Qiao Yi1, Xiaoyu Feng1, Chunmei Zhang1, Xiumei Wang2, Xiaoshan Wu1,3, Jingsong Wang1,4, Fuzhai Cui2, Songlin Wang1,4. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Tooth Regeneration and Function Reconstruction, Capital Medical University School of Stomatology, Beijing, P. R. China. 2. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Shangsha, China. 4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Abstract
Purpose: Even though differences between deciduous and permanent dentin have been widely studied, their dynamic mechanical behavior has never been compared. The objective of the present study was to quantify the differences between deciduous and permanent dentin under cyclic mechanical loading, which is similar to masticatory stress.Materials and Methods: Deciduous and permanent teeth, respectively from children (9 ~ 12 years old) and young people (18 ~ 25 years old), were wet-sectioned perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and the central specimens of coronal dentin were evaluated by nanoscopic dynamic mechanical analysis (nanoDMA). Results: The average storage, loss, and complex moduli, as well as the hardness of deciduous dentin were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than those of permanent dentin. Moreover, the tan δ value of permanent dentin was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of deciduous dentin across the loading frequency range, indicating that viscoelastic behavior and loss of elastic energy were significantly reduced in the stiffer permanent dentin. All the nanoDMA responses showed a significant influence of the dynamic loading frequency (p < 0.05): Both deciduous and permanent dentin showed reduced viscoelasticty with increased loading frequencies.Conclusions: Compared with deciduous dentin, permanent dentin exhibits higher stiffness with reduced energy loss during deformation, and therefore superior mechanical characteristics for the mastication process.
Purpose: Even though differences between deciduous and permanent dentin have been widely studied, their dynamic mechanical behavior has never been compared. The objective of the present study was to quantify the differences between deciduous and permanent dentin under cyclic mechanical loading, which is similar to masticatory stress.Materials and Methods: Deciduous and permanent teeth, respectively from children (9 ~ 12 years old) and young people (18 ~ 25 years old), were wet-sectioned perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and the central specimens of coronal dentin were evaluated by nanoscopic dynamic mechanical analysis (nanoDMA). Results: The average storage, loss, and complex moduli, as well as the hardness of deciduous dentin were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than those of permanent dentin. Moreover, the tan δ value of permanent dentin was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of deciduous dentin across the loading frequency range, indicating that viscoelastic behavior and loss of elastic energy were significantly reduced in the stiffer permanent dentin. All the nanoDMA responses showed a significant influence of the dynamic loading frequency (p < 0.05): Both deciduous and permanent dentin showed reduced viscoelasticty with increased loading frequencies.Conclusions: Compared with deciduous dentin, permanent dentin exhibits higher stiffness with reduced energy loss during deformation, and therefore superior mechanical characteristics for the mastication process.