment stage and were evaluated for expression of collagen-1 protein by immune-histochemistry technique. All the samples were collected after getting informed consent from the patient. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Institution.
Figure 1

Posttreatment improvement of Visual Analog Scale score of burning sensation, mouth opening, mucosal flexibility, and tongue protrusion (TPin different groups of oral submucous fibrosis patients)

Posttreatment improvement of Visual Analog Scale score of burning sensation, mouth opening, mucosal flexibility, and tongue protrusion (TPin different groups of oral submucous fibrosis patients) All the four clinical parameters under consideration showed improvement at the posttreatment stage [Table 1]. The average VAS score for burning sensation of all the patients showed significant reduction at the posttreatment stage. In Group I, the mean VAS score reduced from 8.7 to 0.28; Group II showed a reduction from 8.1 to 0.37; Group III revealed a reduction of VAS score from 7.4 to 0.46, and VAS score in Group IV reduced from 7.6 to 0.46. The reduction in the VAS scores in all the subgroups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Again, the MO was significantly increased in all the subgroups at the posttreatment stage; the mean MO was significantly increased from 27.21 mm to 30.83 mm. In Group I, the average MO was increased from 38.93 mm to 43.37 mm; Group II showed increase in MO from 32.38 mm to 36.5 mm; an increase from 24.67 mm to 28.05 mm of MO was observed in the Group III; while the Group IV showed increased MO from 12.86 mm to 15.38 mm. The increase in the MO in all the subgroups was also statistically significant (P < 0.001). For TP in Group I, posttreatment TP increased from 28.3 mm to 31.4 mm; Group II showed increase from 34.4 mm to 37.6 mm; Group III showed an increase from 29.5 mm to 32 mm of TP; whereas in Group IV, the TP increased from 21.3 mm to 23.5 mm. MF was significantly improved in all the four subgroups (6.5 mm to 7 mm in Group I, 5.7 mm to 6.2 mm in Group II, 4.97 mm to 5.65 mm in Group III, and 5.3 mm to 6.09 mm in Group IV, respectively); the increase in mean MF also increased from 5.62 mm to 6.24 mm, which is statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Table 1

Posttreatment efficacy of curcumin on Visual Analog Scale score of burning sensation (Visual Analog Scale), cheek flexibility, mouth opening, and tongue protrusion

ParameterCases (n=40)Group I (n=10)Group II (n=10)Group III (n=10)Group IV (n=10)





Pretreat-mentPosttreat-mentP*Pretreat-mentPosttreat-mentP*Pretreat-mentPosttreat-mentP*Pretreat-mentPosttreat-mentP*Pretreat-mentPosttreat-mentP*
VAS score for burning sensation7.95±0.930.39±0.43<0.0018.7±0.480.28±0.38<0.0018.1±0.880.37±0.43<0.0017.4±0.840.46±0.46<0.0017.6±0.970.46±0.46<0.001
MO27.21±10.2930.83±11.99<0.00138.93±3.7543.37±4.67<0.00132.38±1.6536.5±1.99<0.00124.67±2.5528.05±2.77<0.00112.86±4.1615.38±4.27<0.001
TP28.38±7.1431.13±9.1<0.00128.3±9.1531.4±10.680.00934.4±2.6837.6±2.68<0.00129.5±5.1532±4.99<0.00121.3±2.4923.5±2.27<0.001
Mucosal flexibility5.62±1.336.24±1.4<0.0016.5±1.437±1.410.0145.7±1.346.2±1.670.0234.97±0.915.65±1.20.0025.3±1.256.09±1.11<0.001

*Significance level P≤0.05. VAS: Visual Analog Scale; MO: Mouth opening

Posttreatment efficacy of curcumin on Visual Analog Scale score of burning sensation (Visual Analog Scale), cheek flexibility, mouth opening, and tongue protrusion *Significance level P≤0.05. VAS: Visual Analog Scale; MO: Mouth opening To further evaluate the effect of the therapy, H and E staining was performed before and after the completion of the therapy [Figure 2]. Pretherapy microphotograph showed thin atrophic epithelium with subepithelial hyalinization and homogenization with a few blood vessels, whereas posttherapy micrographs revealed increased thickness of epithelium along with reduced hyalinization and increasing number of blood vessels in the connective tissue. The epithelial thickness was measured in multiple H and E-stained histopathological sections of pre- and post-therapy biopsy samples with image analysis software Image-J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) [Table 2]. The results distinctly indicated a significant MO increase in the epithelial thickness in posttherapy samples (pretreatment: 0.22, ±0.036; posttreatment: 0.38, ±0.088) (t = −29.826; P ≤ 0.001).
Figure 2

Representative image of hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathological section of oral submucous fibrosis tissues at × 10 magnification (a) pretreament; (b) posttreatment, showing reduced hyalinization (blue arrow) and increased number of blood vessels (red arrow) after treatment

Table 2

Posttreatment efficacy of curcumin on epithelial thickness

ParametersMean pretreatment epithelial thickness (mm)Mean posttreatment epithelial thickness (mm)P*
Mean±SD0.217±0.0360.382±0.088<0.001
Maximum0.2840.574
Minimum0.1240.119

*Significance level P≤0.05. SD: Standard deviation

Representative image of hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathological section of oral submucous fibrosis tissues at × 10 magnification (a) pretreament; (b) posttreatment, showing reduced hyalinization (blue arrow) and increased number of blood vessels (red arrow) after treatment Posttreatment efficacy of curcumin on epithelial thickness *Significance level P≤0.05. SD: Standard deviation Efficacy of the combinational drug treatment was further evaluated by determining the expression of Col1A1 by immune histochemistry to determine the collagen density before and after therapy [Figure 3]. As shown in [Figure 3a], Col1A1 expression was observed throughout the thickness of stratified squamous epithelium, lamina propria, submucosal layer, and connective tissue. An overall reduction in collagen expression was noticed following the therapy [Figure 3b].
Figure 3

Representative image of Immunohistochemistry for localization of Col1A1 in histopathological section of oral submucous fibrosis tissues at × 10 magnification (a) pretreament; (b) posttreatment, showing reduced expression of Col1A1 after treatment

Representative image of Immunohistochemistry for localization of Col1A1 in histopathological section of oral submucous fibrosis tissues at × 10 magnification (a) pretreament; (b) posttreatment, showing reduced expression of Col1A1 after treatment

Discussion

Clinical management of OSMF is symptomatic and aimed primarily at improving MO. Various methods, such as intralesional injection of corticosteroid/interferon-gamma, micronutrient supplement, physiotherapy, and surgical interventions, have been used to alleviate burning sensation, improving MO, and reducing fibrous bands. All the patients of the present study had a history of consuming gutkha, accompanied by occasional smoking and alcohol consumption which can be considered as the major factor for the development of the disease. Before starting any regime of treatment, initial management strategy should mandatorily be the discontinuation of associated detrimental oral habits along with patient counseling and education, which was followed in the present study. Again, the choice of treatment modality is significant; topical application provides for direct availability of the drug to the primary affected buccal site, but chances of washing out by the saliva may hinder the efficacy. Curcumin, the principal curcuminoid found in turmeric and considered as its most active constituent, as well as lycopene, the high potent antioxidant found in tomatoes and green vegetables, were studied for their effectiveness against cancer and also in wide range of other conditions. A number of studies have attempted the use of curcumin or lycopene in different forms for the management of OSMF, as well as three standard treatment modules, which have been summarized in Table 3. Most of these studies have evaluated the clinical parameters of burning sensation and MO; however, none of them have considered the MF, which is a significant parameter for evaluation of the diseased mucosa.[32] Again, few of the studies have noted some limitations in the topical application of curcumin.[52227] In our study, we have attempted to find out the efficacy of a combinational modality combining curcumin, lycopene, and piperine on the improvement over the burning sensation, MO, TP, and MF. All the patients of this study had a history of consuming gutkha, accompanied by smoking also in some cases. Similar to previous studies, all forty patients, administered with combination of curcumin, lycopene, and piperine revealed a general improvement with reduction of burning sensation and increase in MO, MF, and TP. MO in Group III showed highest improvement (1.14-fold increase), whereas MF increased 1.2 fold in Group IV which were the highest among all four groups. For TP, nearly equal improvement was observed for all the subgroups. The improvement in reduction of burning sensation was also significant for the OSMF patients. Analysis of the VAS score for burning sensation showed 0.03-, 0.04-, 0.06-, and 0.06-fold reduction in Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. When the overall improvement was considered, the combinational herbal drug therapy showed statistically significant posttreatment improvement (P < 0.001).
Table 3

Studies showing the application of curcumin and/or lycopene for management of oral submucous fibrosis

Details of patientsTherapeutic strategyDose of therapyMode of application of curcumin/lycopeneDuration of therapyParameters studiedBrief resultAny adverse reactionAuthors
39 patients (15-35 years of age) from Bombay (Mumbai)TO; TOR; alcoholic TEGroup I: TE-3 g/dayGroup II: 600 mg TOR + 3 g of TE/dayGroup III: 600 mg TO + 3 g of TE/dayOral-systemic (capsules)3 monthsNumber of MN cells in exfoliated oral mucosal cells and circulating lymphocytesDecrease in MN observed; Reduction of MN by TOR was more in oral mucosal cells, the decrease in MN in lymphocytes was comparable in all three groupsNo dataHastak et al.[19]
83 patients (18-70 years of age) from KarnatakaLycopene, lycopene + intralesional steroid injectionsGroup I: 16 mg lycopene/day in 2 dosesGroup II: 16 mg lycopene/day in 2 doses, and intralesional injections of betamethasone (2 ampoules of 4 mg/ml) two times weeklyOral systemic (4 mg soft gels)2 monthsMO, TP, burning sensation (VAS), palpationImproved MO and TP in both groups; Complete relief from burning sensation in both groups posttreatmentNo side effects or intoleranceKumar et al.[26]
48 patients (age not specified) from TrivandrumCurcumin capsule, TOGroup I: 1 g (two capsules twice) dailyGroup II: 600 mg (12 drops of oil twice) dailyOral systemic (capsules) Topical (oil to hold in mouth and swallow)Treatment-3 months follow-up period-6 monthsBurning sensation, intolerance to spicy food, MO, TPReduction in burning sensation and intolerance to spicy food observed at 3 months of treatment. The mean increase in MO was 0.87 cm in both the groups after the follow-up period. Increase in TP better in Group II. Curcumin produced quicker improvement; TO appeared to have long-term effectChange of color of oral mucosa (blanched to erythematous) in Group IIDas et al.[27]
25 patients (age not specified) from New DelhiCurcumin1 g (curcumin [Cur]-900 mg, desmethoxy Cur-80 mg, bisdesmethoxyCur-20 mg)Oral-systemic (caplets)211 daysPain (VAS), lesion size, MO, serum and salivary vitamins C and E; MDA; 8-OhdGPain score and size of lesion decreased (P<0.05); MO increased (24.64 [3.2]-39.4[3], P<0.05). Serum and salivary vitamins C and E increased, while MDA and 8-OhdG decreasedNo treatment related toxic effect up to 8 g/dayRai et al.[12]
46 patients (17-57 years of age) from WardhaLycopeneLycopene (8 mg)/day divided in 2 dosesOral-systemic (8 mg soft gel)3 monthsPresence of oral lesions, burning sensation (VAS) and intolerance to spice, MOImproved MO; reduced burning sensation and intolerance to spices, and absence of erythematous areas or ulceration or erosionsNo side effect or intolerance to lycopeneKaremore and Motwani (2012)[28]
45 patients (18-49 years of age) from ChennaiLycopene + intralesional steroids and hyaluronidaseLycopene 16 mg/day with biweekly intralesional injections of dexamethasone 1.5 ml and hyaluronidase 1500 IU mixed with lignocaineOral-systemic (capsules with lycopene 5000 µg, various micronutrients)6 weeksBurning sensation on VAS, MOSignificant increase in MO by lycopene+intralesional steroids and hyaluronidase compared to oral antioxidant capsule and/or intralesional steroids and hyaluronidase.No adverse effect was foundSelvam and Dayanand[29]
30 patients (18-50 years of age) from LucknowCurcumin + piperineCurcumin (900 mg) + piperine (15 mg)/dayOral-systemic (tablet with curcumin 300 mg and piperine 5 mg)1 monthMO, burning sensation on VASStatistically significant change in burning sensation on VAS; maximum improvement in MO in patients with initial MO <20 mmNo dataAgarwal et al.[30]
44 patients (15-60 years of age) from Lucknow, BhilaiLycopene, intralesional injection of betamethasoneGroup I: 10,000 mcg of Lycopene daily in two equally divided dosesGroup II: Intralesional injection of betamethasone (4 mg) two times weeklyOral-systemic-soft gel (lycopene-5000 mcg with vitamin A, C, E, B1, B2, B6, B12, D3, sodium selenite, chromium chloride, zinc sulfate monohydrate, manganese sulfate, folic acid, niacinamide, calcium pantothenate)Treatment: 2 months; follow up: 4 monthsMO, burning sensation on VASBetter improvement in MO in Group I (37.62%, 12 mm) compared to group II (13%, 3.9 mm); Group I also showed more reduction of burning sensation (94.5%) than group II (54.1%)No side effects foundSingh et al.[31]
41 patients (17-56 years of age) from VaranasiTurmeric powder + tulsi powderTurmeric powder (1 g) + tulsi powder (1 g) mixed in glycerine (paste) −4-5 times/dayOral-topical (paste application to oral mucosa, hold for 15 min)3 monthsBurning sensation (VAS), MO as inter-incisional distance (mm)Mean burning sensation 6.07±1.75 before treatment; 2.22±1.41 after treatment (t=15.52; P<0.001). Mean MO 24.46±4.0 mm before treatment; 27.85±3.39 mm after treatment (t=9.06; P<0.001)Out of 41 patients, 3 patients experienced bad taste, mild headacheSrivastava et al. (2015)[21]
20 patients (20-40 years of age) from LucknowCurcumin + piperine2 tablets containing curcuma longa (300 mg), piperine (5 mg) dailyOral-systemic (tablets)12 weeksBurning sensation (VAS), IID, TPThe mean increase in IID was 1.25 mm; mean increase in TP at the end of the study period was 0.38 mm. Burning sensation improvedNo dataYadav et al.[2]
15 patients (18--50 years of age) from NagpurCurcumin + physiotherapy exercises by mouth exercise device2 g of longvida lozenges (containing 400 mg curcumin) dailyOral-topical (lozenges)Treatment: 3 monthsFollow-up: 6 monthsInterincisal distance, Burning sensation for normal and spicy food (VAS)Increase in MO 5.93±2.37 mm. In relation to VAS scale with spicy and normal food the average reduction was 64 (42-73) and 77 (70.5-82)Yellowish coating over teeth and dorsum of tongue observed in 3 patientsHazarey et al.[22]
120 patients (age not specified) from ChattisgarhLycopene, aloe veraGroup I: 8 mg lycopene daily in two divided dosesGroup II: 5 mg aloe vera gel to be applied topically thrice dailyOral-systemic (capsule)3 monthsMO, TP, VAS for burning sensation, pain associated with the lesion, and difficulty in swallowing and speechClinical improvements in MO and TP were significant in Group I (P<0.001). Subjective symptoms of burning sensation (P=0.007), pain associated with the lesion (P=0.005), and difficulty in swallowing and speech (P=0.003) improved in both the groups but were insignificant. There was a mild to moderate decrease in the size of the lesionFew patients reported nausea in the early visitsPatil et al.[5]
30 patients (>15 years of age) from RaichurCurcumin, lycopeneGroup I: Lycopene 8 mg/day (in 2 doses)Group II: Curcumin 800 mg/day (in 2 doses)Oral-systemic (capsule with lycopene-2000 mcg, zinc-7.5 mg, selenium-35 mcg); Haridra capsule: Curcuma longa-400 mg3 monthsMO; burning sensation (VAS); blanching of buccal mucosaGroup I: Better improvement in MO (6 mm) than Group II (3 mm); better improvement in reduction of fibrous bands. Group II: Better reduction in severity of burning sensation; better reduction of blanching of buccal mucosaNo dataKopuri et al.[23]
60 patients (<30 years of age) from LucknowLycopene, curcuminGroup I: Lycopene 4 mg/day (in 2 doses)Group II: Curcumin 900 mg/day (in 3 doses)Oral-systemic, lycopene capsule (lycopene-4 mg, Zinc-7.5 mg, selenium-35 mg), curcumin tablet (Curcuma longa extract-300 mg, Piper nigrum 5 mg)3 monthsMO; burning sensation (VAS)Complete cessation of burning sensation in both groups; Group I showed better improvement in MO (11.1%) than Group II (6.2%)No dataSaran et al.[20]
40 patients (18-62 years of age) from KolkataLycopene + curcumin + piperineCurcumin (1 g), lycopene (50 mg), piperine (10 mg)/day in two divided dosesOral-systemic tablet biocumin: Curcumin (500 mg), piperine (5 mg) and lycopene (25 mg3 monthsBurning sensation on VAS, MO, and TP mucosal flexibilityComplete reduction of burning sensation and significant increase in MO, TP, and mucosal flexibilityNo adverse effect is foundPresent study
28 patients (21-60 years of age) from BengaluruHyaluronidase and dexamethasone injectionHyaluronidase 1500 IU mixed in 1.5 ml of dexamethasone and 0.5 ml of lignocaine HCLIntralesional injection biweekly4 weeksBurning sensation and MO, blanching of oral mucosa, presence of vesicles and ulcers, palpable bands, limitation of tongue movementImprovement in the patient’s MO with a net gain of 6±2 mm (92%), the range being 4-8 mm. Defnite reduction in burning sensation, painful ulceration and blanching of oral mucosa and patient followed up for an average of 9 monthsNo dataL James et al. (2015)
29 patients (the mean age of the patients was 39.64±7.2 years)Pentoxifylline therapyInitial 400 mg tablet twice a day initial 30 days and then thrice a day for rest 6 monthsOral administration7 monthsMO, TP, fibrotic bandImprovement in MO, TP, and relief from perioral fibrotic bands subjective symptoms of intolerance to spices burning sensation of mouth, tinnitus, difficulty in swallowing and difficulty in speech were also improved significantlyFrequent complaints of dyspepsia, nausea and/or vomiting in <3% of the patients receiving 1200 mg per day in SRT form. Approximately 1% report bloating, flatus, and bleedingR Rajendran et al. (2006)[33]
52 patients (10-55 years of age) from Jabalpur, MP, IndiaTriamcinolone therapyTriamcinolone acetate, which was given at biweekly intervals at the dose of 40 mg for a period of 12 weeksLocal injections, on multiple sites in the oral cavity using insulin syringe12 weeksInterincisal MOA highly significant improvement in the interincisal MO is seen following treatment in study group with submucosal injection of triamcinoloneNo dataNT Ameer et al. (2012)[34]

TO: Turmeric oil; TOR: Turmeric oleoresin; TE: Turmeric extract; MN: Micronucleated; IID: Interincisal distance; TP: Tongue protrusion; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; MO: Mouth opening; MDA: Malondialdehyde; HCL: Hydrochloride; SRT: Sustained release tablet

Studies showing the application of curcumin and/or lycopene for management of oral submucous fibrosis TO: Turmeric oil; TOR: Turmeric oleoresin; TE: Turmeric extract; MN: Micronucleated; IID: Interincisal distance; TP: Tongue protrusion; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; MO: Mouth opening; MDA: Malondialdehyde; HCL: Hydrochloride; SRT: Sustained release tablet The other factor considered in this study was the effect of the combinational herbal drug treatment on the tissue morphology and collagen production. Curcumin exerts anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting a number of different molecules that participate in the process of inflammation. Its ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation and check cellular proliferation reduces collagen synthesis rate, conferring its fibrinolytic property. Histopathologically, all the sections, irrespective of Group, revealed reepithelialization, although the degree varied. The appearance of rete pegs was also visible with increase in blood vessels in the connective tissue region. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed decrease in collagen content following therapy. The data showed significant increase in VAS, MF, epithelial thickness, and decrease in collagen bands following therapy.[3334] Thus, curcumin is considered as a safe nontoxic and effective alternative for many conventional drugs, due to its distinguishable therapeutic properties and multifarious effects on different systems of the body. Statistically significant improvement in the clinical sign and symptoms were observed among different group of OSMF patients treated with combination therapy of curcumin. Positive changes were also observed in pre- and post-histopathological evaluation of the therapy. The choice of combination therapy is noninvasive, beneficial, and affordable drug management in all grades of OSMF. Extensive study with a larger number of patients backed by longer periods of follow-up is necessary to arrive at a definitive conclusion. Thus, we reiterate curcumin, in combination with lycopene and piperine, has the potential of being an alternative therapeutic measure for treating all grades of OSMF patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  26 in total

1.  Comparison of curcumin with intralesional steroid injections in Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A randomized, open-label interventional study.

Authors:  Monu Yadav; K Aravinda; Vasu S Saxena; K Srinivas; P Ratnakar; Jyothi Gupta; Arti Saluja Sachdev; Peeyush Shivhare
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-11-20

2.  Tomatoes, tomato-rich foods, lycopene and cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract: a case-control in Uruguay.

Authors:  E De Stefani; F Oreggia; P Boffetta; H Deneo-Pellegrini; A Ronco; M Mendilaharsu
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 3.  Multi-targeted therapy by curcumin: how spicy is it?

Authors:  Ajay Goel; Sonia Jhurani; Bharat B Aggarwal
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.914

4.  Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers.

Authors:  G Shoba; D Joy; T Joseph; M Majeed; R Rajendran; P S Srinivas
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Clinical evaluation of the role of tulsi and turmeric in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A pilot, prospective observational study.

Authors:  Adit Srivastava; Rahul Agarwal; T P Chaturvedi; Akhilesh Chandra; O P Singh
Journal:  J Ayurveda Integr Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

6.  Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis with Injection of Hyaluronidase and Dexamethasone in Grade III Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Leena James; Akshay Shetty; Diljith Rishi; Marin Abraham
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-08

Review 7.  Combination therapy in combating cancer.

Authors:  Reza Bayat Mokhtari; Tina S Homayouni; Narges Baluch; Evgeniya Morgatskaya; Sushil Kumar; Bikul Das; Herman Yeger
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

8.  A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of lycopene and curcumin in oral submucous fibrosis patients: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gargi Saran; Deepak Umapathy; Neeta Misra; Shivakumar Ganiga Channaiah; Priya Singh; Saurabh Srivastava; Sahana Shivakumar
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2018 May-Jun

Review 9.  Role of Lycopene in Preventing Oral Diseases as a Nonsurgical Aid of Treatment.

Authors:  Sonia Gupta; Manveen Kaur Jawanda; Vikram Arora; Nishant Mehta; Vipul Yadav
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08-05

10.  Efficacy of oral colchicine with intralesional hyaluronidase or triamcinolone acetonide in the Grade II oral submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  Dipti Daga; R K Singh; U S Pal; Tikaram Gurung; Shilpi Gangwar
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  From Simple Mouth Cavities to Complex Oral Mucosal Disorders-Curcuminoids as a Promising Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Sosmitha Girisa; Aviral Kumar; Varsha Rana; Dey Parama; Uzini Devi Daimary; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Alan Prem Kumar; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-03-17

2.  Correlation of Clinical Features in Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A 9-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sneha R Sharma; Samiksha Chavan; Freny R Karjodkar; Kaustubh Sansare; S Bharathi; Shivani Singh
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2022-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.