Literature DB >> 32306860

Moroccan Medicinal plants as inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 main protease: Computational investigations.

I Aanouz1, A Belhassan1, K El-Khatabi1, T Lakhlifi1, M El-Ldrissi1, M Bouachrine1,2.   

Abstract

The new Corona-virus, recently called the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) appears for the first time in China and more precisely in Wuhan (December 2019). This disease can be fatal. Seniors, and people with other medical conditions (diabetes, heart disease…), may be more vulnerable and become seriously ill. This is why research into drugs to treat this infection remains essential in several research laboratories. Natural herbal remedies have long been the main, if not the only, remedy in the oral tradition for treating illnesses. Modern medicine has known its success thanks to traditional medicine, the effectiveness of which derives from medicinal plants. The objective of this study is to determine if the components of natural origin have an anti-viral effect and which can prevent humans from infection by this coronavirus using the most reliable method is molecular docking, which used to find the interaction between studied molecules and the protein, in our case we based on the inhibitor of Coronavirus (nCoV-2019) main protease. The results of molecular docking showed that among 67 molecules of natural origin, three molecules (Crocin, Digitoxigenin, and β-Eudesmol) are proposed as inhibitors against the coronavirus based on the energy types of interaction between these molecules and studied protein. [Formula: see text] Communicated by Ramaswamy H. SarmaHighlightsDetermine natural compounds that can have an anti-viral effect and which can prevent humans from infection by this coronavirus;Molecular docking to find interaction between the molecules studied and the receptor of COVID-19;The synthesis of these molecules and the evaluation of their in vitro activity against SARS-Cov-2 could be interesting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CoV-2019; Molecular docking; crocin; digitoxigenin; natural herbal; β-eudesmol

Year:  2020        PMID: 32306860      PMCID: PMC7212546          DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1758790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn        ISSN: 0739-1102


Introduction

Coronaviruses are non-segmented positive-sense RNA viruses which are part of the family Coronaviridae distributed in humans (Richman et al., 2016), and the subfamily Orthocoronaviridae, there are four genera of coronaviruses; Betacoronavirus, Alpha coronavirus, Gamma coronavirus and Deltacorona virus (Schwartz & Graham, 2020). In humans, especially common colds affecting children and adults, are called mild illnesses. However, there are two zoonotic coronaviruses which are cited: The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) which can especially affect the respiratory system through serious infections. In addition, the latter have the same characteristics: production factors, nosocomial transmission, replication in the lower respiratory tract and viral immunopathology. MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV result from serious public health problems which ultimately lead to epidemics resulting in significant loss of life (Hui, 2017; Perlman, 2020; Hui & Zumla, 2019). When these two zoonotic coronaviruses infect pregnant women, they can lead to poor obstetric outcomes, including maternal morbidity and death. There is currently no specific vaccine or treatment approved for coronavirus infection (Hui & Zumla, 2019; Song et al., 2019). In late December 2019, an outbreak of a new disease, the coronavirus (COVID-19; previously known as 2019-nCoV) (Wu et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020), was reported in Wuhan, the capital from Hubei province and a large city of around 11 million people in the central region of the People’s Republic of China (Zhu, 2020), which subsequently affected 26 countries around the world. China immediately declared the epidemic to the World Health Organization (WHO) and also shared the sequence information with the international community after the discovery of the causative agent. WHO has done its part by coordinating the development of the diagnosis; issue guidelines for patient monitoring, sample collection and treatment; and provide up-to-date information on the epidemic (Munster et al., 2020). To date, the primary source of infection has been pneumonia patients infected with COVID-19. Transmission of respiratory droplets is the main route of transmission, which can also be transmitted by contact (G. O. of N. H. Committee & Office of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020). The source of the virus and its ability to spread between people remains unknown, with an increasing number of cases showing signs of human-to-human transmission (Zhu, 2020; Chan et al., 2020). Currently, there are still no effective treatments that target the coronavirus and the development of these treatments requires months and years, so we must be oriented towards treatments of natural origin based on aromatic and medicinal plants to have the compounds having the ability to inhibit COVID-19 (Chen & Nakamura, 2004). The appearance of SARS, pushes a category of researchers to find anti-coronavirus agents, including certain natural compounds that exist in Morocco herbal medicines. In our study we made a selection of plants based on two principles: the first one is oral efficacy, this means that the majority of Moroccan plants should be absorbable by the oral route, the second one is the compatibility of traditional use, then we have used molecular docking study to selected potential compounds that could have an anti-coronavirus effect by fighting their energy and type of interactions in studied enzyme.

Materials and methods

Data set

For this study we have selected 67 compounds extracted from different aromatic and medicinal plants, Table 1 shows the origin for each studied compound and the percentage present in each plant. These molecules were considered to molecular docking study.
Table 1.

Chemical Composition and Percentages of several plants.

N° CompoundNamePlant%
1EstragolFoeniculum Vulgare5.29
2β-PhellandrenNerium Oleander4.84
3 β-EudesmolLauris Nobilis L2.39
4AmorphanNerium Oleander8.11
5α-Terpinyl acetateLauris Nobilis L10.49
6α-TerpeneolMyrtus Communis LLauris Nobilis L3.849.68
7Myrtenyl AcetatMyrtus Communis LLavandula Stoechas25.0511.54
8β-ThujoneSauge Officinal3-8.5
9CamphreSauge Officinal4.5-24.5
10α-ThujoneSauge Officinal18-43
11Isoamyl-2-methyl butyrateAmmi Visnaga L27.68
12Cis- linalool oxideAmmi Visnaga L2.14
13α-TerpineneAmmi Visnaga L3.97
14Amyl valerateAmmi Visnaga L9.98
15Amyl isobutyrateAmmi Visnaga L16.04
16Allyl-methyl disulfideAllium Sativum1.71
17LimoneneThymelea Tartonraira Artemisia VulgarisFoeniculum VulgareNerium Oleander2.962.588.145.01
18Diallyl sulfideAllium Sativum0.66
19Diallyl disulfideAllium Sativum14.30
20Diallyl trisulfideAllium Sativum46.52
21TricycleneThymelea Tartonraira7.11
22β-CarophylleneThymelea TartonrairaEugenia Caryophyllus3.15-14
23D-CamphorThymelea TartonrairaLavandula StoechasArtemisia Vulgaris37.923.4716.72
24CampheneThymelea TartonrairaArtemisia Vulgaris14.668.35
25BorneolThymelea TartonrairaArtemisia Vulgaris2.4519.65
26α-PineneThymelea TartonrairaMyrtus Communis LNerium Oleander10.98105.54
271-8 CineolThymelea TartonrairaMyrtus Communis LNerium OleanderArtemisia Vulgaris8.3943.036.583.23
28EugenolEugenia CaryophyllusLauris Nobilis L802.15
29AcetyleugenolEugenia Caryophyllus6.6
30Terpine-4-olNerium OleanderLauris Nobilis L3.982.39
31SabineneNerium OleanderLauris Nobilis L3.223.15
32PulegoneMentha Rotundifolia85.47
33Methyl-EugenolLauris Nobilis L4.10
34LinaloolArtemisia VulgarisLauris Nobilis LAmmi Visnaga L6.778.7822.71
35FenchoneFoeniculum VulgareLavandula Stoechas9.556.94
36EucalyptolLauris Nobilis L30.52
37Trans-CinnamylacetatCinnamomum Cassia4.69
38Trans-CinnamaldehydeCinnamomum Cassia90.08
39UndecanAllium Cepa L8.09
40Undecane-2-6-dimethylAllium Cepa L6.86
412-carboxylic acid,3- methyl thiopheneAllium Cepa L8.96
42SafranalCrocus Sativus Ln.d
43pi-CymeneThymus Broussoneti11
44PicrocrocinCrocus Sativus Ln.d
45NeriineNerium Oleander22.56
46ɣ -TerpineneThymus Broussoneti8.99
47DodecanAllium Cepa L28.69
48DigitoxigenineNerium Oleander11.25
49CrocinCrocus Sativus LN.D
50CrocetinCrocus Sativus LN.D
51CalareneNerium Oleander5.12
521,2,4-Trithiolane,3,5-dimethylAllium Cepa L5.82
53Trans-AnetholeFoeniculum Vulgare53.2
54Undecan,2methylAllium Cepa L3.59
556-Isopropenyl-4,8a-Dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,7,8, 8a-Octahydronaphthalene-2,3-diolLavandula Stoechas4.56
56α-TerpineneMyrtus CommunisL2.90
57β-OcimeneArtemisia Vulgaris2.21
58BicyclogermacreneArtemisia Vulgaris3.18
59Acetat BornylLavandula Stoechas8.86
60CubenolLavandula Stoechas2.55
61D-FencholLavandula Stoechas6.62
62Geranyl AcetatMyrtus CommunisL2.85
63Germacrene DArtemisia Vulgaris3.82
642-Methyl-9-(prop-1-en-3-ol-2-yl)Bicyclo[4.4.0] dec-2-en-4-olLavandula Stoechas4.50
65MycreneArtemisia Vulgaris3.8
66ThymolThymus Broussoneti63.09
67ViridifloralLavandula Stoechas6.10

Molecular docking

Molecular docking analysis was used to study the binding affinity and the type of interactions between all compounds (67 molecules) and the target (Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease). The steps for preparing ligands and proteins for docking protocol were done in the Autodock 1.5.4 tools from MGL Tools package employing default settings (Morris et al., 1998), a grid box (x = −26,283, y = 12,599, z = 58,965 at 1 Angstrom spacing), the bioactive conformations were simulated employing Autodock vina (Trott & Olson, 2010). For autodock vina study, an extended PDB format, termed PDBQT, is used for cordonnante files, which includes atomic partial charges and atom types. Torsion angles were calculated to assign the flexible and non-bonded rotation of molecules. The results were subsequently analyzed using Discovery studio 2016 (Pilot, 2016) and PyMol (DeLano, 2002). The crystal structure of Coronavirus(2019-nCoV) main protease (PDB entry code: 6lu7) was downloaded from the protein databank (http://www.rcsb.org), and its original ligand and water were eliminated, then all compounds from our data set were docked in the active site of the studied protein. The preparation of the PDB file was done using Discovery Studio 2016 (Pilot, 2016).

Results and discussion

Totally, we have docked 67 components, Table 2 shows the binding affinity of natural compounds toward main protease, and Table 3 mentioned the 11 top flavor agent docking result based on binding energy.
Table 2.

Flavor agents docking results.

N° compoundBinding Energy(Kcal/mol)
1−4.7
2−4.7
3−7.1
4−5.8
5−5.7
6−6.1
7−5.9
8−5.6
9−5.8
10−5.6
11−4.8
12−4.4
13−4.9
14−4.3
15−4.3
16−3.2
17−4.6
18−2.9
19−2.9
20−3.3
21−4.6
22−6.1
23−4.7
24−5
25−4.8
26−4.8
27−5.1
28−5.5
29−5.5
30−5
31−5.1
32−5.2
33−5.1
34−4.4
35−5.3
36−5.3
37−5.4
38−5.1
39−3.9
40−4.5
41−4.1
42−5.3
43−5
44−6.8
45−6.9
46−4.9
47−3.9
48−7.2
49−8.2
50−6.2
51−6.1
52−3.1
53−4.5
54−4
55−6.4
56−4.9
57−4.3
58−6.1
59−5.5
60−5.9
61−5
62−5.1
63−5.9
64−6.1
65−4.1
66−4.9
67−5.8
Table 3.

11Top compounds docking results.

NameStructureBinding Energy
3β-Eudesmol−7.1
6α-Terpeneol−6.1
22β-Carophyllene−6.1
44Picrocrocin−6.8
48Digitoxigenine−7.2
49Crocin−8.2
50Crocetin−6.2
51Calarene−6.1
55Bicyclogermacrene−6.1
586-Isopropenyl-4,8a-Dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-Octahydronaphthalene-2,3-diol−6.4
642-Methyl-9-(prop-1-en-3-ol-2-yl)Bicyclo[4.4.0] dec-2-en-4-ol−6.1
Flavor agents docking results. 11Top compounds docking results. Hydrogen bond interaction between the three natural compounds and Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease. Table 2 shows the obtained results from the molecular docking study carried out on all the molecules present in different medicinal plants (67 molecules), by giving the interaction energy for each compound, there is a difference in energy between each ligand and nCOV-19 main protease. By comparing all studied molecules with Chloroquine on the basis of the interaction energy criterion. Knowing that the energy value of interaction of the molecule referred (Chloroquine) is (-6 kcal/mol), 11 molecules which have a good interaction with the studied enzyme are mentioned in Table 2. For example, the Crocin at interaction energy equal to (-8.2 kcal/mol), Digitoxigenin at a value of (-7.2 kcal/mol), and β-Eudesmol at a value of (-7.1 kcal/mol). The 3 D binding mode of these compounds is shown in Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 1.

2 D View of the binding conformation of the Crocin inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease.

Figure 2.

2 D View of the binding conformation of the Digitoxigenin and β–Eudesmol inhibitors at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease.

2 D View of the binding conformation of the Crocin inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease. 2 D View of the binding conformation of the Digitoxigenin and β–Eudesmol inhibitors at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease. 3 D View of the binding conformation of the Crocin inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease (Hydrogen Bond interaction). 3 D View of the binding conformation of the Digitoxigenin and β–Eudesmol inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease (Hydrogen Bond interaction). From a biological or pharmacological point of view, these first three molecules which are proposed as inhibitors of Coronavirus main protease are molecules having a significant antiviral power and according to bibliographical research and experiments which have already done, the results found for each molecule of natural origin is as following: Crocin is an important compound in Crocus Sativus L, it has the capacity to inhibit the replication of HSV before and after the entry of virions in Vero cells. Crocin could be a promising anti-HSV and anti-HIV agent for herbal medicine against viral infections (Soleymani et al., 2018). Digitoxigenin: represents 11.25% of the quantity present in Nerium Oleander, the derivatives of these molecules are used as antiviral and anti-cancer inhibitors (Boff et al., 2019). β–Eudesmol despite its low amount of Lauris Nobilis L which contains only 2.39%, but this compound has a good interaction with the target, and it has significant antibacterial and antiviral power (Astani et al., 2011). In our study, we took into account the interaction energies, so the interactions of the 1st level concern the hydrogen bonds, those of the 2nd level concerning the interactions between π systems and cation -π interactions, while the interactions of the 3rd level are hydrophobic contacts and non-specific Van der Waals interactions between aliphatic or aromatic carbon atoms. These interactions are generally spherical with a radius of 4 Å and cover most of the ligand. So, for the displacement of ligand in the binding site of our enzyme, the first level of interactions was considerate as the most important, the presence of Hydrogen bond interaction in selected complex explains that we have a good interaction between the three molecules and the studied protein (Table 4, Figure 3 and 4) (Adnan, 2019).
Table 4.

Hydrogen bond interaction between the three natural compounds and Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease.

MoleculesResidue formed Hydrogen bond interaction with studied compounds
β–EudesmolTHR 111
DigitoxigeninGLN 110, ASP 135
CrocinTHR 135, ASN 133, THR 199, LYS 137, LYS 5, PHE 3, ARG 4, ARG 131
Figure 3.

3 D View of the binding conformation of the Crocin inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease (Hydrogen Bond interaction).

Figure 4.

3 D View of the binding conformation of the Digitoxigenin and β–Eudesmol inhibitor at the active site of Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) main protease (Hydrogen Bond interaction).

Conclusion

Today, the search for new molecules with a preservative power of natural origin is based on ethnobotanical studies which make it possible to carry out inventories of plants in a zone or a country, then on phytochemical and pharmacological studies and well other scientific aspects, so, the importance of the use of these medicinal plants which pushed us to seek and find the molecules which can prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on molecular docking, the results is very satisfactory, we have found three molecules among 67 which are very interesting either on the chemical side or on the biological side and therefore we propose these three molecules as inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. The synthesis of the these molecules and the evaluation of their in vitro and in vivo activity against SARS-Cov-2 main protease could be interesting, before clinical essay.
  46 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition of the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 (Mpro) by repurposing/designing drug-like substances and utilizing nature's toolbox of bioactive compounds.

Authors:  Io Antonopoulou; Eleftheria Sapountzaki; Ulrika Rova; Paul Christakopoulos
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 2.  Methodology-Centered Review of Molecular Modeling, Simulation, and Prediction of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Kaifu Gao; Rui Wang; Jiahui Chen; Limei Cheng; Jaclyn Frishcosy; Yuta Huzumi; Yuchi Qiu; Tom Schluckbier; Xiaoqi Wei; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 72.087

3.  Rational identification of small molecules derived from 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene as potential inhibitors of 3CLpro enzyme for COVID-19 therapy: a computer-aided drug design approach.

Authors:  Ossama Daoui; Souad Elkhattabi; Samir Chtita
Journal:  Struct Chem       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 1.795

4.  Classical Drug Digitoxin Inhibits Influenza Cytokine Storm, With Implications for Covid-19 Therapy.

Authors:  Bette S Pollard; Jorge C BLANCOl; John R Pollard
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  Multi-Omics Approach in the Identification of Potential Therapeutic Biomolecule for COVID-19.

Authors:  Rachana Singh; Pradhyumna Kumar Singh; Rajnish Kumar; Md Tanvir Kabir; Mohammad Amjad Kamal; Abdur Rauf; Ghadeer M Albadrani; Amany A Sayed; Shaker A Mousa; Mohamed M Abdel-Daim; Md Sahab Uddin
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Antiretroviral drug activity and potential for pre-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19 and HIV infection.

Authors:  Dennis C Copertino; Bruno C Casado Lima; Rodrigo R R Duarte; Timothy R Powell; Christopher E Ormsby; Timothy Wilkin; Roy M Gulick; Miguel de Mulder Rougvie; Douglas F Nixon
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.235

7.  Food packaging wastes amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Trends and challenges.

Authors:  Williara Queiroz de Oliveira; Henriette Monteiro Cordeiro de Azeredo; Iramaia Angélica Neri-Numa; Glaucia Maria Pastore
Journal:  Trends Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 12.563

8.  Saffron for "toning down" COVID-19-related cytokine storm: Hype or hope? A mini-review of current evidence.

Authors:  Alexios-Fotios A Mentis; Maria Dalamaga; Cuncun Lu; Moschos G Polissiou
Journal:  Metabol Open       Date:  2021-07-21

9.  Molecular docking, DFT analysis, and dynamics simulation of natural bioactive compounds targeting ACE2 and TMPRSS2 dual binding sites of spike protein of SARS CoV-2.

Authors:  Rohitash Yadav; Shazia Hasan; Sumit Mahato; Ismail Celik; Y S Mary; Ashish Kumar; Puneet Dhamija; Ambika Sharma; Neha Choudhary; Pankaj Kumar Chaudhary; Ankita Singh Kushwah; Jitendra Kumar Chaudhary
Journal:  J Mol Liq       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.165

10.  In silico analysis and identification of antiviral coumarin derivatives against 3-chymotrypsin-like main protease of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Rahman Abdizadeh; Farzin Hadizadeh; Tooba Abdizadeh
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.