| Literature DB >> 32307341 |
Nobuhide Kido1, Sohei Tanaka1, Tomoko Omiya1, Yuko Kamite1, Kohei Sawada1, Yoko Komatsu2, Yasuyuki Shoji1, Masaru Senzaki1, Sayuri Hanzawa1, Masato Ando1, Ikko Suto1.
Abstract
Fatal accidents in captive elephants occasionally occur because humans are unable to gauge elephants' emotions solely by their behavior. The intellectual capacity of elephants makes them capable of understanding circumstantial changes and associated emotions, allowing them to react accordingly. Physiological markers, such as heart rate variability, may be effective in determining an elephant's emotional state. In this study, a wearable heart rate monitor was used to determine the emotional state of a female Indian captive elephant (Elephas maximus indicus). The average heart rate was higher when the elephant underwent painful treatment than when it underwent non-painful treatment. In addition, the heart rate increased both before and after the treatment, which included radiography and blood collection.Entities:
Keywords: Elephas maximus; blood collection; radiography; stress; training
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32307341 PMCID: PMC7324812 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.19-0637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Fig. 1.The wearable heart rate monitoring device and position on which it was secured. (a) The stretchable conductive film (COCOMITM; arrow) and wearable heart rate sensor (myBeat; arrow head). The wearable heart rate monitoring device was placed on a cut bicycle rubber tube. Scale bar: 40 cm. (b) The rubber tube with the wearable device was secured on the elephant’s chest with an elastic band. The square part is Fig. 1 (c). (c) The enlarged figure of the square part is Fig. 1 (b). The arrow indicates the part of the wearable device that was placed on the elephant’s chest.
The average heart rate and standard deviation and the heart rate measurement ratios in each examination
| Heart rate (bpm) | Heart rate measurement ratio (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average S.D. | Average S.D. | Average | Average | ||
| C-1 | 36.0 ± 2.7 | 37.5 ± 3.5 | 67.2 | 58.5 | |
| C-2 | 39.7 ± 3.5 | 49.8 | |||
| E-1 | Radiography | 36.8 ± 2.9 | 36.6 ± 2.8a) | 23.1 | 17.9 |
| E-2 | 37.9 ± 3.8 | 7.4 | |||
| E-3 | 37.0 ± 2.6 | 18.0 | |||
| E-4 | 35.8 ± 2.7 | 24.3 | |||
| E-5 | 35.2 ± 1.9 | 11.5 | |||
| E-6 | 37.2 ± 2.7 | 23.2 | |||
| E-7 | Blood Collection | 35.6 ± 2.2 | 34.6 ± 2.5a) | 37.2 | 22.7 |
| E-8 | Blood Collection | 33.5 ± 2.3 | 18.4 | ||
| E-9 | 33.7 ± 2.7 | 12.5 | |||
S.D.: Standard deviation. a) P<0.01 (the average heart rate between E-1 and 6 and E-7 and 9).
Fig. 2.The average heart rate from pre-initiation to post-treatment of the elephant’s hoof in E-1 to 6, when the elephant received the aggressive treatment and E-7 to 9, when the elephant received no or minor treatment. The values in parentheses are for the average time required to conduct each procedure.
Fig. 3.The change in the heart rate and heart rate measurement ratio during radiography (a) and blood collection (b). The heart rate and heart rate measurement ratio are a line and bar graph, respectively. The values in parentheses are for the average time required to conduct each procedure.