Literature DB >> 3230723

A pulsatile pump for cardiopulmonary bypass and its clinical use.

Y Sasaki1, T Kawai, K Nishiyama, Y Murayama, S Toda, T Wada, K Kitaura, S Sato, M Kadowaki, Y Kanki.   

Abstract

A pulsatile pump driven by a coil spring, which was designed and constructed by us, is described in this report. It consists of two main parts, a disposable blood chamber and a driving section. The blood chamber has two leaflet valves and a piston, which is covered with two bellofram rolling diaphragms and moves into the housing to draw in and eject the blood. The driving section consists of three cams, an electric motor and a coil spring. The ejection force is wholly produced by the compressed coil spring and is transmitted to the piston in the blood chamber by a rod. This pump allows the ejection pressure, the beat rates, and the stroke volume all to be changed independently. The performance of the pump was tested by using a circulation model where the beat rate was adjusted from 30 to 250 bpm. The output subsequently increased from 0.8 l/min to 5.7 l/min and the stroke volume, from 20.4 ml to 36.7 ml. This new pump has been used for clinical cardiopulmonary bypasses in 24 patients of open heart surgery and the pressure traces during perfusion resembled those of the patients' own hearts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3230723     DOI: 10.1007/bf02471480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Surg        ISSN: 0047-1909


  15 in total

1.  A small pulsatile pump for extracorporeal circulation.

Authors:  Y Sasaki; H Sakabe; T Hara; I Hashimoto
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1977-06

2.  The effects of low flow, low pressure pulsatile bypass.

Authors:  P Belcher; S C Lennox
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.888

3.  Pulsatile flow during routine cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  I S Chiu; S H Chu; C R Hung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.888

4.  Pulsatile vs. non-pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass. A comparison of early postoperative changes.

Authors:  H Lindberg; J L Svennevig; P Lilleaasen; K Vatne
Journal:  Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1984

5.  Pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass. Evaluation of a new pulsatile pump.

Authors:  J Waaben; K Andersen; B Husum
Journal:  Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985

6.  Attenuation of the stress response to cardiopulmonary bypass by the addition of pulsatile flow.

Authors:  D M Philbin; F H Levine; K Kono; C H Coggins; J Moss; E E Slater; M J Buckley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Quantification of pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass to permit direct comparison of the effectiveness of various types of "pulsatile" and "nonpulsatile" flow.

Authors:  E A Grossi; M W Connolly; K H Krieger; I M Nathan; C E Hunter; S B Colvin; F G Baumann; F C Spencer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Plasma vasopressin levels and urinary sodium excretion during cardiopulmonary bypass with and without pulsatile flow.

Authors:  F H Levine; D M Philbin; K Kono; C H Coggins; C W Emerson; W G Austen; M J Buckley
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Thromboxane and prostacyclin changes during cardiopulmonary bypass with and without pulsatile flow.

Authors:  W D Watkins; M B Peterson; D L Kong; K Kono; M J Buckley; F H Levine; D M Philbin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Comparative clinical study of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion in 350 consecutive patients.

Authors:  K M Taylor; W H Bain; K G Davidson; M A Turner
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.