Literature DB >> 32307625

The User-Program Interaction: How Teacher Experience Shapes the Relationship Between Intervention Packaging and Fidelity to a State-Adopted Health Curriculum.

Andria B Eisman1, Amy M Kilbourne2,3, Dana Greene4, Maureen Walton2,5, Rebecca Cunningham5,6.   

Abstract

Intervention effects observed in efficacy trials are rarely seen when programs are broadly disseminated, underscoring the need to better understand factors influencing fidelity. The Michigan Model for Health™ (MMH) is an evidence-based health curriculum disseminated in schools throughout Michigan that is widely adopted but delivered with limited fidelity. Understanding implementation determinants and how they influence fidelity is essential to achieving desired implementation and behavioral outcomes. The study surveyed health teachers throughout Michigan (n = 171) on MMH implementation, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We investigated relationships between context, intervention and provider factors and dose delivered (i.e., the proportion of curriculum delivered by teachers), a fidelity dimension. We also examined whether intervention factors were moderated by provider factors to influence fidelity. Our results indicated that program packaging ratings were associated with dose delivered (fidelity). We also found that this relationship was moderated by teacher experience. The strength of this relationship diminished with increasing levels of experience, with no relationship among the most experienced teachers. Intervention adaptability was also associated with dose delivered. We found no association between health education policies (context), provider beliefs, and dose delivered. Intervention factors are important determinants of fidelity. Our results suggest that providers with more experience may need materials tailored to their knowledge and skill level to support materials' continued usefulness and fidelity long-term. Our results also suggest that promoting adaptability may help enhance fidelity. Implementation strategies that focus on systematically adapting evidence-based health programs may be well suited to enhancing the fidelity of the MMH curriculum across levels of teacher experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based practice; Health, school; Implementation science; Prevention; Program evaluation; Youth

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32307625      PMCID: PMC7368812          DOI: 10.1007/s11121-020-01120-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  21 in total

1.  Promoting mental health and preventing substance abuse and violence in elementary students: a randomized control study of the Michigan Model for Health.

Authors:  James M O'neill; Jeffrey K Clark; James A Jones
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.118

2.  User-Centered Redesign of Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions to Enhance Implementation-Hospitable Soil or Better Seeds?

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Eric J Bruns
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Advances in EBI Development for Diverse Populations: Towards a Science of Intervention Adaptation.

Authors:  Felipe Gonzalez Castro; Miwa Yasui
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2017-08

4.  One-year follow-up evaluation of the Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND) dissemination trial.

Authors:  Louise A Rohrbach; Ping Sun; Steve Sussman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Searching for elements of evidence-based practices in children's usual care and examining their impact.

Authors:  Ann F Garland; Erin C Accurso; Rachel Haine-Schlagel; Lauren Brookman-Frazee; Scott Roesch; Jin Jin Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2014-02-20

6.  Three-year trajectory of teachers' fidelity to a drug prevention curriculum.

Authors:  Christopher L Ringwalt; Melinda M Pankratz; Julia Jackson-Newsom; Nisha C Gottfredson; William B Hansen; Steven M Giles; Linda Dusenbury
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2010-03

7.  Assessing organizational implementation context in the education sector: confirmatory factor analysis of measures of implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Clayton R Cook; Eric C Brown; Jill Locke; Chayna Davis; Mark Ehrhart; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions.

Authors:  Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Christopher J Miller; Katherine Toder; Amber Calloway
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Lessons learned from the whole child and coordinated school health approaches.

Authors:  Catherine N Rasberry; Sean Slade; David K Lohrmann; Robert F Valois
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.118

10.  The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change.

Authors:  David A Chambers; Russell E Glasgow; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  5 in total

1.  Understanding key implementation determinants for a school-based universal prevention intervention: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Andria B Eisman; Sarah Kiperman; Laney A Rupp; Amy M Kilbourne; Lawrence A Palinkas
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Usability Issues in Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions and Implementation Strategies: Cross-project Analysis.

Authors:  Sean A Munson; Emily C Friedman; Katie Osterhage; Ryan Allred; Michael D Pullmann; Patricia A Areán; Aaron R Lyon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.076

3.  Three-dimensional psychological guidance combined with evidence-based health intervention in patients with liver abscess treated with ultrasound.

Authors:  Ya-Nan Shan; Ying Yu; Yi-Han Zhao; Lian-Lian Tang; Xiao-Min Chen
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.534

4.  Michigan Model for HealthTM Learning to Enhance and Adapt for Prevention (Mi-LEAP): protocol of a pilot randomized trial comparing Enhanced Replicating Effective Programs versus standard implementation to deliver an evidence-based drug use prevention curriculum.

Authors:  Andria B Eisman; Lawrence A Palinkas; Christine Koffkey; Todd I Herrenkohl; Umaima Abbasi; Judy Fridline; Leslie Lundahl; Amy M Kilbourne
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-09-10

5.  The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Jessica Coifman; Heather Cook; Erin McRee; Freda F Liu; Kristy Ludwig; Shannon Dorsey; Kelly Koerner; Sean A Munson; Elizabeth McCauley
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-07-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.