Tara Kirk Sell1, Matthew P Shearer1, Diane Meyer1, Mary Leinhos2, Erin Thomas3, Eric G Carbone2. 1. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security; Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. 2. Office of Applied Research, Center for Preparedness and Response, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 3. Public Health Preparedness Oak Ridge Institute for Science Fellowship, Office of Applied Research, Center for Preparedness and Response, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article describes implementation considerations for Ebola-related monitoring and movement restriction policies in the United States during the 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola epidemic. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and May 2017 with 30 individuals with direct knowledge of state-level Ebola policy development and implementation processes. Individuals represented 17 jurisdictions with variation in adherence to US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, census region, predominant state political affiliation, and public health governance structures, as well as the CDC. RESULTS: Interviewees reported substantial resource commitments required to implement Ebola monitoring and movement restriction policies. Movement restriction policies, including for quarantine, varied from voluntary to mandatory programs, and, occasionally, quarantine enforcement procedures lacked clarity. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve future monitoring and movement restriction policies may include addressing surge capacity to implement these programs, protocols for providing support to affected individuals, coordination with law enforcement, and guidance on varying approaches to movement restrictions.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes implementation considerations for Ebola-related monitoring and movement restriction policies in the United States during the 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola epidemic. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and May 2017 with 30 individuals with direct knowledge of state-level Ebola policy development and implementation processes. Individuals represented 17 jurisdictions with variation in adherence to US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, census region, predominant state political affiliation, and public health governance structures, as well as the CDC. RESULTS: Interviewees reported substantial resource commitments required to implement Ebola monitoring and movement restriction policies. Movement restriction policies, including for quarantine, varied from voluntary to mandatory programs, and, occasionally, quarantine enforcement procedures lacked clarity. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve future monitoring and movement restriction policies may include addressing surge capacity to implement these programs, protocols for providing support to affected individuals, coordination with law enforcement, and guidance on varying approaches to movement restrictions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ebola; epidemiological monitoring; infectious disease; public health practice; quarantine
Authors: Tara Kirk Sell; Emma E McGinty; Keshia Pollack; Katherine Clegg Smith; Thomas A Burke; Lainie Rutkow Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2017 Jan/Feb
Authors: Carolyn L McCarty; Colin Basler; Mateusz Karwowski; Marguerite Erme; Gene Nixon; Chris Kippes; Terry Allan; Toinette Parrilla; Mary DiOrio; Sietske de Fijter; Nimalie D Stone; David A Yost; Susan A Lippold; Joanna J Regan; Margaret A Honein; Barbara Knust; Christopher Braden Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 17.586