| Literature DB >> 32308051 |
Xueyan Liu1,2, Liangke Zhang1,2, Wengao Jiang1, Zhangyou Yang1, Zongjie Gan1,2,3, Chao Yu1, Ran Tao1,2, Huali Chen1,2,3.
Abstract
Ischemic cardiac disease (ICD) is a cardiovascular disease with high morbidity and mortality. In this study, a novel myocardial targeted drug delivery system was developed represented by co-modified liposomes consisting of red cell membrane (RCM), and the peptides TAT and PCM. Liposomes were prepared using a membrane dispersion-ultrasonic method; the prepared 1% TAT and 3% PCM micelles were mixed with liposomes and under overnight stirring to form polypeptid-modified liposomes. RCM was isolated from mice blood, and the mechanical force facilitated RCM adhesion to the lipid bilayer. The characteristics of liposomes such as the morphology, particle size, zeta-potential, and RCM-conjugation to lipsomes were evaluated. Uptake efficiency and cellular toxicity of liposomes were evaluated in vitro on myocardial cells (MCs). As regard the experiments in vivo, liposomes were intravenously injected into mice, and the blood and organs were collectedat different times to analyze the pharmacokinetics profile of liposomes. The cellular uptake and intracellular distribution of liposomes of different composition into MCs demonstrated that RCM-modified liposomes had the best delivery capability. The pharmacokinetics study further demonstrated that RCM-modified liposomes had prolonged mean residence time (MRT) and more accumulation in the heart. This study indicated that RCM can be used to modify liposomes in combination with polypeptides, because such modification increases the myocardial targeting of liposomes. Therefore, this system constructed in this study might be a potentially effective myocardial drug delivery system.Entities:
Keywords: Myocardium delivery; PCM; TAT; liposomes; red cell membrane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32308051 PMCID: PMC7191910 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1754525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Particle size, PDI, zeta-potentialand encapsu-lation efficiency of various liposomes.
| Samples | Size(nm) | PDI | Zeta(mV) | EE/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | 108.7 ± 0.56 | 0.141 ± 0.024 | −15.0 ± 0.3 | 90.23 ± 2.03 |
| L-RCM | 260 ± 0.60 | 0.254 ± 0.027 | −16.1 ± 0.3 | 89.67 ± 1.98 |
| L-TAT | 109 ± 0.47 | 0.174 ± 0.020 | −15.3 ± 0.4 | 90.32 ± 2.54 |
| L-TAT-RCM | 278 ± 0.65 | 0.247 ± 0.013 | −16.5 ± 0.3 | 90.53 ± 3.02 |
| L-PCM | 117 ± 0.50 | 0.168 ± 0.031 | −15.1 ± 0.1 | 89.83 ± 2.56 |
| L-PCM-RCM | 282 ± 0.34 | 0.316 ± 0.015 | −16.3 ± 0.3 | 88.45 ± 3.04 |
| L-TAT-PCM | 120 ± 0.68 | 0.198 ± 0.025 | −15.2 ± 0.2 | 87.57 ± 2.39 |
| L-TAT-PCM-RCM | 290 ± 0.73 | 0.294 ± 0.035 | −16.6 ± 0.3 | 87.57 ± 2.78 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). L: coumarin-6 loaded coventional liposomes; L-RCM: RCM-coated liposomes; L-TAT: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-modified liposomes; L-TAT-RCM: RCM-coated TAT-modified liposomes; L-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded PCM-modified liposomes; L-PCM-RCM: RCM-coated PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM-RCM: RCM-TAT-PCM-modified liposomes.
Figure 1.TEM images of coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes (L-TAT-PCM) and RCM-modified TAT-PCM-modified liposomes (L-TAT-PCM-RCM). (A) L-TAT-PCM and (B) L-TAT-PCM-RCM.
Figure 2.SDS-PAGE of liposomes with or without RCM. Line 1: RCM; Line 2: liposomes (L); Line 3: RCM-coated liposomes (L-RCM); Line 4: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes (L-TAT-PCM); Line 5: RCM-coated TAT-PCM-modifiedliposomes (L-TAT-PCM-RCM).
Figure 3.Cellular uptake of different liposomes by MCs. The green fluorescence is referred to the coumarin-6 after entering the cell, and the blue color indicates the nucleus stained by DAPI. L: coumarin-6 loaded conventional liposomes; L-RCM: RCM-coated liposomes; L-TAT: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-modified liposomes; L-TAT-RCM: RCM-coated TAT-modified liposomes; L-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded PCM-modified liposomes; L-PCM-RCM: RCM-coated PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM-RCM: RCM-TAT-PCM-modified liposomes.
Figure 4.Fluorescence intensity of different liposomes by flow cytometry. The results are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). L: coumarin-6 loaded conventional liposomes; L-RCM: RCM-coated liposomes; L-TAT: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-modified liposomes; L-TAT-RCM: RCM-coated TAT-modified liposomes; L-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded PCM-modified liposomes; L-PCM-RCM: RCM-coated PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM-RCM: RCM-TAT-PCM-modified liposomes.
Figure 5.Cell viability in MCs after the treatment with different modified liposome. The results are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). L: coumarin-6 loaded coventional liposomes; L-RCM: RCM-coated liposomes; L-TAT: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-modified liposomes; L-TAT-RCM: RCM-coated TAT-modified liposomes; L-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded PCM-modified liposomes; L-PCM-RCM: RCM-coated PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes; L-TAT-PCM-RCM: RCM-TAT-PCM-modified liposomes.
Figure 6.Plasma concentration of coumarin-6 after intravenous administration of different liposomes. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). (A) Plasma concentration of coumarin-6 loaded L, RCM-L (1:10) and RCM-L (1:20). L: conventional liposomes; RCM-L (1:10): RCM modified conventional liposomes with a RCM/liposome ratio of 1:10 (v:v); RCM-L (1:20): RCM modified conventional liposomes with a RCM/liposome ratio of 1:20 (v:v). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with L. (B) Plasma concentration of coumarin-6 loaded L-TAT-PCM and RCM-L-TAT-PCM. L-TAT-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes; RCM-L-TAT-PCM (1:10): coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes with a RCM/liposome ratio of 1:10 (v:v); *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with L-TAT-PCM.
MRT and AUC of coumarin-6 after intravenous administration of coumarin-6 loaded L, RCM-L (1:10) and RCM-L (1:20).
| L | RCM: L = 1:20 | RCM: L = 1:10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRT (h) | 10.811 ± 1.466 | 13.761 ± 1.201* | 19.378 ± 2.103*** |
| AUC (mg/L*h) | 33.377 ± 7.587 | 59.289 ± 9.678** | 79.197 ± 9.623*** |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). L: conventional lipsomes; RCM-L (1:10): RCM modified conventional liposomes with a RCM/liposome ratio of 1:10 (v:v); RCM-L (1:20): RCM modified conventional liposomes with a RCM/liposome ratio of 1:20 (v:v). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with L.
MRT and AUC of coumarin-6 loaded L-TAT-PCM and RCM-L-TAT-PCM.
| L-TAT-PCM | RCM: TAT-PCM-L = 1:10 | |
|---|---|---|
| MRT (h) | 12.067 ± 1.391 | 22.846 ± 2.462*** |
| B-AUC (mg/L*h) | 107.142 ± 11.121 | 158.071 ± 14.251* |
| H-AUC (mg/L*h) | 192.749 ± 16.755 | 402.001 ± 21.631*** |
L-TAT-PCM: coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes; RCM-L-TAT-PCM (1:10): coumarin-6 loaded TAT-PCM-modified liposomes with a RCM/liposome ratio of 1:10 (v:v); *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001 compared with L-TAT-PCM.
Figure 7.Concentration of coumarin-6 in the heart after administration of L-TAT-PCM and L-TAT-PCM-RCM at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. The results were expressed as the weight ratio of coumarin-6 and heart (ng/g) and presented as mean ± SD (n = 6).**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with L-TAT-PCM.