Literature DB >> 32306865

Evaluation of a competitive inhibition ELISA based on the recombinant protein tSAG1 to detect anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle.

María B Novoa1,2, Beatriz S Valentini1,2, Macarena Sarli1,2, Susana M Torioni-de-Echaide1,2, María E Primo1,2, Ignacio E Echaide1,2.   

Abstract

Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite that causes abortion and important economic losses in cattle worldwide. There are no treatments or vaccines available; disease control is based on diagnosis and herd management strategies. We developed, validated, and evaluated under field conditions a competitive inhibition ELISA based on the truncated SAG1 protein (tSAG1), expressed in Escherichia coli, and the RafNeo5 monoclonal antibody (ciELISAtSAG1). A criterion based on the 3-y sequential serologic analysis of 230 dairy cows by IFAT was used as the gold standard. The assay was validated using 860 serum samples from cows that were consistently positive or negative by IFAT throughout the study period. ciELISAtSAG1 was then used to evaluate the prevalence of neosporosis in 16 beef cow herds (22 samples per herd, 352 total samples). The results were compared with those from IFAT and a commercial cELISA (cELISAVMRD). The ciELISAtSAG1 cutoff was ≥ 29%I, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 98.7% (95% CI = 96.8-99.7%) and a diagnostic specificity of 97.9% (95% CI = 96.4-99.0%). Concordance among IFAT, cELISAVMRD, and ciELISAtSAG1 was 90.3%. The agreement (κ) between ciELISAtSAG1 and the other 2 tests was ≥ 0.81. The overall prevalence of neosporosis in the 16 beef herds was 30% (range: 5-60%). The ciELISAtSAG1 could be useful for large-scale detection of anti-N. caninum antibodies in cattle and seroepidemiologic investigations, given its appropriate sensitivity and specificity, and the simplicity of production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SAG1; cattle; competitive inhibition ELISA; diagnosis; neosporosis; prevalence; serology; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32306865      PMCID: PMC7377610          DOI: 10.1177/1040638720916711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  32 in total

1.  Use of purified tachyzoite surface antigen p38 in an ELISA to diagnose bovine neosporosis.

Authors:  G Schares; M Rauser; P Söndgen; P Rehberg; A Bärwald; J P Dubey; R Edelhofer; F J Conraths
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 2.  Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  F Baneyx
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.740

3.  Validation of a commercially available monoclonal antibody-based competitive-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of serum antibodies to Neospora caninum in cattle.

Authors:  T V Baszler; S Adams; J Vander-Schalie; B A Mathison; M Kostovic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Serological diagnosis of bovine neosporosis: a comparative study of commercially available ELISA tests.

Authors:  Gema Alvarez-García; Alicia García-Culebras; Daniel Gutiérrez-Expósito; Vanesa Navarro-Lozano; Iván Pastor-Fernández; Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  Seroepidemiological study of Neospora caninum in beef and dairy cattle in La Pampa, Argentina.

Authors:  Marcelo Fort; Martyn Edelsten; Stephen Maley; Elisabeth Innes
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.440

Review 6.  Standardisation and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques for the detection of antibody in infectious disease diagnosis.

Authors:  P F Wright; E Nilsson; E M Van Rooij; M Lelenta; M H Jeggo
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.181

7.  Clinical neosporosis in a 4-week-old Hereford calf.

Authors:  J P Dubey; E B Janovitz; A J Skowronek
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.738

8.  Newly recognized fatal protozoan disease of dogs.

Authors:  J P Dubey; J L Carpenter; C A Speer; M J Topper; A Uggla
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 9.  Control options for Neospora caninum--is there anything new or are we going backwards?

Authors:  Michael P Reichel; Milton M McAllister; William E Pomroy; Carlos Campero; Luis M Ortega-Mora; John T Ellis
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 10.  Importance of serological cross-reactivity among Toxoplasma gondii, Hammondia spp., Neospora spp., Sarcocystis spp. and Besnoitia besnoiti.

Authors:  Luís F P Gondim; José R Mineo; Gereon Schares
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.