| Literature DB >> 32306860 |
I Aanouz1, A Belhassan1, K El-Khatabi1, T Lakhlifi1, M El-Ldrissi1, M Bouachrine1,2.
Abstract
The new Corona-virus, recently called the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) appears for the first time in China and more precisely in Wuhan (December 2019). This disease can be fatal. Seniors, and people with other medical conditions (diabetes, heart disease…), may be more vulnerable and become seriously ill. This is why research into drugs to treat this infection remains essential in several research laboratories. Natural herbal remedies have long been the main, if not the only, remedy in the oral tradition for treating illnesses. Modern medicine has known its success thanks to traditional medicine, the effectiveness of which derives from medicinal plants. The objective of this study is to determine if the components of natural origin have an anti-viral effect and which can prevent humans from infection by this coronavirus using the most reliable method is molecular docking, which used to find the interaction between studied molecules and the protein, in our case we based on the inhibitor of Coronavirus (nCoV-2019) main protease. The results of molecular docking showed that among 67 molecules of natural origin, three molecules (Crocin, Digitoxigenin, and β-Eudesmol) are proposed as inhibitors against the coronavirus based on the energy types of interaction between these molecules and studied protein. [Formula: see text] Communicated by Ramaswamy H. SarmaHighlightsDetermine natural compounds that can have an anti-viral effect and which can prevent humans from infection by this coronavirus;Molecular docking to find interaction between the molecules studied and the receptor of COVID-19;The synthesis of these molecules and the evaluation of their in vitro activity against SARS-Cov-2 could be interesting.Entities:
Keywords: CoV-2019; Molecular docking; crocin; digitoxigenin; natural herbal; β-eudesmol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32306860 PMCID: PMC7212546 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1758790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomol Struct Dyn ISSN: 0739-1102
Chemical Composition and Percentages of several plants.
| N° Compound | Name | Plant | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estragol | Foeniculum Vulgare | 5.29 |
| 2 | β-Phellandren | Nerium Oleander | 4.84 |
| 3 | β-Eudesmol | Lauris Nobilis L | 2.39 |
| 4 | Amorphan | Nerium Oleander | 8.11 |
| 5 | α-Terpinyl acetate | Lauris Nobilis L | 10.49 |
| 6 | α-Terpeneol | Myrtus Communis L | 3.84 |
| 7 | Myrtenyl Acetat | Myrtus Communis L | 25.05 |
| 8 | β-Thujone | Sauge Officinal | 3-8.5 |
| 9 | Camphre | Sauge Officinal | 4.5-24.5 |
| 10 | α-Thujone | Sauge Officinal | 18-43 |
| 11 | Isoamyl-2-methyl butyrate | Ammi Visnaga L | 27.68 |
| 12 | Cis- linalool oxide | Ammi Visnaga L | 2.14 |
| 13 | α-Terpinene | Ammi Visnaga L | 3.97 |
| 14 | Amyl valerate | Ammi Visnaga L | 9.98 |
| 15 | Amyl isobutyrate | Ammi Visnaga L | 16.04 |
| 16 | Allyl-methyl disulfide | Allium Sativum | 1.71 |
| Thymelea Tartonraira Artemisia Vulgaris | 2.96 | ||
| 18 | Diallyl sulfide | Allium Sativum | 0.66 |
| 19 | Diallyl disulfide | Allium Sativum | 14.30 |
| 20 | Diallyl trisulfide | Allium Sativum | 46.52 |
| 21 | Tricyclene | Thymelea Tartonraira | 7.11 |
| Thymelea Tartonraira | 3.1 | ||
| 24 | Camphene | Thymelea Tartonraira | 14.66 |
| 25 | Borneol | Thymelea Tartonraira | 2.45 |
| Thymelea Tartonraira | 10.98 | ||
| Thymelea Tartonraira | 8.39 | ||
| Eugenia Caryophyllus | 80 | ||
| 29 | Acetyleugenol | Eugenia Caryophyllus | 6.6 |
| Terpine-4-ol | Nerium Oleander | 3.98 | |
| Sabinene | Nerium Oleander | 3.22 | |
| 32 | Pulegone | Mentha Rotundifolia | 85.47 |
| 33 | Methyl-Eugenol | Lauris Nobilis L | 4.10 |
| 34 | Linalool | Artemisia Vulgaris | 6.77 |
| 35 | Fenchone | Foeniculum Vulgare | 9.55 |
| 36 | Eucalyptol | Lauris Nobilis L | 30.52 |
| 37 | Trans-Cinnamylacetat | Cinnamomum Cassia | 4.69 |
| 38 | Trans-Cinnamaldehyde | Cinnamomum Cassia | 90.08 |
| 39 | Undecan | Allium Cepa L | 8.09 |
| 40 | Undecane-2-6-dimethyl | Allium Cepa L | 6.86 |
| 41 | 2-carboxylic acid,3- methyl thiophene | Allium Cepa L | 8.96 |
| 42 | Safranal | Crocus Sativus L | n.d |
| 43 | pi-Cymene | Thymus Broussoneti | 11 |
| 44 | Picrocrocin | Crocus Sativus L | n.d |
| 45 | Neriine | Nerium Oleander | 22.56 |
| 46 | ɣ -Terpinene | Thymus Broussoneti | 8.99 |
| 47 | Dodecan | Allium Cepa L | 28.69 |
| 48 | Digitoxigenine | Nerium Oleander | 11.25 |
| 49 | Crocin | Crocus Sativus L | N.D |
| 50 | Crocetin | Crocus Sativus L | N.D |
| 51 | Calarene | Nerium Oleander | 5.12 |
| 52 | 1,2,4-Trithiolane,3,5-dimethyl | Allium Cepa L | 5.82 |
| 53 | Trans-Anethole | Foeniculum Vulgare | 53.2 |
| 54 | Undecan,2methyl | Allium Cepa L | 3.59 |
| 55 | 6-Isopropenyl-4,8a-Dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,7,8, 8a-Octahydronaphthalene-2,3-diol | Lavandula Stoechas | 4.56 |
| 56 | α-Terpinene | Myrtus CommunisL | 2.90 |
| 57 | β-Ocimene | Artemisia Vulgaris | 2.21 |
| 58 | Bicyclogermacrene | Artemisia Vulgaris | 3.18 |
| 59 | Acetat Bornyl | Lavandula Stoechas | 8.86 |
| 60 | Cubenol | Lavandula Stoechas | 2.55 |
| 61 | D-Fenchol | Lavandula Stoechas | 6.62 |
| 62 | Geranyl Acetat | Myrtus CommunisL | 2.85 |
| 63 | Germacrene D | Artemisia Vulgaris | 3.82 |
| 64 | 2-Methyl-9-(prop-1-en-3-ol-2-yl)Bicyclo[4.4.0] dec-2-en-4-ol | Lavandula Stoechas | 4.50 |
| 65 | Mycrene | Artemisia Vulgaris | 3.8 |
| 66 | Thymol | Thymus Broussoneti | 63.09 |
| 67 | Viridifloral | Lavandula Stoechas | 6.10 |
Flavor agents docking results.
| N° compound | Binding Energy(Kcal/mol) |
|---|---|
| 1 | −4.7 |
| 2 | −4.7 |
| 3 | −7.1 |
| 4 | −5.8 |
| 5 | −5.7 |
| 6 | −6.1 |
| 7 | −5.9 |
| 8 | −5.6 |
| 9 | −5.8 |
| 10 | −5.6 |
| 11 | −4.8 |
| 12 | −4.4 |
| 13 | −4.9 |
| 14 | −4.3 |
| 15 | −4.3 |
| 16 | −3.2 |
| 17 | −4.6 |
| 18 | −2.9 |
| 19 | −2.9 |
| 20 | −3.3 |
| 21 | −4.6 |
| 22 | −6.1 |
| 23 | −4.7 |
| 24 | −5 |
| 25 | −4.8 |
| 26 | −4.8 |
| 27 | −5.1 |
| 28 | −5.5 |
| 29 | −5.5 |
| 30 | −5 |
| 31 | −5.1 |
| 32 | −5.2 |
| 33 | −5.1 |
| 34 | −4.4 |
| 35 | −5.3 |
| 36 | −5.3 |
| 37 | −5.4 |
| 38 | −5.1 |
| 39 | −3.9 |
| 40 | −4.5 |
| 41 | −4.1 |
| 42 | −5.3 |
| 43 | −5 |
| 44 | −6.8 |
| 45 | −6.9 |
| 46 | −4.9 |
| 47 | −3.9 |
| 48 | −7.2 |
| 49 | −8.2 |
| 50 | −6.2 |
| 51 | −6.1 |
| 52 | −3.1 |
| 53 | −4.5 |
| 54 | −4 |
| 55 | −6.4 |
| 56 | −4.9 |
| 57 | −4.3 |
| 58 | −6.1 |
| 59 | −5.5 |
| 60 | −5.9 |
| 61 | −5 |
| 62 | −5.1 |
| 63 | −5.9 |
| 64 | −6.1 |
| 65 | −4.1 |
| 66 | −4.9 |
| 67 | −5.8 |
11Top compounds docking results.
| N° | Name | Structure | Binding Energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | β-Eudesmol | −7.1 | |
| 6 | α-Terpeneol | −6.1 | |
| 22 | β-Carophyllene | −6.1 | |
| 44 | Picrocrocin | −6.8 | |
| 48 | Digitoxigenine | −7.2 | |
| 49 | Crocin | −8.2 | |
| 50 | Crocetin | −6.2 | |
| 51 | Calarene | −6.1 | |
| 55 | Bicyclogermacrene | −6.1 | |
| 58 | 6-Isopropenyl-4,8a-Dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-Octahydronaphthalene-2,3-diol | −6.4 | |
| 64 | 2-Methyl-9-(prop-1-en-3-ol-2-yl)Bicyclo[4.4.0] dec-2-en-4-ol | −6.1 |
Figure 1.2 D View of the binding conformation of the Crocin inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease.
Figure 2.2 D View of the binding conformation of the Digitoxigenin and β–Eudesmol inhibitors at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease.
Hydrogen bond interaction between the three natural compounds and Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease.
| Molecules | Residue formed Hydrogen bond interaction with studied compounds |
|---|---|
| β–Eudesmol | THR 111 |
| Digitoxigenin | GLN 110, ASP 135 |
| Crocin | THR 135, ASN 133, THR 199, LYS 137, LYS 5, PHE 3, ARG 4, ARG 131 |
Figure 3.3 D View of the binding conformation of the Crocin inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease (Hydrogen Bond interaction).
Figure 4.3 D View of the binding conformation of the Digitoxigenin and β–Eudesmol inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease (Hydrogen Bond interaction).